Volume Perimetry: Measurement in Depth of Visual Field Loss

被引:10
|
作者
Satgunam, PremNandhini
Apfelbaum, Henry L.
Peli, Eli [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Schepens Eye Res Inst, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
visual field defects; vision impairment; hemianopia; functional vision; bitemporal; binasal; EYES;
D O I
10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182678df8
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. Volume scotomas are three-dimensional regions of space that are not visible to the observer. Volume perimetry maps volume scotomas. Volume scotomas predicted from combining monocular visual fields assume known fixation locus (mainly foveal). However, fixation loci are not always known, especially with central field loss (CFL). Here we demonstrate methods for measuring and calculating volume scotomas and discuss their practical implications. Methods. Three patients (bitemporal hemianopia, binasal scotoma, and CFL) were evaluated. Slices through the volume scotomas were measured at three distances: at the plane of fixation, at a plane anterior to fixation (representing anterior volume perimetry), and at a plane posterior to fixation (representing posterior volume perimetry). For anterior volume perimetry, patients fixated on a screen 100 cm away through a beamsplitter that reflected the perimetric stimulus (at 50 cm). For posterior volume perimetry, patients fixated on a near target (50 cm), while perimetric stimuli were presented on a screen 150 cm beyond fixation. At the plane of fixation, monocular visual fields under binocular viewing conditions were measured using a computerized dichoptic perimeter. Results. Posterior and anterior volume scotomas were documented in patients with bitemporal hemianopia and binasal scotomas, respectively. The CFL patient demonstrated both anterior and posterior volume scotomas. Scotoma magnitude was considered to determine its effect on visual function. Conclusions. Direct measurement of volume scotomas can be performed. Anterior and posterior volume visual fields can vary substantially from conventional binocular perimetry measured at the fixation plane, revealing blind areas not otherwise identified. These volume scotomas are likely to impair functional vision such as driving (for bitemporal hemianopes) and near work with small hand tools (for binasal scotomas). Patients with CFL will have impaired functional vision for both distance and near tasks. Consideration of volume scotomas can help provide more effective vision rehabilitation and counseling. (Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:E1265-E1275)
引用
收藏
页码:E1265 / E1275
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Which method of flicker perimetry is most effective for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss?
    Yoshiyama, KK
    Johnson, CA
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1997, 38 (11) : 2270 - 2277
  • [42] Extended depth of field for visual measurement systems with depth-invariant magnification
    Zhao, Yanyu
    Qu, Yufu
    OPTICAL METROLOGY AND INSPECTION FOR INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS II, 2012, 8563
  • [43] Detection of early visual field loss in glaucoma using frequency-doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry
    Landers, JA
    Goldberg, I
    Graham, SL
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 121 (12) : 1705 - 1710
  • [44] Quantitative Measurement of Fixation Stability During RareBit Perimetry and Humphrey Visual Field Testing
    Lin, Shawn R.
    Lai, Isabella N.
    Dutta, Sanjeev
    Singh, Kuldev
    Chang, Robert T.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2015, 24 (02) : 100 - 104
  • [45] CONFRONTATION VISUAL-FIELD LOSS AS A FUNCTION OF DECIBEL SENSITIVITY LOSS ON AUTOMATED STATIC PERIMETRY - IMPLICATIONS ON THE ACCURACY OF CONFRONTATION VISUAL-FIELD (CVF) TESTING
    SHAHINFAR, S
    JOHNSON, LN
    MADSEN, RW
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1995, 36 (04) : S454 - S454
  • [46] Visual Function-Specific Perimetry to Identify Glaucomatous Visual Loss Using Three Different Definitions of Visual Field Abnormality
    Tafreshi, Ali
    Sample, Pamela A.
    Liebmann, Jeffrey M.
    Girkin, Christopher A.
    Zangwill, Linda M.
    Weinreb, Robert N.
    Lalezary, Maziar
    Racette, Lyne
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2009, 50 (03) : 1234 - 1240
  • [47] Comparison of SLO perimetry, binocular perimetry, and functional visual field Perimetry in patients with macular scotomas
    Schuchard, RA
    Cummings, R
    Ross, D
    Watson, G
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2003, 44 : U49 - U49
  • [48] Adaptive kinetic perimetry of the peripheral visual field
    Bain, Catherine
    Marin-Franch, Ivan
    Malik, Rizwan
    McNaught, Andrew Ian
    Bunn, Lisa
    Artes, Paul H.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (09)
  • [49] Visual field indices for frequency doubling perimetry
    Cello, KE
    Johnson, CA
    NelsonQuigg, JM
    Samuels, SJ
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1997, 38 (04) : 2659 - 2659
  • [50] Quantification of the Visual Field Loss in Retinitis Pigmentosa Using Semi-Automated Kinetic Perimetry
    Nowomiejska, Katarzyna
    Brzozowska, Agnieszka
    Koss, Michael J.
    Weleber, Richard G.
    Schiefer, Ulrich
    Rejdak, Konrad
    Juenemann, Anselm G.
    Maciejewski, Ryszard
    Rejdak, Robert
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2016, 41 (07) : 993 - 998