The Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale (URCS): Reliability and Validity Evidence for a New Measure of Relationship Closeness

被引:156
|
作者
Dibble, Jayson L. [1 ]
Levine, Timothy R. [2 ]
Park, Hee Sun [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Dept Communicol, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Commun, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
interpersonal relationships; closeness; intimacy; measurement; INTIMACY; SELF;
D O I
10.1037/a0026265
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A fundamental dimension along which all social and personal relationships vary is closeness. The Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale (URCS) is a 12-item self-report scale measuring the closeness of social and personal relationships. The reliability and validity of the URCS were assessed with college dating couples (N = 192), female friends and strangers (N = 330), friends (N = 170), and family members (N = 155). The results show that the scale is unidimensional, with high reliability across relationship types (M alpha = .96). Evidence consistent with validity included substantial within-couple agreement for the romantic couples (intraclass correlation = .41), substantial friend stranger discrimination for the female friends (eta(2) = .82), and measurement invariance across relationship types. Evidence of convergent and divergent validity was obtained for inclusion of other in the self and relational satisfaction, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 572
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Closeness and Control: Exploring the Relationship Between Prayer and Mental Health
    Jeppsen, Benjamin
    Poessel, Patrick
    Black, Stephanie Winkeljohn
    Bjerg, Annie
    Wooldridge, Don
    COUNSELING AND VALUES, 2015, 60 (02) : 164 - 185
  • [32] Relationship quality and social network closeness of adolescent sexual partners
    Aalsma, MC
    Fortenberry, JD
    Orr, DP
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2002, 30 (02) : 93 - 93
  • [33] Relationship closeness as including other in the self: Cognitive underpinnings and measures
    Aron, A
    Fraley, B
    SOCIAL COGNITION, 1999, 17 (02) : 140 - 160
  • [34] Attributions of human-avatar relationship closeness in a virtual community
    Zhao, Yi
    Wang, Weiquan
    EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5288 : 61 - 69
  • [35] Relationship closeness predicts unsolicited advice giving in supportive interactions
    Feng, Bo
    Magen, Eran
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2016, 33 (06) : 751 - 767
  • [36] An Exploratory Analysis of Critical Incidents of Closeness in the Mother/Son Relationship
    Morman, Mark T.
    Whitely, Marianna
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY COMMUNICATION, 2012, 12 (01) : 22 - 39
  • [37] Reading nonverbal cues to emotions: The advantages and liabilities of relationship closeness
    Sternglanz, RW
    DePaulo, BM
    JOURNAL OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR, 2004, 28 (04) : 245 - 266
  • [38] Age Difference in the Effect of Relationship Closeness on Interpersonal Escalating Commitment
    Wu, Jingxuan
    Wen, Xiaoning
    Liu, Xueping
    Jin, Menghan
    Peng, Huamao
    JOURNAL OF ADULT DEVELOPMENT, 2025, 32 (01) : 15 - 15
  • [39] The flexible nature of everyday reciprocity: reciprocity, helping, and relationship closeness
    Marian M. Adams
    Joan G. Miller
    Motivation and Emotion, 2022, 46 : 461 - 475
  • [40] Relationship Satisfaction, Feelings of Closeness and Annoyance, and Linkage in Electrodermal Activity
    Timmons, Adela C.
    Han, Sohyun C.
    Chaspari, Theodora
    Kim, Yehsong
    Narayanan, Shrikanth
    Duong, Jacqueline B.
    Fiallo, Natalia Simo
    Margolin, Gayla
    EMOTION, 2023, 23 (07) : 1815 - 1828