Comparison of Four Techniques to Control Elephant Ear

被引:0
|
作者
Atkins, Eric Owen [1 ]
Williamson, P. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas State Univ, Dept Biol, San Marcos, TX 78666 USA
来源
关键词
Colocasia esculenta; exotic species; glyphosate; invasive species;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Elephant ear (Colocasia esculenta [L.] Schott), introduced to the San Marcos River (Hays County, Texas) in the 1900s, now forms dense stands and dominates many areas previously inhabited by native vegetation. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department lists the plant as an exotic species needing management consideration. Four potential vegetative control techniques (manual removal, application of glyphosate herbicide, mechanical cutting, and a combination of mechanical cutting followed by application of glyphosate to cut petiole) were applied to elephant ear growing in the San Marcos River at five-week intervals for one year. Effectiveness of each technique was evaluated based on three criteria: extent of decrease in elephant car leaf cover, number of treatment applications required to achieve control, and time required to apply technique. Manual removal effectively achieved control with the fewest applications and resulted in the lowest overall elephant ear leaf cover. It also required the least application time. Herbicide application also effectively controlled elephant ear, although the technique required a longer application time and a greater number of applications. Neither mechanical cutting nor combined mechanical cutting/herbicide application resulted in control. Based on the three criteria, both manual removal and herbicide application are effective in controlling elephant ear.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 162
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Drawing an elephant with four complex parameters
    Mayer, Juergen
    Khairy, Khaled
    Howard, Jonathon
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (06) : 648 - 649
  • [42] Comparison of four different staining methods for ear cytology of dogs with otitis externa
    Bouassiba, C.
    Osthold, W.
    Mueller, R. S.
    TIERAERZTLICHE PRAXIS AUSGABE KLEINTIERE HEIMTIERE, 2013, 41 (01): : 7 - 15
  • [43] A comparison of techniques used to estimate body condition of southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina)
    Tierney, M
    Hindell, M
    Lea, MA
    Tollit, D
    WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2001, 28 (06) : 581 - 588
  • [44] A comparison of fuzzy and qualitative control techniques
    delaRosa, JL
    Oller, A
    Melendez, J
    Colomer, J
    Esteva, S
    Ramon, JA
    Pous, C
    Vehi, J
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1996 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL, 1996, : 139 - 144
  • [45] Analytical Comparison of Concurrency Control Techniques
    Zaidi, Nabeel
    Kaushik, Himanshu
    Jain, Deepanshu
    Bansal, Raghav
    Kumar, Praveen
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS DESIGN AND INTELLIGENT APPLICATIONS, INDIA 2017, 2018, 672 : 1012 - 1021
  • [46] Techniques of ear reconstruction
    Naumann, A.
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2007, 86 : S96 - S109
  • [47] Biomechanical Comparison of Four Mandibular Angle Fracture Fixation Techniques
    Munante-Cardenas, Jose Luis
    Passeri, Luis Augusto
    CRANIOMAXILLOFACIAL TRAUMA & RECONSTRUCTION, 2015, 8 (02) : 123 - 128
  • [48] Comparison of four common data collection techniques to elicit preferences
    Anselmi, Pasquale
    Fabbris, Luigi
    Martini, Maria Cristiana
    Robusto, Egidio
    QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2018, 52 (03) : 1227 - 1239
  • [49] Comparison of four corneal pachymetry techniques in corneal refractive surgery
    Javaloy, J
    Vidal, MT
    Villada, JR
    Artola, A
    Alió, JL
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 20 (01) : 29 - 34
  • [50] A RANDOMISED COMPARISON OF THE SAFETY OF FOUR CHEST DRAIN INSERTION TECHNIQUES
    White, Thomas
    Doyle, Alex
    McGuire, Karen
    Moondi, Parvez
    Young, Peter
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (12) : U256 - U256