The impact of safety nets on technology adoption: a difference-in-differences analysis

被引:19
|
作者
Alem, Yonas [1 ]
Broussard, Nzinga H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Econ, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Millennium Challenge Corp, Washington, DC 20005 USA
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Safety net; Fertilizer use; Inverse propensity score weighting; FOOD AID; RURAL ETHIOPIA; CREDIT CONSTRAINTS; PROPENSITY SCORE; FERTILIZER USE; RISK; CONSUMPTION; INSURANCE; PROGRAM; MARKETS;
D O I
10.1111/agec.12392
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
This article contributes to a growing body of empirical literature relating credit constraints and incomplete insurance to investment decisions. We use panel data from rural Ethiopia to investigate whether participation in a safety net program enhances fertilizer adoption. Using a difference-in-differences estimator and inverse propensity score weighting, we find that participation in Ethiopia's food-for-work (FFW) program increased fertilizer adoption in the short run, but not in the long run. Results also indicate that the intensity of fertilizer usage increased with livestock holdings for FFW-participant households, providing some evidence that the intervention helped asset-rich farm households more than asset-poor households. We find no significant effects of free distribution on fertilizer adoption or intensification. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that safety nets can be viewed as mechanisms that allow households to take on more risk to pursue higher profits. The results highlight the importance of safety net programs, their effectiveness in ensuring farmers that they will be protected against uninsured shocks, and how that assurance can translate into productivity-enhancing behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 24
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Design-based analysis in Difference-In-Differences settings with staggered adoption
    Athey, Susan
    Imbens, Guido W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2022, 226 (01) : 62 - 79
  • [2] An empirical assessment of the impact of subsidies on EV adoption in China: A difference-in-differences approach
    Zheng, Xuemei
    Menezes, Flavio
    Zheng, Xiaofeng
    Wu, Chengkuan
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2022, 162 : 121 - 136
  • [3] An empirical assessment of the impact of subsidies on EV adoption in China: A difference-in-differences approach
    Zheng, Xuemei
    Menezes, Flavio
    Zheng, Xiaofeng
    Wu, Chengkuan
    [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2022, 162 : 121 - 136
  • [4] Impact evaluation using Difference-in-Differences
    Fredriksson, Anders
    de Oliveira, Gustavo Magalhaes
    [J]. RAUSP MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 54 (04): : 519 - 532
  • [5] The Impact of Lockdown on Hotel Performance: A Difference-in-Differences analysis for the US
    Polemis, Michael
    Oikonomou, Aikaterina
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2021, 41 (04): : 2625 - 2634
  • [6] A Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Health, Safety, and Greening Vacant Urban Space
    Branas, Charles C.
    Cheney, Rose A.
    MacDonald, John M.
    Tam, Vicky W.
    Jackson, Tara D.
    Ten Have, Thomas R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 174 (11) : 1296 - 1306
  • [7] Impact of Refugees on Local Health Systems: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis in Cameroon
    Tatah, Lambed
    Delbiso, Tefera Darge
    Rodriguez-Llanes, Jose Manuel
    Cuesta, Julita Gil
    Guha-Sapir, Debarati
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (12):
  • [8] A spatial difference-in-differences analysis of the impact of sugarcane production on respiratory diseases
    Chagas, Andre L. S.
    Azzoni, Carlos R.
    Almeida, Alexandre N.
    [J]. REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2016, 59 : 24 - 36
  • [9] Identification of quantile treatment effects in difference-in-differences settings with staggered adoption
    Li, Xiaofeng
    Lin, Lihua
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2024, 241
  • [10] Augmented Difference-in-Differences
    Li, Kathleen T.
    Van den Bulte, Christophe
    [J]. MARKETING SCIENCE, 2023, 42 (04) : 746 - 767