A double-blind randomised study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bindarit in preventing coronary stent restenosis

被引:27
|
作者
Colombo, Antonio [1 ]
Basavarajaiah, Sandeep [1 ,2 ]
Limbruno, Ugo [3 ]
Picchi, Andrea [3 ]
Lettieri, Corrado [4 ]
Valgimigli, Marco [5 ]
Sciahbasi, Alessandro [6 ]
Prati, Francesco [7 ]
Calabresi, Marco [8 ]
Pierucci, Daniela [8 ]
Guglielmotti, Angelo [8 ]
机构
[1] Ist Sci San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
[2] Heart England NHS Trust, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Misericordia Hosp, Grosseto, Italy
[4] Carlo Poma Hosp, Mantua, Italy
[5] Univ Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
[6] Policlin Casilino, Rome, Italy
[7] San Giovanni Hosp, Rome Heart Res, OCT Cent Lab, Rome, Italy
[8] Angelini ACRAF SpA, Rome, Italy
关键词
bare metal stent; bindarit; in-stent restenosis; monocyte chemotactic protein-1; MONOCYTE CHEMOATTRACTANT PROTEIN-1; ELUTING STENTS; STENOSIS; MULTICENTER; INHIBITION; THERAPY; CELLS; RISK;
D O I
10.4244/EIJY15M12_03
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: Bindarit (BND) is a selective inhibitor of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1/CCL2), which plays an important role in generating intimal hyperplasia. Our aim was to explore the efficacy and safety of bindarit in preventing restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and results: A phase II, double-blind, multicentre randomised trial included 148 patients randomised into three arms (BND 600 mg, n=48; BND 1,200 mg, n=49; PLB, n=51). Bindarit was given following PCI and continued for 180 days. Monthly clinical follow-up and six-month coronary angiography were conducted. The primary endpoint was in-segment late loss; the main secondary endpoints were instent late loss and major adverse cardiovascular events. Efficacy analysis was carried out on two populations, ITT and PP. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics among the three treatment groups. In-segment and in-stent late loss at six months in BND 600, BND 1,200 and PLB were: (ITT 0.54 vs. 0.52 vs. 0.72; p=0.21), (PP 0.46 vs. 0.53 vs. 0.72; p=0.12) and (ITT 0.74 vs. 0.74 vs. 1.05; p=0.01), (PP 0.66 vs. 0.73 vs. 1.06; p=0.003), respectively. The MACE rates at nine months among treatment groups were 20.8% vs. 28.6% vs. 25.5% (p=0.54), respectively. Conclusions: This was a negative study with the primary endpoint not being met. However, significant reduction in the in-stent late loss suggests that bindarit probably exerts a favourable action on the vessel wall following angioplasty. Bindarit was well tolerated with a compliance rate of over 90%. A larger study utilising a loading dose and targeting a specific patient cohort may demonstrate more significant results.
引用
收藏
页码:E1385 / E1394
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Safety and efficacy of tranexamic acid in paediatric cardiac surgery: study protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial
    Zhang, Yu
    Jia, Yuan
    Shi, Jia
    Yuan, Su
    Wang, Rong
    Zhang, Zhe
    Wang, Xu
    Liu, Jinping
    Ran, Jun
    Zhao, Yuchen
    Hua, Zhongdong
    Yan, Jun
    Li, Shoujun
    Zheng, Zhe
    Hu, Shengshou
    Wang, Yang
    Yan, Fuxia
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (11):
  • [32] Efficacy and safety of solifenacin succinate in Korean patients with overactive bladder: a randomised, prospective, double-blind, multicentre study
    Choo, M. -S.
    Lee, J. Z.
    Lee, J. B.
    Kim, Y. -H.
    Jung, H. C.
    Lee, K. -S.
    Kim, J. C.
    Seo, J. T.
    Paick, J. -S.
    Kim, H. -J.
    Na, Y. G.
    Lee, J. G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2008, 62 (11) : 1675 - 1683
  • [33] The efficacy and safety of basimglurant as adjunctive therapy in major depression; a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Quiroz, J. A.
    Tamburri, P.
    Deptula, D.
    Banken, L.
    Beyer, U.
    Fontoura, P.
    Santarelli, L.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 24 : S468 - S468
  • [34] STOP!: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of methoxyflurane for the treatment of acute pain
    Coffey, Frank
    Wright, John
    Hartshorn, Stuart
    Hunt, Paul
    Locker, Thomas
    Mirza, Kazim
    Dissmann, Patrick
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2014, 31 (08) : 613 - 618
  • [35] The efficacy of sodium hypochlorite antiseptic: a double-blind, randomised controlled pilot study
    Serena, Thomas E.
    Serena, Laura
    Al-Jalodi, Omar
    Patel, Keyur
    Breisinger, Kristy
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2022, 31 (02) : S32 - S35
  • [36] Superior antidepressant efficacy of agomelatine versus sertraline: a randomised, double-blind study
    Kasper, S.
    Laigle, L.
    Bayle, F.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 18 : S336 - S337
  • [37] Is oral rapamycin useful in preventing coronary stent restenosis? A randomized study
    Sarmiento, Ricardo A.
    Cherro, Alejandro
    Szarfer, Jorge L.
    Lynch, Angeles Videla
    Solerno, Raul
    Grinfeld, Diego
    Ferrari, Pablo
    Campo, Anibal
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 98 (8A): : 198M - 198M
  • [38] Efficacy and safety of Losigamone in partial seizures: a randomized double-blind study
    Baulac, M
    Klement, S
    EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 2003, 55 (03) : 177 - 189
  • [39] Initial results of the EUROCARE trial: A European multicenter, randomised double-blind placebo controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of carvedilol after successful directional coronary atherectomy in the prevention of late restenosis.
    Serruys, PW
    Puel, J
    Hofling, B
    Simon, R
    Glogar, HD
    de Feyter, P
    Saebra-Gomes, R
    Giocolea, J
    Coste, P
    van Swijndregt, EM
    CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (17) : 513 - 513
  • [40] A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eculizumab in patients with relapsing neuromyelitis optica: the PREVENT study
    Wingerchuk, D. M.
    Palace, J.
    Cavus, I.
    O'Brien, F.
    Pittock, S. J.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2015, 21 : 759 - 759