Hormone Replacement Therapy and Breast Cancer: Heterogeneous Risks by Race, Weight, and Breast Density

被引:59
|
作者
Hou, Ningqi [1 ]
Hong, Susan [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Wenli [4 ]
Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. [2 ,3 ]
Dignam, James J. [1 ]
Huo, Dezheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Hlth Studies, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Ctr Clin Canc Genet, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Ctr Injury Res & Prevent, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
关键词
ESTROGEN-PLUS-PROGESTIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; HEALTHY POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; INCIDENCE RATES; UNITED-STATES; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; MULTIPLE IMPUTATION; RECENT TRENDS; MENOPAUSE; HYSTERECTOMY;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djt207
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Although studies have demonstrated a positive association between hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and breast cancer risk, this association may vary by patient factors. Methods We analyzed 1 642 824 screening mammograms with 9300 breast cancer cases in postmenopausal women aged 45 years or older derived from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, a longitudinal registry of mammography screening in the United States. Multiple imputation methods were used to accommodate missing data for HRT use (14%) and other covariables. We performed logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for breast cancer associated with HRT use within strata of race/ethnicity, age, body mass index (BMI), and breast density, with two-way interaction terms between HRT use and each key covariable of interest. P values for assessing possible interactions were computed from Wald z statistics. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results HRT use was associated with greater than 20% increased risk in white (OR = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.14 to 1.28), Asian (OR = 1.58; 95% CI = 1.18 to 2.11), and Hispanic women (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.67) but not black women (OR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.72 to 1.14; P-interaction = .04). In women with low/normal BMI and extremely dense breasts, HRT use was associated with the highest breast cancer risk (OR = 1.49; 95% CI = 1.21 to 1.83), compared with nonusers. In overweight/obese women with less-dense breasts, no excess risk was associated with HRT use (adjusted ORs = 0.96 to 1.03). Conclusions The impact of HRT use on breast cancer risk varies according to race/ethnicity, BMI, and breast density. This risk stratification could help in advising HRT use for the relief of menopausal symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:1365 / 1372
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hormone replacement therapy, breast and endometrial cancer
    LaVecchia, C
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 1996, 5 (05) : 414 - 416
  • [22] Hormone replacement therapy and risk of breast cancer
    Ortmann, O
    Schulz, KD
    Diedrich, K
    GYNAKOLOGE, 1998, 31 (10): : 885 - 890
  • [23] Hormone-replacement therapy and breast cancer
    Marsden, J
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2002, 3 (05): : 303 - 311
  • [24] Hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer risk
    Gambrell, RD
    ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 1996, 5 (06) : 341 - 348
  • [25] Hormone Replacement Therapy After Breast Cancer?
    Holzer I.
    Journal für Gynäkologische Endokrinologie/Österreich, 2023, 33 (3): : 126 - 127
  • [26] Hormone replacement therapy after breast cancer
    Kenemans, P
    Scheele, F
    WOMEN'S HEALTH AND MENOPAUSE: RISK REDUCTION STRATEGIES, 1997, 11 : 233 - 240
  • [27] Risk of breast cancer with hormone replacement therapy
    Michels, KB
    MIDLIFE HEALTH - CURRENT CONCEPTS AND CHALLENGES FOR THE FUTURE, 2002, 1229 : 135 - 141
  • [28] Hormone replacement therapy and risk of breast cancer
    Stadel, BV
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (18): : 2360 - 2361
  • [29] Hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer risk
    Koukoulis, GN
    YOUNG WOMAN AT THE RISE OF THE 21ST CENTURY: GYNECOLOGICAL AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES IN HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2000, 900 : 422 - 428
  • [30] Hormone replacement therapy and risk of breast cancer
    Ortmann O.
    Treeck O.
    Inwald E.C.
    Emons G.
    Tempfer C.
    best practice onkologie, 2019, 14 (12) : 570 - 579