Site Productivity and Forest Carbon Stocks in the United States: Analysis and Implications for Forest Offset Project Planning

被引:5
|
作者
Hoover, Coeli M. [1 ]
Smith, James E. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Forest Serv, USDA, No Res Stn, Durham, NH USA
关键词
Forest Inventory and Analysis database; soil moisture regime; aboveground live biomass carbon; site productivity; ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS; STANDS; PINE;
D O I
10.3390/f3020283
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The documented role of United States forests in sequestering carbon, the relatively low cost of forest-based mitigation, and the many co-benefits of increasing forest carbon stocks all contribute to the ongoing trend in the establishment of forest-based carbon offset projects. We present a broad analysis of forest inventory data using site quality indicators to provide guidance to managers planning land acquisition for forest-based greenhouse gas mitigation projects. Specifically, we summarize two condition class indicators of site productivity within the FIA forest inventory database-PHYSCLCD and SITECLCD-as they relate to current aboveground live tree carbon stocks. Average carbon density is higher on more productive sites, but compared to the overall variability among sites, the differences are relatively small for all but the highest and lowest site classes. Some minor differences in eastern-versus western-forests were apparent in terms of how carbon on the least productive sites differed from most other forest land over time. Overall results suggest that xeric sites in most regions as well as sites that correspond to the lowest, non-productive classifications of forest land should preferentially not be used forestry-based greenhouse gas mitigation projects, but all other forest areas appear to be suitable.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 299
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Family Forest Landowners' Interest in Forest Carbon Offset Programs: Focus Group Findings from the Lake States, USA
    Miller, Kristell A.
    Snyder, Stephanie A.
    Kilgore, Mike A.
    Davenport, Mae A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 54 (06) : 1399 - 1411
  • [42] Family Forest Landowners’ Interest in Forest Carbon Offset Programs: Focus Group Findings from the Lake States, USA
    Kristell A. Miller
    Stephanie A. Snyder
    Mike A. Kilgore
    Mae A. Davenport
    Environmental Management, 2014, 54 : 1399 - 1411
  • [43] Land use and general equilibrium implications of a forest-based carbon sequestration policy in the United States
    Monge, Juan J.
    Bryant, Henry L.
    Gan, Jianbang
    Richardson, James W.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 127 : 102 - 120
  • [44] Analysis of the production and transaction costs of forest carbon offset projects in the USA
    Galik, Christopher S.
    Cooley, David M.
    Baker, Justin S.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 112 : 128 - 136
  • [45] Stakeholders of Voluntary Forest Carbon Offset Projects in China: An Empirical Analysis
    Lin, Derong
    Lin, Yingzhi
    ADVANCES IN METEOROLOGY, 2015, 2015
  • [46] THE IMPLICATIONS OF WORK FORCE DIVERSIFICATION IN THE UNITED-STATES-FOREST-SERVICE
    BROWN, G
    HARRIS, CC
    ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 1993, 25 (01) : 85 - 113
  • [47] Impacts of land use on Indian mangrove forest carbon stocks: Implications for conservation and management
    Bhomia, R. K.
    MacKenzie, R. A.
    Murdiyarso, D.
    Sasmito, S. D.
    Purbopuspito, J.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2016, 26 (05) : 1396 - 1408
  • [48] Advances in remote sensing technology and implications for measuring and monitoring forest carbon stocks and change
    Goetz, Scott
    Dubayah, Ralph
    CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2011, 2 (03) : 231 - 244
  • [49] Wildfire combustion and carbon stocks in the southern Canadian boreal forest: Implications for a warming world
    Dieleman, Catherine M.
    Rogers, Brendan M.
    Potter, Stefano
    Veraverbeke, Sander
    Johnstone, Jill F.
    Laflamme, Jocelyne
    Solvik, Kylen
    Walker, Xanthe J.
    Mack, Michelle C.
    Turetsky, Merritt R.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2020, 26 (11) : 6062 - 6079
  • [50] Could increased boreal forest ecosystem productivity offset carbon losses from increased disturbances?
    Kurz, Werner A.
    Stinson, Graham
    Rampley, Greg
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 363 (1501) : 2261 - 2269