Generalizability of Scaling Gradients on Direct Behavior Ratings

被引:23
|
作者
Chafouleas, Sandra M. [1 ]
Christ, Theodore J. [2 ]
Riley-Tillman, T. Chris [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Educ Psychol, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] E Carolina Univ, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
关键词
Direct Behavior Rating; generalizability; dependability; scale gradients; rating scale; OPTIMAL NUMBER; MONTE-CARLO; RESPONSE CATEGORIES; LIKERT-SCALE; REPORT CARDS; RELIABILITY; DEPENDABILITY; ALTERNATIVES; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1177/0013164408322005
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Generalizability theory is used to examine the impact of scaling gradients on a single-item Direct Behavior Rating (DBR). A DBR refers to a type of rating scale used to efficiently record target behavior(s) following an observation occasion. Variance components associated with scale gradients are estimated using a random effects design for persons (p) by raters (r) by occasions (o). Data from 106 undergraduate student participants are used in the analysis. Each participant viewed and rated video clips of six elementary-aged students who were engaged in a difficult task. Participant ratings are collected three times for each of two behaviors within three scale gradient conditions (6-, 10-, 14- point scale). Scale gradient does not substantially contribute to the magnitude of observed score variances. In contrast, the largest proportions of variance are attributed to rater and error across all scale gradient conditions. Implications, limitations, and future research considerations are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 173
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reliability of Direct Behavior Ratings - Social Competence (DBR-SC) Data: How Many Ratings Are Necessary?
    Kilgus, Stephen P.
    Riley-Tillman, T. Chris
    Stichter, Janine P.
    Schoemann, Alexander M.
    Bellesheim, Katie
    SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2016, 31 (03) : 431 - 442
  • [32] Examining the generalizability of ratings across clerkships using a clinical evaluation form
    Kreiter, CD
    Ferguson, KJ
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2001, 24 (01) : 36 - 46
  • [33] Generalizability of Multidimensional Student Ratings of University Instruction Across Courses and Teachers
    Heiner Rindermann
    Neville Schofield
    Research in Higher Education, 2001, 42 : 377 - 399
  • [34] Consideration of Thurstonian Scaling of Ratings Data
    Warnock, A. R.
    Shumaker, A. N.
    Delwiche, J. F.
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2006, 17 (7-8) : 556 - 561
  • [35] GENERALIZABILITY OF STUDENT-RATINGS OF INSTRUCTION - ESTIMATION OF TEACHER AND COURSE COMPONENTS
    GILLMORE, GM
    KANE, MT
    NACCARATO, RW
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1978, 15 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [36] GENERALIZABILITY AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY OF ANXIETY AND SOCIAL SKILLS RATINGS IN 2 POPULATIONS
    FARRELL, AD
    CURRAN, JP
    ZWICK, WR
    MONTI, PM
    BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 1984, 6 (01): : 1 - 14
  • [37] A generalizability theory analysis of group process ratings in the treatment of cocaine dependence
    Crits-Christoph, Paul
    Johnson, Jennifer
    Gallop, Robert
    Gibbons, Mary Beth Connolly
    Ring-Kurtz, Sarah
    Hamilton, Jessica L.
    Tu, Xin
    PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2011, 21 (03) : 252 - 266
  • [38] A test of the generalizability of a recently suggested conceptual model for assessment center ratings
    Merkulova, Natalia
    Melchers, Klaus G.
    Kleinmann, Martin
    Annen, Hubert
    Tresch, Tibor Szvircsev
    HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2016, 29 (03) : 226 - 250
  • [39] Generalizability of multidimensional student ratings of university instruction across courses and teachers
    Rindermann, H
    Schofield, N
    RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2001, 42 (04) : 377 - 399
  • [40] THE GENERALIZABILITY OF STUDENT-RATINGS OF INSTRUCTORS - ITEM SPECIFICITY AND SECTION EFFECTS
    CROOKS, TJ
    KANE, MT
    RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1981, 15 (04) : 305 - 313