The role of response inhibition in temporal preparation: Evidence from a go/no-go task

被引:37
|
作者
Los, Sander A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Cognit Psychol, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Temporal preparation; Response inhibition; Trace conditioning; Foreperiod effects; Sequential effects; SIMPLE REACTION-TIME; EVENT-RELATED FMRI; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CHOICE-REACTION-TIME; NONSPECIFIC PREPARATION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; FOREPERIOD DURATION; MOTOR PREPARATION; UNINTENTIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS; FRONTAL-CORTEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.013
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
During the foreperiod (FP) of a warned reaction task, participants engage in a process of temporal preparation to speed response to the impending target stimulus. Previous neurophysiological studies have shown that inhibition is applied during FP to prevent premature response. Previous behavioral studies have shown that the duration of FP on both the current and the preceding trial codetermine response time to the target. Integrating these findings, the present study tested the hypothesis that the behavioral effects find their origin in response inhibition on the preceding trial. In two experiments the variable-FP paradigm was combined with a go/no-go task, in which no-go stimuli required explicit response inhibition. The resulting data pattern revealed sequential effects of both FP (long or short) and response requirement (go or no-go), which could be jointly understood as expressions of response inhibition, consistent with the hypothesis. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 344
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Go or no-go? An assessment of inhibitory control training using the GO/NO-GO task in adolescents
    van Royen, Annelies
    van Malderen, Eva
    Desmeta, Maurane
    Goossens, Lien
    Verbeken, Sandra
    Kemps, Eva
    [J]. APPETITE, 2022, 179
  • [32] The role of the interaction between the inferior parietal lobule and superior temporal gyrus in the multisensory Go/No-go task
    Sun, Jiaying
    Huang, Jie
    Wang, Aijun
    Zhang, Ming
    Tang, Xiaoyu
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2022, 254
  • [33] Response inhibition on a Go/No-go task in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis patients: an fMRI study
    Lysenko, M.
    Akbar, N.
    Yeh, E. A.
    Banwell, B.
    Till, C.
    [J]. MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2014, 20 : 131 - 131
  • [34] Psychopathic traits, inhibition, and positive and negative emotion: Results from an emotional Go/No-Go task
    Fournier, Lauren F.
    McDonald, Julia B.
    Clayson, Peter E.
    Verona, Edelyn
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 58 (06)
  • [35] Punishment promotes response control deficits in obsessive-compulsive disorder: evidence from a motivational go/no-go task
    Morein-Zamir, S.
    Papmeyer, M.
    Gillan, C. M.
    Crockett, M. J.
    Fineberg, N. A.
    Sahakian, B. J.
    Robbins, T. W.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2013, 43 (02) : 391 - 400
  • [36] The role of emotional interference on learning in an emotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task
    Saylik, Rahmi
    Castiello, Santiago
    Murphy, Robin A.
    [J]. DUSUNEN ADAM-JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 34 (01): : 23 - 31
  • [37] Tracking Self-Control - Task Performance and Pupil Size in a Go/No-Go Inhibition Task
    Timme, Sinika
    Wolff, Wanja
    Englert, Chris
    Brand, Ralf
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [38] Grading odor similarities in a Go/No-Go task
    Kay, Leslie M.
    Krysiak, Magdalena
    Barlas, Lale
    Bloom Edgerton, Gabrielle
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2006, 88 (4-5) : 339 - 346
  • [40] Dissociation of prepotent response inhibition and interference control in problematic internet use: evidence from the Go/No-Go and Flanker tasks
    Zhang, Shao-Shuai
    Zhong, Yu-qing
    Li, Xu
    Peng, Ming
    [J]. BMC PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 12 (01)