A double-blind randomised study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bindarit in preventing coronary stent restenosis

被引:27
|
作者
Colombo, Antonio [1 ]
Basavarajaiah, Sandeep [1 ,2 ]
Limbruno, Ugo [3 ]
Picchi, Andrea [3 ]
Lettieri, Corrado [4 ]
Valgimigli, Marco [5 ]
Sciahbasi, Alessandro [6 ]
Prati, Francesco [7 ]
Calabresi, Marco [8 ]
Pierucci, Daniela [8 ]
Guglielmotti, Angelo [8 ]
机构
[1] Ist Sci San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
[2] Heart England NHS Trust, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Misericordia Hosp, Grosseto, Italy
[4] Carlo Poma Hosp, Mantua, Italy
[5] Univ Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
[6] Policlin Casilino, Rome, Italy
[7] San Giovanni Hosp, Rome Heart Res, OCT Cent Lab, Rome, Italy
[8] Angelini ACRAF SpA, Rome, Italy
关键词
bare metal stent; bindarit; in-stent restenosis; monocyte chemotactic protein-1; MONOCYTE CHEMOATTRACTANT PROTEIN-1; ELUTING STENTS; STENOSIS; MULTICENTER; INHIBITION; THERAPY; CELLS; RISK;
D O I
10.4244/EIJY15M12_03
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: Bindarit (BND) is a selective inhibitor of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1/CCL2), which plays an important role in generating intimal hyperplasia. Our aim was to explore the efficacy and safety of bindarit in preventing restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and results: A phase II, double-blind, multicentre randomised trial included 148 patients randomised into three arms (BND 600 mg, n=48; BND 1,200 mg, n=49; PLB, n=51). Bindarit was given following PCI and continued for 180 days. Monthly clinical follow-up and six-month coronary angiography were conducted. The primary endpoint was in-segment late loss; the main secondary endpoints were instent late loss and major adverse cardiovascular events. Efficacy analysis was carried out on two populations, ITT and PP. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics among the three treatment groups. In-segment and in-stent late loss at six months in BND 600, BND 1,200 and PLB were: (ITT 0.54 vs. 0.52 vs. 0.72; p=0.21), (PP 0.46 vs. 0.53 vs. 0.72; p=0.12) and (ITT 0.74 vs. 0.74 vs. 1.05; p=0.01), (PP 0.66 vs. 0.73 vs. 1.06; p=0.003), respectively. The MACE rates at nine months among treatment groups were 20.8% vs. 28.6% vs. 25.5% (p=0.54), respectively. Conclusions: This was a negative study with the primary endpoint not being met. However, significant reduction in the in-stent late loss suggests that bindarit probably exerts a favourable action on the vessel wall following angioplasty. Bindarit was well tolerated with a compliance rate of over 90%. A larger study utilising a loading dose and targeting a specific patient cohort may demonstrate more significant results.
引用
收藏
页码:E1385 / E1394
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A DOUBLE BLIND RANDOMIZED STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY OF BINDARIT IN PREVENTING CORONARY STENT RESTENOSIS
    Colombo, Antonio
    Limbruno, Ugo
    Lettieri, Corrado
    Lioy, Ernesto
    Guglielmotti, Angelo
    Calabresi, Marco
    Valgimigli, Marco
    Pierucci, Daniela
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (13) : E11 - E11
  • [2] TRAPIST study: a randomised double blind study to evaluate the efficacy of Trapidil on restenosis after successful elective coronary stenting
    Serruys, PW
    Pleper, M
    van der Bos, AA
    Foley, D
    Macaya, C
    Kiemeney, F
    Suttorp, MJ
    Rutsch, W
    Teunissen, Y
    Mignot, A
    CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (17) : 362 - 362
  • [3] Efficacy of intramuscular methyl prednisolone in preventing restenosis after coronary artery stenting with bare-metal stainless steel stent: a double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial
    Namdari, M.
    Ghafarzadeh, M.
    Nikoo, Ma
    CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA, 2011, 22 (02) : 67 - 69
  • [4] Cilostazol for restenosis trial: A randomized, double-blind study following coronary artery stent implantation
    Douglas, JS
    Holmes, DR
    Kereiakes, D
    Grines, CL
    Block, E
    Parker, K
    Foster, J
    Kolm, P
    Jurkovitz, C
    Murrah, N
    Hyde, P
    Weintraub, WS
    CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (21)
  • [5] A RANDOMISED, DOUBLE-BLIND, CONTROLLED STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF NIFURATEL IN THE TREATMENT OF TRICHOMONIASIS
    Mendling, W.
    Caserini, M.
    Palmieri, R.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2013, 89 : A38 - A38
  • [6] Randomised clinical trial: A double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Tegoprazan in patients with gastric ulcer
    Choe, YoungHee
    Cho, YuKyung
    Lim, ChulHyun
    Choi, Myung-Gyu
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2020, 32
  • [7] A randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three different doses of palonosetron versus placebo for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting
    Candiotti, Keith A.
    Kovac, Anthony L.
    Melson, Timothy I.
    Clerici, Giuseppina
    Gan, Tong Joo
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 107 (02): : 445 - 451
  • [8] Phase III, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan compared with lansoprazole in Asian patients with erosive oesophagitis
    Xiao, Yinglian
    Zhang, Shutian
    Dai, Ning
    Fei, Guijun
    Goh, Khean-Lee
    Chun, Hoon Jai
    Sheu, Bor-Shyang
    Chong, Chui Fung
    Funao, Nobuo
    Zhou, Wen
    Chen, Minhu
    GUT, 2020, 69 (02) : 224 - 230
  • [9] Safety and efficacy of vigabatrin and carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy: a multicentre randomised double-blind study
    Chadwick, D
    LANCET, 1999, 354 (9172): : 13 - 19
  • [10] A double-blind randomized dose finding study of gamma radiation for in-stent restenosis
    Teirstein, PS
    Moses, J
    Leon, M
    Collins, M
    Mehran, R
    Aymong, E
    Neogota, M
    Giap, H
    Jani, S
    Balter, S
    Dalton, J
    Lipsztein, R
    Sawhney, N
    Tripuraneni, P
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (05) : 79A - 79A