A Chinese commitment to commit: can it break the negotiation stall?

被引:8
|
作者
Bosetti, Valentina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Carraro, Carlo [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Tavoni, Massimo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Environm Inst, Princeton, NJ USA
[2] Fdn Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan, Italy
[3] Ctr Euromediterraneo Cambiamenti Climat, Lecce, Italy
[4] Univ Venice, I-30123 Venice, Italy
[5] Ctr Econ Policy & Res, Washington, DC USA
[6] CESifo, Munich, Germany
关键词
Climate Policy; BRIC Country; International Climate Policy; Climate Coalition; Future Obligation;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-009-9726-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Preparatory talks to the next round of negotiations seem to indicate that a comprehensive agreement to mitigate climate change will not be easily attainable, despite the intentions of the US administration and the high expectations surrounding the Copenhagen meeting. One key reason is to what extent fast growing economies, and especially China, should take actions to reduce their growth of emissions. This paper argues that a turning point for international negotiations on climate change could be achieved if China were to agree on carbon obligations in the future. Results from modelling work suggest that the optimal investment behaviour is to anticipate the implementation of a climate policy by roughly 10 years, and that thus future commitments-if credible-could lead to significantly earlier steps towards carbon mitigation. If fast growing economies, and foremost China, believe in the long term objective of global stabilization of carbon concentrations, it might be economically rationale to sign on future targets, provided developed countries take on immediate action. Such a provision could be beneficial for both the developing and developed world.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 303
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Failing to commit: Maximizers avoid commitment in a way that contributes to reduced satisfaction
    Sparks, Erin A.
    Ehrlinger, Joyce
    Eibach, Richard P.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2012, 52 (01) : 72 - 77
  • [22] Can't commit? Look to your genes
    Shetty, Priya
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2008, 199 (2672) : 16 - 16
  • [23] How Fast can a Distributed Transaction Commit?
    Guerraoui, Rachid
    Wang, Jingjing
    PODS'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 36TH ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI SYMPOSIUM ON PRINCIPLES OF DATABASE SYSTEMS, 2017, : 107 - 122
  • [24] LITERARY CHARACTERS WHO CAN'T COMMIT
    Fitzgerald, Ali
    NEW YORK TIMES BOOK REVIEW, 2019, 124 (03): : 23 - 23
  • [25] Can We Commit Future Managers to Honesty?
    Jacquemet, Nicolas
    Luchini, Stephane
    Rosaz, Julie
    Shogren, Jason F.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [26] Can't quite commit: Rumination and uncertainty
    Ward, A
    Lyubomirsky, S
    Sousa, L
    Nolen-Hoeksema, S
    PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2003, 29 (01) : 96 - 107
  • [27] Negotiation of meaning and negotiation of form in Chinese EFL classroom discourse
    Wang, Qing
    IRAL-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING, 2020, 58 (02): : 239 - 262
  • [28] CAN SOFTWARE BREAK
    BARDEN, W
    POPULAR COMPUTING, 1983, 2 (05): : 52 - &
  • [29] Correction to: Power-sharing negotiation and commitment in monarchies
    Kana Inata
    Public Choice, 2022, 192 : 189 - 191
  • [30] Commitment to the Chinese market
    不详
    ZKG INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 63 (7-8): : 10 - 10