Evaluation of an interprofessional continuing professional development course on comprehensive diabetes care: A mixed-methods approach

被引:7
|
作者
Beckman, Darrick [1 ]
Wardian, Jana [2 ]
Sauerwein, Tom J. [2 ]
True, Mark W. [1 ]
机构
[1] San Antonio Mil Med Ctr, Endocrinol Serv, 3551 Roger Brooke Dr, Ft Sam Houston, TX 78253 USA
[2] Wilford Hall USAF Med Ctr, Diabet Ctr Excellence DCOE, Joint Base San Antonio Lackland, 1100 Wilford Hall Loop, Lackland AFB, TX 78236 USA
关键词
evaluation; evidence-based medicine; medical education;
D O I
10.1111/jep.13033
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale Since there are only 33 endocrinologists within the Department of Defence and over 150 000 beneficiaries with diabetes, most patients with diabetes will be treated by primary care providers (PCPs). Comprehensive diabetes care visits are extensive and the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) routinely change; thus, providing current evidence-based care is difficult. Most professional development courses aim to update PCPs on CPGs but are often inadequate as they focus on only the PCPs (not the interdisciplinary team) without a plan to implement changes into practice. Objective To evaluate the biannual (twice yearly), 3-day, interprofessional Diabetes Champion Course (DCC) developed by the US Air Force Diabetes Center of Excellence on comprehensive diabetes care. Methods A mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate three iterations of the DCC course (Sept 2014-Sept 2015). Quantitatively, pre-course and post-course surveys were used to obtain impact on knowledge, skills, and intention to change clinical practice. Qualitatively, semi-structured phone interviews were conducted with participants to obtain benefits to their clinic related to attending the DCC and barriers to implementation of the CPG process improvement project. Results Twelve of 19 responding clinics (63%) reported implementing all or part of their original CPG project developed at the DCC, and 17 of 19 clinics (89%) reported improvements associated with attending the DCC. Post-course surveys, from on location participants, revealed significant improvements in knowledge (P < 0.01). Likewise, foot exam skills and ability to demonstrate glucose meters to patients improved. Even with high pre-course confidence, 97% of providers reported acquiring new knowledge about prescribing and titrating insulin. Conclusion The DCC is innovative as it employs a team-based, interprofessional, didactic, and interactive approach that is effective in improving knowledge, skills, and intention to change clinical practice, which should translate to better care for patients with diabetes.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:148 / 154
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Evaluation of a Virtual Citizen Science Facility: A Comprehensive Mixed-Methods Approach
    Bracey, Georgia
    ENSURING STEM LITERACY: A NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STEM EDUCATION AND PUBLIC OUTREACH, 2014, 483 : 233 - 235
  • [12] Dissecting through barriers: A mixed-methods study on the effect of interprofessional education in a dissection course with healthcare professional students
    Fernandes, Alisha Rebecca
    Palombella, Andrew
    Salfi, Jenn
    Wainman, Bruce
    ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2015, 8 (04) : 305 - 316
  • [13] Having fun and learning: Interprofessional continuing professional development in palliative care
    Bouvette, Maryse
    Hall, Pippa
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2006, 22 (03) : 220 - 220
  • [14] Continuing professional development: pedagogical practices of interprofessional simulation in health care
    Nystrom, Sofia
    Dahlberg, Johanna
    Edelbring, Samuel
    Hult, Hakan
    Dahlgren, Madeleine Abrandt
    STUDIES IN CONTINUING EDUCATION, 2017, 39 (03) : 303 - 319
  • [15] Interprofessional dietary assessment practices in primary care: A mixed-methods study
    Bonilla, Carolina
    Brauer, Paula
    Royall, Dawna
    Keller, Heather
    Hanning, Rhona M.
    DiCenso, Alba
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2016, 30 (01) : 77 - 82
  • [16] Findings from a mixed-methods study of an interprofessional faculty development program
    Abu-Rish Blakeney, Erin
    Pfeifle, Andrea
    Jones, Mandy
    Hall, Leslie Walter
    Zierler, Brenda K.
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2016, 30 (01) : 83 - 89
  • [17] A mixed-methods evaluation of interprofessional education in palliative care: changes in student attitudes towards health professions
    Borchers, Peggy
    Bortz, Martin
    Hoffmann, Henriette
    Seele, Kristin
    Schuebel, Jeannine
    GMS JOURNAL FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 38 (06):
  • [18] Interprofessional education in the clinical learning environment: a mixed-methods evaluation of a longitudinal experience in the primary care setting
    Miselis, Heather H.
    Zawacki, Stacey
    White, Susan
    Yinusa-Nyahkoon, Leanne
    Mostow, Carol
    Furlong, Janice
    Mott, Katherine K.
    Kumar, Anika
    Winter, Michael R.
    Berklein, Flora
    Jack, Brian
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2022, 36 (06) : 845 - 855
  • [19] A Mixed-Methods Analysis in Assessing Students' Professional Development by Applying an Assessment for Learning Approach
    Peeters, Michael J.
    Vaidya, Varun A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2016, 80 (05)
  • [20] Evaluation of the North West London Diabetes Foot Care Transformation Project: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation
    Palladino, Raffaele
    More, Ash
    Greenfield, Geva
    Anokye, Nana
    Pigott, Elizabeth
    Willis, Tony
    Edward, Gregg
    Majeed, Azeem
    Kong, Wing May
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2022, 22 (02):