Documentation of study medication dispensing in a prospective large randomized clinical trial: Experiences from the ARISTOTLE Trial

被引:6
|
作者
Alexander, John H. [1 ]
Levy, Elliott [2 ]
Lawrence, Jack [2 ]
Hanna, Michael [2 ]
Waclawski, Anthony P. [2 ]
Wang, Junyuan [2 ]
Califf, Robert M. [3 ]
Wallentin, Lars [4 ]
Granger, Christopher B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ Med Ctr, Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[2] Bristol Myers Squibb Co, Princeton, NJ USA
[3] Duke Univ Med Ctr, Duke Translat Med Inst, Durham, NC USA
[4] Uppsala Univ, Uppsala Clin Res Ctr, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; WARFARIN; APIXABAN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2013.05.025
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background In ARISTOTLE, apixaban resulted in a 21% reduction in stroke, a 31% reduction in major bleeding, and an 11% reduction in death. However, approval of apixaban was delayed to investigate a statement in the clinical study report that "7.3% of subjects in the apixaban group and 1.2% of subjects in the warfarin group received, at some point during the study, a container of the wrong type." Methods Rates of study medication dispensing error were characterized through reviews of study medication container tear-off labels in 6,520 participants from randomly selected study sites. The potential effect of dispensing errors on study outcomes was statistically simulated in sensitivity analyses in the overall population. Results The rate of medication dispensing error resulting in treatment error was 0.04%. Rates of participants receiving at least 1 incorrect container were 1.04% (34/3,273) in the apixaban group and 0.77% (25/3,247) in the warfarin group. Most of the originally reported errors were data entry errors in which the correct medication container was dispensed but the wrong container number was entered into the case report form. Sensitivity simulations in the overall trial population showed no meaningful effect of medication dispensing error on the main efficacy and safety outcomes. Conclusions Rates of medication dispensing error were low and balanced between treatment groups. The initially reported dispensing error rate was the result of data recording and data management errors and not true medication dispensing errors. These analyses confirm the previously reported results of ARISTOTLE.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Enhancing cancer clinical trial management: Recommendations from a qualitative study of trial participants' experiences
    Cox, K
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2000, 9 (04) : 314 - 322
  • [32] Association of patient preferences on medication discussion in hypertension: Results from a randomized clinical trial
    Howren, M. Bryant
    Vander Weg, Mark W.
    Christensen, Alan J.
    Kaboli, Peter J.
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2020, 262
  • [33] Challenges in measuring medication adherence: experiences from a controlled trial
    Kay Stewart
    Kevin P. Mc Namara
    Johnson George
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2014, 36 : 15 - 19
  • [34] Challenges in measuring medication adherence: experiences from a controlled trial
    Stewart, Kay
    Mc Namara, Kevin P.
    George, Johnson
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2014, 36 (01) : 15 - 19
  • [35] Self-administration of medication: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of the impact on dispensing errors, perceptions, and satisfaction
    Sorensen, Charlotte Arp
    Lisby, Marianne
    Olesen, Charlotte
    Enemark, Ulrika
    Sorensen, Signe Bredsgaard
    de Thurah, Annette
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 11
  • [36] Psychiatric outpatients report their experiences as participants in a randomized clinical trial
    Carey, MP
    Morrison-Beedy, D
    Carey, KB
    Maisto, SA
    Gordon, CM
    Pedlow, CT
    JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 2001, 189 (05) : 299 - 306
  • [37] Financial management of a large multisite randomized clinical trial
    Sheffet, Alice J.
    Flaxman, Linda
    Tom, MeeLee
    Hughes, Susan E.
    Longbottom, Mary E.
    Howard, Virginia J.
    Marler, John R.
    Brott, Thomas G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2014, 9 (06) : 811 - 813
  • [38] ImPRECISION Limitations to Interpretation of a Large Randomized Clinical Trial
    FitzGerald, Garret A.
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 135 (02) : 113 - 115
  • [39] Experiences of acupuncturists in a placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial
    McManus, Claire A.
    Kaptchuk, Ted J.
    Schnyer, Rosa N.
    Goldman, Rose
    Kerr, Catherine E.
    Nguyen, Long T.
    Stason, William B.
    JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2007, 13 (05) : 533 - 537
  • [40] Patient safety incidents and medication errors during a clinical trial: experience from a pre-hospital randomized controlled trial of emergency medication administration
    England, Ed
    Deakin, Charles D.
    Nolan, Jerry P.
    Lall, Ranjit
    Quinn, Tom
    Gates, Simon
    Miller, Joshua
    O'Shea, Lyndsey
    Pocock, Helen
    Rees, Nigel
    Scomparin, Charlotte
    Perkins, Gavin D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 76 (10) : 1355 - 1362