Sperm subpopulations in avian species: a comparative study between the rooster (Gallus domesticus) and Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris)

被引:19
|
作者
Garcia-Herreros, Manuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Secretariat Higher Educ Sci Technol & Innova, Quito, Ecuador
关键词
Gallus domesticus; Numida meleagris; principal component analysis; sperm morphometry; sperm subpopulations; BROILER BREEDER MALES; ARTIFICIAL-INSEMINATION; MORPHOMETRIC SUBPOPULATIONS; TURKEY SEMEN; SPERMATOZOA; QUALITY; STORAGE; MORPHOLOGY; FERTILITY; SELECTION;
D O I
10.4103/1008-682X.188448
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
The main aims of this research were to study possible differences in objective morphometric sperm characteristics, establish normative sperm morphometry standards, and evaluate the presumed different subpopulation distribution of avian spermatozoa from the rooster (Gallus domesticus ) and Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris ) as model avian species. Seventy-two ejaculates (36 per species studied) were obtained manually, following a training period involving gently combined dorso-abdominal and lumbo-sacral massage of the birds. Ejaculates were processed for volume, sperm concentration, viability, motility, and morphology. Moreover, samples were submitted for sperm morphometric assessment using objective Computer-Assisted Semen Analysis for Morphometry (CASA-Morph) methods, with sperm morphometric descriptors evaluated by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and multivariate clustering analyses. There were several differences observed between the avian species in values obtained for ejaculate volume and sperm concentration (P < 0.001). Irrespective of species, PCA revealed two Principal Components (PCs) explaining more than 80% of the variance. In addition, the number of subpopulations differed with species (three and five subpopulations for rooster and Guinea fowl, respectively). Moreover, the distribution of the sperm subpopulations was found to be structurally different between species. In conclusion, our findings from using CASA-Morph methods indicate pronounced sperm morphometric variation between these two avian species. Because of the strong differences observed in morphometric parameter values and their subpopulation distribution, these results suggest that application of objective analytical methods such as CASA-Morph could substantially improve the reliability of comparative studies and help establish valid normative sperm morphological values for avian species.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 894
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [41] Avian comparative genomics: reciprocal chromosome painting between domestic chicken (Gallus gallus) and the stone curlew (Burhinus oedicnemus, Charadriiformes) - An atypical species with low diploid number
    Nie, Wenhui
    O'Brien, Patricia C. M.
    Ng, Bee L.
    Fu, Beiyuan
    Volobouev, Vitaly
    Carter, Nigel P.
    Ferguson-Smith, Malcolm A.
    Yang, Fengtang
    CHROMOSOME RESEARCH, 2009, 17 (01) : 99 - 113
  • [42] Avian comparative genomics: reciprocal chromosome painting between domestic chicken (Gallus gallus) and the stone curlew (Burhinus oedicnemus, Charadriiformes)—An atypical species with low diploid number
    Wenhui Nie
    Patricia C. M. O’Brien
    Bee L. Ng
    Beiyuan Fu
    Vitaly Volobouev
    Nigel P. Carter
    Malcolm A. Ferguson-Smith
    Fengtang Yang
    Chromosome Research, 2009, 17 : 99 - 113
  • [43] A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF DNA AMOUNT AND NUCLEAR DRY-WEIGHT IN 4 DIFFERENT SPECIES (RANA-CATESBEIANA, SALMO-GAIRDNERI, GALLUS-DOMESTICUS AND HOMO-SAPIENS)
    MIKEL, UV
    BAHR, GF
    COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY B-BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1993, 104 (04): : 743 - 746
  • [44] COCULTURES OF RAT AND GUINEA-PIG HEPATOCYTES USED FOR THE STUDY OF SPECIES-DIFFERENCES IN THE PROLIFERATION OF PEROXISOMES .1. DISTINCTION BETWEEN HEPATOCYTE SUBPOPULATIONS BY CATALASE CYTOCHEMISTRY
    MAIER, M
    PILL, J
    VOLKL, A
    FAHIMI, HD
    ACTA HISTOCHEMICA ET CYTOCHEMICA, 1992, 25 (1-2) : 39 - 44
  • [45] SPECIES-DIFFERENCES IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF CENTRAL 5-HT1 BINDING-SITES - A COMPARATIVE AUTORADIOGRAPHIC STUDY BETWEEN RAT AND GUINEA-PIG
    SIJBESMA, H
    SCHIPPER, J
    CORNELISSEN, JCHM
    DEKLOET, ER
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 1991, 555 (02) : 295 - 304