Motor Control Exercise for Persistent, Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review

被引:227
|
作者
Macedo, Luciana G. [1 ]
Maher, Christopher G. [2 ]
Latimer, Jane
McAuley, James H.
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, George Inst Int Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Musculoskeletal Div, George Inst Int Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2009年 / 89卷 / 01期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SPINAL STABILIZATION EXERCISES; DIFFERENT TRAINING MODALITIES; LUMBAR MULTIFIDUS MUSCLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA; CLINICAL-TRIAL; PHYSICIAN CONSULTATION; GENERAL EXERCISE; COMBINED MANIPULATION; EUROPEAN GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.2522/ptj.20080103
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Previous systematic reviews have concluded that the effectiveness of motor control exercise for persistent low back pain has not been clearly established. Objective. The objective of this study was to systematically review randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of motor control exercises for persistent low back pain. Methods. Electronic databases were searched to June 2008. Pain, disability, and quality-of-life outcomes were extracted and converted to a common 0 to 100 scale. Where possible, trials were pooled using Revman 4.2. Results. Fourteen trials were included. Seven trials compared motor control exercise with minimal intervention or evaluated it as a Supplement to another treatment. Four trials compared motor control exercise with manual therapy. Five trials compared motor control exercise with another form of exercise. One trial compared motor control exercise with lumbar fusion surgery. The pooling revealed that motor control exercise was better than minimal intervention in reducing pain at short-term follow-up (weighted mean difference=-14.3 points, 95% confidence interval [CI]=-20.4 to -8.1), at intermediate follow-up (weighted mean difference=-13.6 points, 95% CI=-22.4 to -4.1), and at long-term follow-up (weighted mean difference=-14.4 points, 95% CI=-23.1 to -5.7) and in reducing disability at long-term follow-up (weighted mean difference=-10.8 points, 95% CI=-18.7 to -2.8). Motor control exercise was better than manual therapy for pain (weighted mean difference=-5.7 points, 95% CI=-10.7 to -0.8), disability (weighted mean difference=-4.0 points, 95% CI=-7.6 to -0.4), and quality-of-life outcomes (weighted mean difference=-6.0 points, 95% CI=-11.2 to -0.8) at intermediate follow-up and better than other forms of exercise in reducing disability at short-term follow-up (weighted mean difference=-5.1 points, 95% CI=-8.7 to -1.4). Conclusions. Motor control exercise is superior to minimal intervention and confers benefit when added to another therapy for pain at all time points and for disability at long-term follow-up. Motor control exercise is not more effective than manual therapy or other forms of exercise.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 25
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exercise interventions for low back pain are poorly reported: a systematic review
    Davidson, Simon R. E.
    Kamper, Steven J.
    Haskins, Robin
    Robson, Emma
    Gleadhill, Connor
    da Silva, Priscilla Viana
    Williams, Amanda
    Yu, Zhongming
    Williams, Christopher M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 139 : 279 - 286
  • [42] patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Miyamoto, Gisela C.
    Costa, Leonardo O. P.
    Cabral, Cristina M. N.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2013, 17 (06) : 517 - 532
  • [43] Is there an association between hip range of motion and nonspecific low back pain? A systematic review
    Avman, Maya Abady
    Osmotherly, Peter G.
    Snodgrass, Suzanne
    Rivett, Darren A.
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2019, 42 : 38 - 51
  • [44] The predictors for altered central pain modulation in individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain: A systematic review
    Subramanian, Manisha
    Venkatesan, Prem
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2022, 22 (02) : 276 - 284
  • [45] Water-Based Exercise in Patients With Nonspecific Chronic Low-Back Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
    Babiloni-Lopez, Carlos
    Fritz, Nicole
    Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo
    Colado, Juan C.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2024, 38 (01) : 206 - 219
  • [46] Motor control exercise for acute non-specific low back pain
    Macedo, Luciana G.
    Saragiotto, Bruno T.
    Yamato, Tie P.
    Costa, Leonardo O. P.
    Menezes Costa, Luciola C.
    Ostelo, Raymond W. J. G.
    Maher, Christopher G.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (02):
  • [47] Nonspecific Low Back Pain
    Chiarotto, Alessandro
    Koes, Bart W.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 386 (18): : 1732 - 1740
  • [48] Sustainability effects of motor control stabilisation exercises on pain and function in chronic nonspecific low back pain patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression
    Niederer, Daniel
    Mueller, Juliane
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01):
  • [49] Altered Motor Control in Athletes with Low Back Pain: a Literature Review
    Sheikhhoseini, Rahman
    O'Sullivan, Kieran
    Alizadeh, Mohammad Hossein
    Sadeghisani, Meisam
    ANNALS OF APPLIED SPORT SCIENCE, 2016, 4 (04): : 43 - 50
  • [50] Altered Trunk Motor Planning in Patients with Nonspecific Low Back Pain
    Mehta, Rupal
    Cannella, Marco
    Smith, Susan S.
    Silfies, Sheri P.
    JOURNAL OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR, 2010, 42 (02) : 135 - 144