Shared pollinators and sequential flowering phenologies in two sympatric cactus species

被引:6
|
作者
Arroyo-Perez, Erika [1 ,2 ]
Jimenez-Sierra, Cecilia L. [2 ]
Zavala Hurtado, J. Alejandro [2 ]
Flores, Joel [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Metropolitans, Ciencias Biol & Salud, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Univ Autonoma Metropolitana, Dept Biol, Lab Ecol, Unidad Iztapalapa, Av San Rafael Atlixco 186, Mexico City 04390, DF, Mexico
[3] Inst Potosino Invest Cient & Tecnol, Div Ciencias Ambientales, Camino Presa San Jose 2055,Colonia Lomas 4a, San Luis Potosi 78216, San Luis Potosi, Mexico
关键词
Bees; breeding systems; coexistence; mating systems; reproductive phenology; REPRODUCTIVE-SYSTEM; APIS-MELLIFERA; CACTACEAE; POLLEN; BEES; HYMENOPTERA; VISITATION; HONEYBEES; INDICATOR; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.5091/plecevo.2021.1544
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Background and aims - The reproductive characteristics of sympatric Cactaceae are important because they help to understand interfering or facilitating mechanisms that allow their coexistence. Globose Cactaceae show melittophily flowers that may be attractive to a shared set of pollinators, and if the flowering events are not overlapping, flower resources could be present for the pollinators through time. Ariocarpus kotschoubeyanus and Neolloydia conoidea are two sympatric cactus species in the southern Chihuahuan Desert. The objective of this study is to describe and compare some reproductive characteristics of these species. Material and methods - Individuals of Ariocarpus kotschoubeyanus and Neolloydia conoidea (n = 231 and 212, respectively) were marked and monitored during one year, recording for each species, the floral phenology, behaviour and morphology, flower visitors, breeding and mating systems (through pollination experiments). Key results - The flowering periods of these species do not overlap. The flowers of both species are melittophily, with the same shape, colour, and similar behaviour; both are obligate xenogamous plants. The mating system of Neolloydia conoidea is outcrossing but mixed in Ariocarpus kotschoubeyanus. They share 75% of pollinators (solitary and social bees). Conclusions - The temporal blooming separation of these species could be an important factor to facilitate coexistence within the xerophyte community since they share the same set of pollinators to achieve their reproductive success.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:28 / 38
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of pollinators and flower bud herbivores on reproductive success of two ericaceous woody species differing in flowering season
    Osada, N
    Sugiura, S
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 2006, 84 (01): : 112 - 119
  • [22] Pollinators, flowering phenology and floral longevity in two Mediterranean Aristolochia species, with a review of flower visitor records for the genus
    Berjano, R.
    Ortiz, P. L.
    Arista, M.
    Talavera, S.
    PLANT BIOLOGY, 2009, 11 (01) : 6 - 16
  • [23] REPRODUCTIVE-BIOLOGY AND FLORAL PHENOLOGIES OF THE SYMPATRIC SPECIES LEPTOSPERMUM-MYRSINOIDES AND L-CONTINENTALE (MYRTACEAE)
    OBRIEN, SP
    CALDER, DM
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1993, 41 (4-5) : 527 - 539
  • [24] Temporal variation of floral visitors in two sympatric co-flowering Salvia species with contrasting pollination syndromes
    Espino-Espino, Judith
    Rosas, Fernando
    Cuevas-Garcia, Eduardo
    REVISTA MEXICANA DE BIODIVERSIDAD, 2014, 85 (01) : 161 - 166
  • [25] Pollinators of Eucalyptus regnans (Myrtaceae), the world's tallest flowering plant species
    Griffin, A. Rod
    Hingston, Andrew B.
    Ohmart, Clifford P.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2009, 57 (01) : 18 - 25
  • [27] Sequential sampling in the search for new shared species
    Yue, Jack C.
    Clayton, Murray K.
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2012, 142 (05) : 1031 - 1039
  • [28] Implications of shared predation for space use in two sympatric leporids
    Weterings, Martijn J. A.
    Ewert, Sophie P.
    Peereboom, Jeffrey N.
    Kuipers, Henry J.
    Kuijper, Dries P. J.
    Prins, Herbert H. T.
    Jansen, Patrick A.
    van Langevelde, Frank
    van Wieren, Sipke E.
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 9 (06): : 3457 - 3469
  • [29] The Relationship Between Soil Environmental Factors and Flowering Phenology in Two Sympatric Southeastern Gelsemium Species-Does Habitat Specialization Determine Differences in Flowering Time?
    Pascarella, John B.
    CASTANEA, 2011, 76 (04) : 410 - 425
  • [30] A comparison of fluorescence in two sympatric scorpion species
    Kloock, Carl T.
    JOURNAL OF PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY B-BIOLOGY, 2008, 91 (2-3) : 132 - 136