Crucial Evidence: Hobbes on Contractual Obligation

被引:1
|
作者
Venezia, Luciano [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] EHESS, Ctr Etud Sociol & Philosoph Raymond Aron, UMR 8036, Paris, France
[2] Univ Nacl Quilmes, Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
Underdetermination of interpretation; Crucial evidence; Hobbes; Contractual obligation;
D O I
10.1163/18722636-12341246
中图分类号
K [历史、地理];
学科分类号
06 ;
摘要
In this paper, I will introduce the notions of crucial argument and crucial evidence in the philosophy of intellectual history (broadly construed, including the history of political thought). I will use these concepts and take sides in an important controversy in Hobbes studies, namely whether Hobbes holds a prudential or a deontological theory of contractual obligation. Though there is textual evidence for both readings, I will argue that there is especially relevant evidence crucial evidence - for interpreting Hobbes's account in a deontological fashion.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 135
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条