A review of upper limb pediatric prostheses and perspectives on future advancements

被引:7
|
作者
Battraw, Marcus A. [1 ]
Fitzgerald, Justin [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Joiner, Wilsaan M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
James, Michelle A. [5 ]
Bagley, Anita M. [5 ]
Schofield, Jonathon S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Neurobiol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Physiol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Behav, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[5] Shriners Hosp Children, Sacramento, CA USA
关键词
pediatric prostheses; quality of life; physical functioning; psychosocial functioning; upper limb; congenital limb deficiency; HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY; BELOW-ELBOW DEFICIENCY; OF-LIFE; YOUNG-ADULTS; CHILDREN; HAND; REHABILITATION; CLASSIFICATION; REINNERVATION; ADOLESCENTS;
D O I
10.1097/PXR.0000000000000094
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Many complex factors affect whether a child with a congenital upper limb deficiency will wear a prosthetic limb. Ultimately, for a child to wear and use their prosthesis, it must facilitate the effective performance of daily tasks and promote healthy social interactions. Although numerous pediatric devices are available, most provide a single open-close grasp (if a grasping function is available at all) and often offer nonanthropomorphic appearances, falling short of meeting these criteria. In this narrative review, we provide a critical assessment of the state of upper limb prostheses for children. We summarize literature using quality of life measures and categorize driving factors affecting prosthesis use into two main groupings: psychosocial and physical functioning. We define psychosocial functioning as factors related to social inclusion/exclusion, emotional function, independence, and school functioning. Physical functioning is defined as factors associated with the physical use of a prosthesis. The reviewed literature suggests that psychosocial domains of quality of life may be influenced by a congenital limb deficiency, and currently available prostheses provide little benefit in the physical functioning domains. Finally, we discuss technological advancements in adult prostheses that have yet to be leveraged for pediatric devices, including describing recently developed adult electric hands that may improve physical functioning through multiple grasping configurations and provide more hand-like cosmesis. We outline actions necessary to translate similar technologies for children and discuss further strategies to begin removing barriers to pediatric device adoption.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 273
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Review of Proprioceptive Feedback Strategies for Upper-Limb Myoelectric Prostheses
    Lecompte, Olivier
    Achiche, Sofiane
    Mohebbi, Abolfazl
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIONICS, 2024, 6 (03): : 930 - 939
  • [22] A Review of Current Upper-Limb Prostheses for Resource Constrained Settings
    Phillips, Brienna
    Zingalis, Gabrielle
    Ritter, Sarah
    Mehta, Khanjan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH IEEE GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE GHTC 2015, 2015, : 52 - 58
  • [23] Myoelectric Control for Upper Limb Prostheses
    Igual, Caries
    Pardo, Luis A., Jr.
    Hahne, Janne M.
    Igual, Jorge
    ELECTRONICS, 2019, 8 (11)
  • [24] TRENDS IN POWERED UPPER LIMB PROSTHESES
    KATO, I
    PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 1978, 2 (02) : 64 - 68
  • [25] Biofeedback for upper limb myoelectric prostheses
    Davalli, A
    Sacchetti, R
    ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY ON THE THRESHOLD OF THE NEW MILLENNIUM, 1999, 6 : 585 - 589
  • [26] Sensory feedback for upper limb prostheses
    Hsiao, Steven S.
    Fettiplace, Michael
    Darbandi, Bejan
    ENHANCING PERFORMANCE FOR ACTION AND PERCEPTION: MULTISENSORY INTEGRATION, NEUROPLASTICITY AND NEUROPROSTHETICS, PT II, 2011, 192 : 69 - 81
  • [27] Externally Powered Upper Limb Prostheses
    Kumar, Deonath
    Patra, Karali
    2015 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURISTIC TRENDS ON COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (ABLAZE), 2015, : 61 - 65
  • [28] POWERED UPPER-LIMB PROSTHESES
    MONTGOMERY, SR
    MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ILLUSTRATION, 1969, 19 (04): : 207 - +
  • [29] Patient perspectives on benefits and risks of implantable interfaces for upper limb prostheses: a national survey
    Resnik, Linda
    Benz, Heather
    Borgia, Matthew
    Clark, Melissa A.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2019, 16 (06) : 515 - 540
  • [30] Perceptions of cosmesis and function in adults with upper limb prostheses: a systematic literature review
    Ritchie, Sophie
    Wiggins, Sally
    Sanford, Alison
    PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 35 (04) : 332 - 341