Mammographic screening programmes in Europe: organization, coverage and participation

被引:114
|
作者
Giordano, Livia [1 ]
von Karsa, Lawrence [2 ]
Tomatis, Mariano [1 ]
Majek, Ondrej [3 ]
de Wolf, Chris [4 ,5 ]
Lancucki, Lesz [6 ]
Hofvind, Solveig [7 ]
Nystrom, Lennarth [8 ]
Segnan, Nereo [9 ]
Ponti, Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] AOU S Giovanni Battista, CPO Piemonte, Epidemiol Unit, I-10123 Turin, Italy
[2] Agcy Res Canc, Sect Early Detect & Prevent, Qual Assurance Grp, European Canc Network ECN Screening & Prevent, Lyon, France
[3] Masaryk Univ, Inst Biostat & Anal, Brno, Czech Republic
[4] Breast Canc Screening Program, Fribourg, Switzerland
[5] Swiss Federat Breast Canc Screening, Bern, Switzerland
[6] NHS Canc Screening Programmes, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[7] Canc Registry Norway, Dept Res, Oslo, Norway
[8] Umea Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Med, Umea, Sweden
[9] AOU S Giovanni Battista, CPO Piemonte, Canc Epidemiol Unit, Dept Canc Screening, I-10123 Turin, Italy
关键词
QUALITY-ASSURANCE; PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; BREAST; GUIDELINES; EDITION;
D O I
10.1258/jms.2012.012085
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives To summarize participation and coverage rates in population mammographic screening programmes for breast cancer in Europe. Methods We used the European Network for Information on Cancer (EUNICE), a web-based data warehouse (EUNICE Breast Cancer Screening Monitoring, EBCSM) for breast cancer screening, to obtain information on programme characteristics, coverage and participation from its initial application in 10 national and 16 regional programmes in 18 European countries. Results The total population targeted by the screening programme services covered in the report comprised 26.9 million women predominantly aged 50-69. Most of the collected data relates to 2005, 2006 and/or 2007. The average participation rate across all programmes was 53.4% (range 19.4-88.9% of personally invited); or 66.4% excluding Poland, a large programme that initiated personal invitations in 2007. Thirteen of the 26 programmes achieved the European Union benchmark of acceptable participation (>70%), nine achieved the desirable level (>75%). Despite considerable invitation coverage across all programmes (79.3%, range 50.9-115.2%) only 48.2% (range 28.4-92.1%) of the target population were actually screened. The overall invitation and examination coverage excluding Poland was 70.9% and 50.3%, respectively. Conclusions The results demonstrate the feasibility of European-wide screening monitoring using the EBCSM data warehouse, although further efforts to refine the system and to harmonize standards and data collection practices will be required, to fully integrate all European countries. The more than threefold difference in the examination coverage should be taken into account in the evaluation of service screening programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 82
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Perspectives of Aboriginal women on participation in mammographic screening: a step towards improving services
    Leanne Pilkington
    Margaret M. Haigh
    Angela Durey
    Judith M. Katzenellenbogen
    Sandra C. Thompson
    BMC Public Health, 17
  • [32] Body mass index and participation in organized mammographic screening: a prospective cohort study
    Hellmann, Sophie Sell
    Njor, Sisse Helle
    Lynge, Elsebeth
    von Euler-Chelpin, My
    Olsen, Anja
    Tjonneland, Anne
    Vejborg, Ilse
    Andersen, Zorana Jovanovic
    BMC CANCER, 2015, 15
  • [33] Non-participation in mammographic screening - experiences of women from a region in Sweden
    van Zyl, Maria Norfjord
    Akhavan, Sharareh
    Tillgren, Per
    Asp, Margareta
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [34] Perspectives of Aboriginal women on participation in mammographic screening: a step towards improving services
    Pilkington, Leanne
    Haigh, Margaret M.
    Durey, Angela
    Katzenellenbogen, Judith M.
    Thompson, Sandra C.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 17
  • [35] Participation rates for organized colorectal cancer screening programmes: an international comparison
    Klabunde, Carrie
    Blom, Johannes
    Bulliard, Jean-Luc
    Garcia, Montse
    Hagoel, Lea
    Mai, Verna
    Patnick, Julietta
    Rozjabek, Heather
    Senore, Carlo
    Tornberg, Sven
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2015, 22 (03) : 119 - 126
  • [36] Body mass index and participation in organized mammographic screening: a prospective cohort study
    Sophie Sell Hellmann
    Sisse Helle Njor
    Elsebeth Lynge
    My von Euler-Chelpin
    Anja Olsen
    Anne Tjønneland
    Ilse Vejborg
    Zorana Jovanovic Andersen
    BMC Cancer, 15
  • [37] Non-participation in mammographic screening – experiences of women from a region in Sweden
    Maria Norfjord van Zyl
    Sharareh Akhavan
    Per Tillgren
    Margareta Asp
    BMC Public Health, 20
  • [38] MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING
    DAVIS, DL
    LOVE, SM
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (02): : 152 - 153
  • [39] MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING
    GAMBRELL, RD
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (23): : 1827 - 1827
  • [40] Two sequential randomized trials of community participation to recruit women for mammographic screening
    Clover, K
    Redman, S
    Forbes, J
    SansonFisher, R
    Callaghan, T
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1996, 25 (02) : 126 - 134