Agreement between Central Corneal Thickness Measured Using Pentacam, Ultrasound Pachymetry, Specular Microscopy and Optic Biometer Lenstar IS 900 and the Influence of lntraocular Pressure

被引:14
|
作者
Borrego-Sanz, L. [1 ,2 ]
Saenz-Frances, F. [1 ,2 ]
Bermudez-Vallecilla, M. [1 ,2 ]
Morales-Fernandez, L. [1 ,2 ]
Martinez-de-la-Casa, J. M. [1 ,2 ]
Santos-Bueso, E. [1 ,2 ]
Janez, L. [3 ]
Garcia-Feijoo, J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Dept Ophthalmol, Madrid, Spain
[2] Inst Salud Carlos III, Red Temat Invest Cooperat, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Complutense Madrid, Inst Tecnol Conocimiento, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Central corneal thickness; Lenstar; Specular microscopy; Intraocular pressure; OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA; LOW-COHERENCE REFLECTOMETRY; ANTERIOR-CHAMBER DEPTH; SCHEIMPFLUG PHOTOGRAPHY; REPEATABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; PACHOMETRY; TONOMETRY; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1159/000356724
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) values obtained by Lenstar (LE), Pentacam (PC), specular microscopy (SM) and ultrasound pachynnetry (UP) in healthy corneas and study their influence on intraocular pressure (IOP) readings determined by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). Methods: CCT was measured in 76 healthy subjects by LE, PC, SM and UP. We established Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (p-C) between different techniques. The influence of CCT on GAT was established through univariate linear regression models, IOP being the dependent variable. Results: The highest p-C was found between LE and SM at 0.94(95% Cl: 0.91-0.96) and between LE and UP at 0.95 (95% CI:0.94-0.97).IOP readings showed less variability when CCT was determined using LE (7.7%, B = 0.16; 95% Cl: 0.004-0.28). Conclusions: Although CCT values obtained with UP, PC, SM and LE show good correlation, these methods are not completely interchangeable. The amount of IOP variation differs when CCT is determined using LE or SM. (C) 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 235
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Agreement Between Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Ultrasound Pachymetry and Minimal and Central Thicknesses Determined Using the Pentacam
    Saenz-Frances, F.
    Mendez-Hernandez, C.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa, J. M.
    Fernandez-Vidal, A. M.
    Escalada-Ferrandiz, A.
    Santos-Bueso, E.
    Fraile-Maya, J.
    Garcia-Sanchez, J.
    Garcia-Feijoo, J.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [2] Comparison of Pentacam Scheimpflug camera with ultrasound pachymetry and 0 noncontact specular Microscopy in measuring central corneal thickness
    Fujioka, Miyuki
    Nakamura, Makoto
    Tatsumi, Yasuko
    Kusuhara, Azusa
    Maeda, Hidetaka
    Negi, Akira
    [J]. CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2007, 32 (02) : 89 - 94
  • [3] Agreement between Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Pentacam Scheimpflug Camera, Noncontact Specular Microscopy, and Ultrasonographic Pachymetry in Diabetic Patients
    Altay, Yesim
    Balta, Ozgur
    Demirok, Gulizar
    Burcu, Ayse
    Balta, Oyku Bezen
    Ornek, Firdevs
    [J]. CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2017, 42 (02) : 187 - 194
  • [4] Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements between Noncontact Specular Microscopy and Ultrasound Pachymetry
    Ohn, Kyoung
    Lee, Mee Yon
    Lee, Young Chun
    Shin, Hye Young
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 60 (07): : 635 - 642
  • [5] Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by specular microscopy, ultrasound pachymetry, and ultrasound biomicroscopy
    Tam, ES
    Rootman, DS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 29 (06): : 1179 - 1184
  • [6] Comparison of central corneal thickness as measured by non-contact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry before and post LASIK
    Zhao, Ming-Hui
    Zou, Jun
    Wang, Wen-Qing
    Li, Jun
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 35 (09): : 818 - 823
  • [7] Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness and Anterior Chamber Depth Measured Using LenStar LS900, Pentacam, and Visante AS-OCT
    O'Donnell, Clare
    Hartwig, Andreas
    Radhakrishnan, Hema
    [J]. CORNEA, 2012, 31 (09) : 983 - 988
  • [8] Agreement and repeatability of central thickness measurement in normal corneas using ultrasound pachymetry and the OCULUS pentacam
    O'Donnell, C
    Maldonado-Codina, C
    [J]. CORNEA, 2005, 24 (08) : 920 - 924
  • [9] Corneal thickness measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes:: Pentacam comprehensive eye scanner versus noncontact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry
    Ucakhan, Oemur Oezlenen
    Oezkan, Muhip
    Kanpolat, Ayfer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 32 (06): : 970 - 977
  • [10] Comparison of central corneal thickness in corneal edema by ultrasound pachymetry, specular microscopy, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography
    Artuc, Tuncay
    Batur, Muhammed
    [J]. SAUDI JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 37 (01) : 1 - 5