Evaluation of the Pediatric Craniocervical Junction on MDCT

被引:36
|
作者
Bertozzi, John Christopher [1 ]
Rojas, Carlos Andres [1 ]
Martinez, Carlos Rodrigo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
关键词
atlantooccipital dissociation; atlantooccipital interval; children; craniocervical junction; pediatric imaging; CERVICAL-SPINE INJURIES; ATLANTOOCCIPITAL DISLOCATION; TRAUMA; CHILDREN; CT; INTERVAL; SPECTRUM;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.08.1058
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to establish normal values on MDCT images for the measurement of various craniocervical junction relationships in children and to address discrepancies in the literature based on radiographic values. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Accepted methods of evaluating the craniocervical junction were used to calculate normal values in 117 normal children on MDCT images with multiplanar reconstructions. The basion - axial interval, basion - dens interval, Powers ratio, atlantodental interval, and atlantooccipital interval were measured in each patient and compared with accepted data based on radiographs. RESULTS. The basion - axial interval was difficult to reproduce on MDCT images. In 97.5% of patients, the basion - dens interval was less than 10.5 mm compared with 12 mm based on data from radiographs. Separating the patient population into those in whom the os terminale was ossified and those in whom it was not revealed a difference of 2 mm in the upper limit of normal ( 9.5 and 11.6 mm, respectively). The Powers ratio showed no significant difference compared with data obtained using radiographs. In 97.5% of the population, the atlantodental interval was less than 2.6 mm, compared with 4 - 5 mm measured on radiographs. The atlantooccipital interval showed 97.5% of the population falling below 2.5 mm at any point in the joint space, compared with the previously accepted value of 5 mm. CONCLUSION. Normal values for the craniocervical junction articulations and relationships as seen on MDCT are different from the accepted ranges of normal based on radiographs. The values should be considered the normal values in the pediatric population on MDCT.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 31
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Anatomy of the craniocervical junction - A review
    Charbonneau, Laurence
    Watanabe, Kentaro
    Chaalala, Chiraz
    Bojanowski, Michel W.
    Lavigne, Philippe
    Labidi, Moujahed
    NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2024, 70 (03)
  • [32] SONOGRAPHY OF THE NEONATAL CRANIOCERVICAL JUNCTION
    CRAMER, BC
    JEQUIER, S
    OGORMAN, AM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1986, 147 (01) : 133 - 139
  • [33] Angiomatous Meningioma in the Craniocervical Junction
    Ito, Shunsuke
    Iizuka, Yoichi
    Aihara, Masanori
    Koshi, Hiromi
    Mieda, Tokue
    Takasawa, Eiji
    Ishiwata, Sho
    Tomomatsu, Yusuke
    Honda, Akira
    Inomata, Kazuhiro
    Chikuda, Hirotaka
    CASE REPORTS IN ORTHOPEDICS, 2021, 2021
  • [34] MR IMAGING OF THE CRANIOCERVICAL JUNCTION
    LEE, BCP
    DECK, MDF
    KNEELAND, JB
    CAHILL, PT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 1985, 6 (02) : 209 - 213
  • [35] Spectrum of Craniocervical Junction Injuries
    Punjwani, N.
    Cheekatla, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (05)
  • [36] Pediatric giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath of the craniocervical junction involving the occipital condyle
    Cho, Jin Mo
    Chang, Jong Hee
    Kim, Sun Ho
    Lee, Kyu Sung
    CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2016, 32 (01) : 175 - 179
  • [37] MDCT evaluation of central airway stenosis in pediatric patients
    Lee, EY
    Callahan, MJ
    Siegel, MJ
    Dillon, JE
    Boyer, D
    Mason, K
    Collins, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (04) : 18 - 19
  • [38] Pediatric giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath of the craniocervical junction involving the occipital condyle
    Jin Mo Cho
    Jong Hee Chang
    Sun Ho Kim
    Kyu Sung Lee
    Child's Nervous System, 2016, 32 : 175 - 179
  • [39] Can the Etiopathogenesis of Chiari Malformation Be Craniocervical Junction Stabilization Difference? Morphometric Analysis of Craniocervical Junction Ligaments
    Karaaslan, Burak
    Borcek, Alp Ozgun
    Ucar, Murat
    Aykol, Sukru
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 128 : E1096 - E1101
  • [40] Immersive Surgical Anatomy of the Craniocervical Junction
    Vigo, Vera
    Hirpara, Ankit
    Yassin, Mohamed
    Wang, Minghao
    Chou, Dean
    De Bonis, Pasquale
    Abla, Adib
    Rubio, Roberto Rodriguez
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (09)