Influence of left ventricular lead position relative to scar location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a model study

被引:37
|
作者
Huntjens, Peter R. [1 ]
Walmsley, John [1 ]
Ploux, Sylvain [2 ]
Bordachar, Pierre [2 ]
Prinzen, Frits W. [3 ]
Delhaas, Tammo [1 ]
Lumens, Joost [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Cardiovasc Res Inst Maastricht, Dept Biomed Engn, Univ Singel 50,POB 616, NL-6229 ER Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Hop Cardiol Haut Leveque, Bordeaux, France
[3] Maastricht Univ, Cardiovasc Res Inst Maastricht, Dept Physiol, Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
EUROPACE | 2014年 / 16卷
关键词
Haemodynamics; Optimization; Heart failure; Biventricular pacing; Computer model;
D O I
10.1093/europace/euu231
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims It is unclear how the position of the left ventricular (LV) lead relative to a scar affects the haemodynamic response in patients with dyssynchronous heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. We investigated this complex interaction using a computational model. Methods and results The CircAdapt computational cardiovascular system model was used to simulate heart failure with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Myocardial scar was induced in four different regions of the LV free wall (LVFW). We then simulated biventricular pacing (BVP) in each heart, in which LV lead position was varied. The LV lead position leading to maximal acute change in LV stroke volume (SV) was defined as optimal lead position. In LBBB without scar, SV increase was maximal when pacing the LVFW region most distant from the septum. With a scar adjacent to the septum, maximal response was achieved when pacing remote from both the septum and the scar. When the scar was located further from the septum, the BVP-induced increase of SV was small. For all hearts, pacing from the optimal LV lead position resulted in the most homogeneous distribution of local ventricular myofibre work and the largest increase in summed left and right ventricular pump work. Conclusions These computer simulations suggest that, in hearts with LBBB and scar, the optimal LV lead position is a compromise between a position distant from the scar and from the septum. In infarcted hearts, the best haemodynamic effect is achieved when electromechanical resynchronization of the remaining viable myocardium is most effective.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 68
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The impact of left ventricular lead position on left ventricular reverse remodelling and improvement in mechanical dyssynchrony in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Kristiansen, H. M.
    Vollan, G.
    Hovstad, T.
    Keilegavlen, H.
    Faerestrand, S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2012, 13 (12) : 991 - 1000
  • [32] Localization of Left Ventricular Lead Electrodes in Relation to Myocardial Scar in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Bisson, Arnaud
    Pucheux, Julien
    Andre, Clementine
    Bernard, Anne
    Pierre, Bertrand
    Babuty, Dominique
    Fauchier, Laurent
    Clementy, Nicolas
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2018, 7 (21):
  • [33] Benefits of a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Underlying Myocardial Scar
    Hussain, Mohsin A.
    Bhamra-Ariza, Paul
    Jacques, Adam
    Wilkinson, Peter
    Odemuyiwa, Olusola
    Fluck, David
    Beeton, Ian
    Kaba, Riyaz A.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 36 (02): : e45 - e47
  • [34] Optimal Left Ventricular Lead Location and the Long-Term Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Dong, Y. X.
    Robert, F. R.
    David, L. H.
    Cha, Y. M.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 117 : 74 - 74
  • [35] Left Ventricular Lead Location and Long-Term Outcomes in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients
    Kutyifa, Valentina
    Kosztin, Annamaria
    Klein, Helmut U.
    Biton, Yitschak
    Nagy, Vivien Klaudia
    Solomon, Scott D.
    McNitt, Scott
    Zareba, Wojciech
    Goldenberg, Ilan
    Roka, Attila
    Moss, Arthur J.
    Merkely, Bela
    Singh, Jagmeet P.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 4 (11) : 1410 - 1420
  • [36] Optimal left ventricular lead location and long-term outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Dong, Y. X.
    Power, B. D.
    Rea, R. F.
    Asirvatham, S. J.
    Webster, T.
    Yang, Y. Z.
    Wiste, H.
    Hayes, D. L.
    Cha, Y. M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 : 610 - 610
  • [37] Effects of left ventricular lead position on cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure of different etiologies
    Sun Jia'an
    Wang Dongmei
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 64 (16) : C156 - C156
  • [38] Long-term clinical outcome and left ventricular lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Kronborg, Mads Brix
    Albertsen, Andi Eie
    Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
    Mortensen, Peter Thomas
    EUROPACE, 2009, 11 (09): : 1177 - 1182
  • [39] Go for the right left ventricular lead position at initial implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy device
    Fyenbo, Daniel Benjamin
    Kronborg, Mads Brix
    Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
    HEART RHYTHM O2, 2022, 3 (05): : 464 - 465
  • [40] Optimal Definition of Left Ventricular Lead Position in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Myocardial Deformation Imaging
    Becker, Michael
    Fraction, Dirk
    Mayer, Christian
    Schauerte, Patrick
    Koch, Karl-Christian
    Kelm, Malts
    Hoffmann, Rainer
    CIRCULATION, 2008, 118 (18) : S619 - S619