Impact of Audits and Multifaceted Intervention on Vaginal Birth After Caesarean: Secondary Analysis of the QUARISMA Trial

被引:6
|
作者
Roberge, Stephanie [1 ,2 ]
Boutin, Amelie [1 ]
Bujold, Emmanuel [1 ,3 ]
Dube, Eric [1 ]
Blouin, Simon [1 ]
Chaillet, Nils [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, CHU Quebec, Ctr Rech, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] Kings Coll Hosp London, Harris Birthright Res Ctr Fetal Med, London, England
[3] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
关键词
Caesarean; labour; vaginal birth after Caesarean (VBAC); audits; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CENTERED INTERVENTIONS; UTERINE RUPTURE; DELIVERY RATES; SECTION VBAC; DECISION-AID; WOMEN; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogc.2018.05.044
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study estimated the effect that a multifaceted intervention aiming to improve the quality of obstetrical care and reduce Caesarean section (CS) had on the rate of vaginal birth after Caesarean (VBAC). Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the cluster randomized controlled trial Quality of Care, Obstetrics Risk Management, and Mode of Delivery involving (1) audits regarding the indications for CS, (2) provision of feedback to health professionals, and (3) implementation of best practices to reduce CS rates in Quebec. The impact of intervention on VBAC, trial of labour (TOL), and maternal and neonatal morbidity was reported using adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Out of 105 351 women who delivered during the pre- and postintervention period, 12 493 (11.9%) had a previous CS. We observed no significant impact of the multifaceted intervention on the rates of TOL (adjusted OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.96-1.56, P=0.11) and VBAC (adjusted OR 1.20; 95% CI 0.97-1.48, P=0.10) in women with one previous CS. However, the rate of TOL was reduced (adjusted OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.14-0.99) in women with more than one previous CS. The intervention has no influence on maternal and neonatal morbidity. Conclusions: A multifaceted intervention including audits, feedback to health professionals, and implementation of best practices did not affect VBAC rates or maternal and neonatal morbidity. Our results pointed out the need for decision-making process and risk management tools specific to women with previous CS. (c) 2019 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Societe des obstetriciens et gynecologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:608 / 615
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Internationally agreed strategy is needed on vaginal birth after caesarean
    Varma, R
    Gupta, JK
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7462): : 403 - 403
  • [42] Review of Study of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section (VBAC)
    Taj, G.
    Sohail, N.
    Cheema, S. Z.
    Zahid, N.
    Rizwan, S.
    ANNALS OF KING EDWARD MEDICAL UNIVERSITY LAHORE PAKISTAN, 2008, 14 (01): : 13 - 16
  • [43] Outcomes of vaginal birth after caesarean: experience of a Portuguese hospital
    Ribeiro, Vania Costa
    Martins, Nuno Nogueira
    Martins, Francisco Nogueira
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 207 : 241 - 242
  • [44] Choosing vaginal birth after caesarean section: Motivating factors
    Davis, Deborah
    Homer, Caroline S.
    Clack, Danielle
    Turkmani, Sabera
    Foureur, Maralyn
    MIDWIFERY, 2020, 88
  • [45] The current management of vaginal birth after previous caesarean delivery
    Varma, Rajesh
    OBSTETRICIAN & GYNAECOLOGIST, 2007, 9 (03): : 209 - 210
  • [46] Optimising vaginal birth after caesarean in limited resource settings
    Oyelese, Yinka
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2024, 131 (13) : 1780 - 1781
  • [47] Vaginal birth after Caesarean versus elective repeat Caesarean for women with a single prior Caesarean birth: A systematic review of the literature
    Dodd, J
    Crowther, C
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2004, 44 (05): : 387 - 391
  • [48] Evidence-based vaginal birth after Caesarean section
    Guise, JM
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 19 (01) : 117 - 130
  • [49] Application of predictive model for vaginal birth after caesarean delivery
    Pan, Ruchi
    An, Libin
    Zhang, Wanwan
    Li, Wentao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCES, 2018, 5 (01): : 15 - 17
  • [50] Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: an Australian multicentre study
    Appleton, B
    Targett, C
    Rasmussen, M
    Readman, E
    Sale, F
    Permezel, M
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2000, 40 (01): : 87 - 91