Malaysia's Approach to the South China Sea Dispute after the Arbitral Tribunal's Ruling

被引：1

作者：

Parameswaran, Prashanth ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Tufts Univ, Fletcher Sch Law & Diplomacy, Medford, MA 02155 USA

[2] 2400 16th St NW,Apt 516, Washington, DC 20009 USA

来源：

CONTEMPORARY SOUTHEAST ASIA | 2016年 / 38卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

K9 [地理];

学科分类号：

0705 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：375 / 381

页数：7

共 50 条

[31] Malaysia's Dilemmatic South China Sea Policy under Muhyiddin Yassin
Jamil, Nur Shahadah
[J]. EAST ASIAN POLICY, 2021, 13 (03) : 5 - 18
[32] Japan's maritime security interests in Southeast Asia and the South China Sea dispute
Storey, Ian
[J]. POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 65 (02) : 135 - 156
[33] Xi Jinping and PLA Centrality in Beijing's South China Sea Dispute Management
You Ji
[J]. CHINA-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2017, 15 (02) : 1 - 21
[34] The South China Sea dispute revisited
Guan, AC
[J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2000, 54 (02): : 201 - 215
[35] Origins of the South China Sea Dispute
Nguyen Thi Lan Anh
[J]. Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea: Navigating Rough Waters, 2015, : 15 - 35
[36] China's Assertiveness in the South and East China Sea: A Constructivist Approach
Llanos-Antczak, Anna
Phommachanh, Pathummaly
[J]. REVISTA MEXICANA DE CIENCIAS POLITICAS Y SOCIALES, 2022, 67 (244): : 23 - 43
[37] Spratlys: The dispute in the South China Sea
Prescott, V
[J]. INTERNATIONAL HISTORY REVIEW, 1998, 20 (03): : 760 - 761
[38] China's Responses to the Compulsory Arbitration on the South China Sea Dispute: Legal Effects and Policy Options
Yu Mincai
[J]. OCEAN DEVELOPMENT AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2014, 45 (01): : 1 - 16
[39] An Arbitral Tribunal's Dilemma: The Plea of Financially Impecunious Parties
Jun, Gerome Goh Teng
[J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION, 2020, 37 (04): : 479 - 509
[40] The Trump Administration Aligns U.S. Policy with the 2016 South China Sea Ruling
Kraska, James
[J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OCEAN LAW AND POLICY, 2020, 5 (02) : 410 - 412

← 1 2 3 4 5 →