The impact of paying treatment providers for outcomes: difference-in-differences analysis of the "payment by results for drugs recovery' pilot

被引:20
|
作者
Mason, Thomas [1 ]
Sutton, Matthew [1 ]
Whittaker, William [1 ]
McSweeney, Tim [3 ]
Millar, Tim [2 ]
Donmall, Michael [2 ]
Jones, Andrew [2 ]
Pierce, Matthias [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester Ctr Hlth Econ, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Natl Drug Evidence Ctr, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[3] Univ London, Inst Criminal Policy Res, Birkbeck, London WC1E 7HU, England
关键词
Difference-in-differences; drugs policy; multi-level modelling; pay-for-performance; payment-by-results; performance measurement; policy analysis; random effects; unintended consequences; PERFORMANCE; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/add.12920
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
AimsTo estimate the effect on drug misuse treatment completion of a pilot scheme to pay service providers according to rates of recovery. DesignA controlled, quasi-experimental (difference-in-differences) observational study using multi-level random effects logistic regression. SettingDrug misuse treatment providers in all 149 commissioning areas in England in the financial years 2011-12 and 2012-13. ParticipantsService users treated in England in 2011-12 and 2012-13. Intervention and comparatorsLinkage of provider payments to performance indicators in eight pilot commissioning areas in England compared with all 141 non-pilot commissioning areas in England. MeasurementsRecovery was measured by successful completion of treatment (free from drugs of dependence) and engagement with services was measured by rates of declining to continue with treatment. FindingsFollowing the introduction of the pilot scheme, service users treated in pilot areas were 1.3 percentage points [odds ratio (OR)=0.859; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.788, 0.937] less likely to complete treatment compared with those treated in comparison areas. Service users treated in pilot areas were 0.9 percentage points (OR=2.934; 95% CI=2.094, 4.113) more likely to decline to continue with treatment compared with those treated in comparison areas. ConclusionsIn the first year of the pilot Payment by Results for Drugs Recovery' scheme in England, linking payments to outcomes reduced the probability of completing drug misuse treatment and increased the proportion service users declining to continue with treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:1120 / 1128
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of Provider Payment Structure on Obstetric Interventions and Outcomes: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis
    Pirwany, Imran
    Wood, Stephen
    Skiffington, Janice
    Metcalfe, Amy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2020, 42 (07) : 874 - 880
  • [2] Did paying drugs misuse treatment providers for outcomes lead to unintended consequences for hospital admissions? Difference-in-differences analysis of a pay-for-performance scheme in England
    Mason, Thomas
    Whittaker, William
    Jones, Andrew
    Sutton, Matt
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2021, 116 (11) : 3082 - 3093
  • [3] Has payment by results affected the way that English hospitals provide care? Difference-in-differences analysis
    Farrar, Shelley
    Yi, Deokhee
    Sutton, Matt
    Chalkley, Martin
    Sussex, Jon
    Scott, Anthony
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 339 : 554 - 556
  • [4] Does paying service providers by results improve recovery outcomes for drug misusers in treatment in England?
    Jones, Andrew
    Pierce, Matthias
    Sutton, Matt
    Mason, Thomas
    Millar, Tim
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2018, 113 (02) : 279 - 286
  • [5] The Impact of Lockdown on Hotel Performance: A Difference-in-Differences analysis for the US
    Polemis, Michael
    Oikonomou, Aikaterina
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2021, 41 (04): : 2625 - 2634
  • [6] The impact of safety nets on technology adoption: a difference-in-differences analysis
    Alem, Yonas
    Broussard, Nzinga H.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 49 (01) : 13 - 24
  • [7] Impact of Refugees on Local Health Systems: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis in Cameroon
    Tatah, Lambed
    Delbiso, Tefera Darge
    Rodriguez-Llanes, Jose Manuel
    Cuesta, Julita Gil
    Guha-Sapir, Debarati
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (12):
  • [8] The Oncology Care Model and Adherence to Oral Cancer Drugs: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis
    Keating, Nancy L.
    Brooks, Gabriel A.
    Landrum, Mary Beth
    Liu, Pang-Hsiang
    Wolf, Robert
    Riedel, Lauren E.
    Kapadia, Nirav S.
    Jhatakia, Shalini
    Tripp, Amanda
    Simon, Carol
    Hsu, Van Doren
    Kummet, Colleen M.
    Hassol, Andrea
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2022, 114 (06) : 871 - 877
  • [9] A spatial difference-in-differences analysis of the impact of sugarcane production on respiratory diseases
    Chagas, Andre L. S.
    Azzoni, Carlos R.
    Almeida, Alexandre N.
    [J]. REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2016, 59 : 24 - 36
  • [10] Partial fiscal decentralization reforms and educational outcomes: A difference-in-differences analysis for Spain
    Salinas, Paula
    Sole-Olle, Albert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2018, 107 : 31 - 46