Identification of airborne bacteria by 16S rDNA sequencing, MALDI-TOF MS and the MIDI microbial identification system

被引:26
|
作者
Fykse, Else Marie [1 ]
Tjarnhage, Torbjorn [2 ]
Humppi, Tarmo [3 ]
Eggen, Vilde Sorvik [1 ]
Ingebretsen, Andre [4 ]
Skogan, Gunnar [1 ]
Olofsson, Goran [2 ]
Wasterby, Par [2 ]
Gradmark, Per-Ake [2 ]
Larsson, Anders [2 ]
Dybwad, Marius [1 ]
Blatny, Janet Martha [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Def Res Estab FFI, N-2027 Kjeller, Norway
[2] Swedish Def Res Agcy FOI, Umea, Sweden
[3] CBRN Def PvTT, Def Forces Tech Res Ctr, Lakiala, Finland
[4] Oslo Univ Hosp, Rikshosp, Oslo, Sweden
关键词
Airborne bacteria; Identification; 16S rDNA sequencing; MALDI-TOF MS; MIDI MIS analysis; DESORPTION IONIZATION-TIME; FLIGHT MASS-SPECTROMETRY; TEMPORAL VARIABILITY; LEGIONELLA BACTERIA; AEROSOL-PARTICLES; AIR; DIVERSITY; URBAN; ENVIRONMENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10453-015-9363-9
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to collect and identify airborne bacteria in Norway, Sweden and Finland and to compare three different technologies for identifying collected airborne bacterial isolates: the "gold standard" method 16S rDNA sequencing, MALDI-TOF MS using the MALDI Biotyper 2.0 and the MIDI Sherlock(A (R)) Microbial Identification System (MIDI MIS system). Airborne bacteria were collected during three different periods from May to October 2009 using air sampling directly on agar plates. A total of 140 isolates were collected during three sampling campaigns, and 74 % (103) of these isolates were analyzed by all three methods. The dominant genera in Norway and Finland were the gram-positive bacteria Bacillus and Staphylococcus, whereas the gram-negative bacterium Acinetobacter was the dominant genus in Sweden. Using 16S rDNA sequencing, MALDI-TOF MS and MIDI MIS analysis, 83, 79 and 75 %, respectively, of the isolates were identified and assigned to order or higher taxonomic levels. In this study, the MALDI-TOF MS combining with the MALDI Biotyper 2.0 classification tool was demonstrated to be a fast and reliable alternative for identifying the airborne bacterial isolates. These studies have increased knowledge about the airborne bacterial background in outdoor air, which can be useful for evaluating and improving the operational performance of biological detectors in various environments. To our knowledge, this is the first time that 16S rDNA sequencing, MALDI-TOF MS and MIDI MIS analysis technologies have been compared for their efficiency in identifying airborne bacteria.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 281
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Application of MALDI-TOF MS for identification of environmental bacteria: A review
    Ashfaq, Mohammad Y.
    Da'na, Dana A.
    Al-Ghouti, Mohammad A.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 305
  • [22] Comparison of of VITEK 2, MALDI-TOF MS, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and whole-genome sequencing for identification of Roseomonas mucosa
    Rudolph, Wolfram W.
    Gunzer, Florian
    Trauth, Melanie
    Bunk, Boyke
    Bigge, Richard
    Schroettner, Percy
    MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS, 2019, 134
  • [23] Selection of experimental conditions for the identification of bacteria by MALDI-TOF MS
    Pryshchepa, Oleksandra
    Zloch, Michal
    Pauter, Katarzyna
    Szultka-Mlynska, Malgorzata
    Pomastowsk, Pawel
    Buszewski, Boguslaw
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS CONFERENCE MODERN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2019, : 45 - 50
  • [24] Identification of Anaerobic Bacteria Using MALDI-TOF MS Bruker Biotyper System
    Hsu, Y-M S.
    Burnham, C-A D.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2012, 92 : 387A - 387A
  • [25] Identification of Anaerobic Bacteria Using MALDI-TOF MS Bruker Biotyper System
    Hsu, Y-M S.
    Burnham, C-A D.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2012, 25 : 387A - 387A
  • [26] Application of MALDI-TOF MS to rapid identification of anaerobic bacteria
    Ying Li
    Mingzhu Shan
    Zuobin Zhu
    Xuhua Mao
    Mingju Yan
    Ying Chen
    Qiuju Zhu
    Hongchun Li
    Bing Gu
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 19
  • [27] Analysis of bacteria associated with honeys of different geographical and botanical origin using two different identification approaches: MALDI-TOF MS and 16S rDNA PCR technique
    Pomastowski, Pawel
    Zloch, Michal
    Rodzik, Agnieszka
    Ligor, Magda
    Kostrzewa, Markus
    Buszewski, Boguslaw
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (05):
  • [28] Comparison of two different fully automated bacterial identification systems (Vitek2, MicroScan) and 16S rDNA sequencing with the MALDI-TOF
    Lensing, C.
    Fenner, I.
    Mueller, H.
    Fenner, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 299 : 7 - 7
  • [29] Identification of clinical isolates of α-haemolytic streptococci by 16S rRNA gene sequencing, MALDI-TOF MS by MALDI Biotyper and conventional phenotypic methods - a comparison
    Davies, A. P.
    Reid, M.
    Hadfield, S. J.
    Johnston, S.
    Mikhail, J.
    Harris, L. G.
    Jenkinson, H. F.
    Berry, N.
    Lewis, A. M.
    El-Bouri, K.
    Mack, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 302 : 112 - 112
  • [30] Comparative evaluation of MALDI-TOF MS and 16S rRNA gene sequencing for the identification of clinically relevant anaerobic bacteria. Critical evaluation of discrepant results
    Cobo, Fernando
    Perez-Carrasco, Virginia
    Martin-Hita, Lina
    Garcia-Salcedo, Jose Antonio
    Navarro-Mari, Jose Maria
    ANAEROBE, 2023, 82