Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS): A Novel, Efficient and Cost-Effective Genotyping Method for Cattle Using Next-Generation Sequencing

被引:149
|
作者
De Donato, Marcos [1 ,2 ]
Peters, Sunday O. [1 ,3 ]
Mitchell, Sharon E. [4 ]
Hussain, Tanveer [1 ,5 ]
Imumorin, Ikhide G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Univ Oriente, Lab Genet Mol, Inst Invest Biomed & Ciencias Aplicadas, Cumana, Venezuela
[3] Berry Coll, Dept Anim Sci, Mt Berry, GA USA
[4] Cornell Univ, Inst Genom Div, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[5] Univ Vet & Anim Sci, Inst Biochem & Biotechnol, Lahore, Pakistan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 05期
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
GENOME; DISCOVERY; SELECTION; MARKERS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0062137
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
High-throughput genotyping methods have increased the analytical power to study complex traits but high cost has remained a barrier for large scale use in animal improvement. We have adapted genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) used in plants for genotyping 47 animals representing 7 taurine and indicine breeds of cattle from the US and Africa. Genomic DNA was digested with different enzymes, ligated to adapters containing one of 48 unique bar codes and sequenced by the Illumina HiSeq 2000. PstI was the best enzyme producing 1.4 million unique reads per animal and initially identifying a total of 63,697 SNPs. After removal of SNPs with call rates of less than 70%, 51,414 SNPs were detected throughout all autosomes with an average distance of 48.1 kb, and 1,143 SNPs on the X chromosome at an average distance of 130.3 kb, as well as 191 on unmapped contigs. If we consider only the SNPs with call rates of 90% and over, we identified 39,751 on autosomes, 850 on the X chromosome and 124 on unmapped contigs. Of these SNPs, 28,843 were not tightly linked to other SNPs. Average marker density per autosome was highly correlated with chromosome size (coefficient of correlation = -0.798, r(2) = 0.637) with higher density in smaller chromosomes. Average SNP call rate was 86.5% for all loci, with 53.0% of the loci having call rates >90% and the average minor allele frequency being 0.212. Average observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.046-0.294 among individuals, and from 0.064-0.197 among breeds, with Brangus showing the highest diversity as expected. GBS technique is novel, flexible, sufficiently high-throughput, and capable of providing acceptable marker density for genomic selection or genome-wide association studies at roughly one third of the cost of currently available genotyping technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Next-generation sequencing is a credible strategy for blood group genotyping
    Fichou, Yann
    Audrezet, Marie-Pierre
    Gueguen, Paul
    Le Marechal, Cedric
    Ferec, Claude
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2014, 167 (04) : 554 - 562
  • [42] A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data
    Mark A DePristo
    Eric Banks
    Ryan Poplin
    Kiran V Garimella
    Jared R Maguire
    Christopher Hartl
    Anthony A Philippakis
    Guillermo del Angel
    Manuel A Rivas
    Matt Hanna
    Aaron McKenna
    Tim J Fennell
    Andrew M Kernytsky
    Andrey Y Sivachenko
    Kristian Cibulskis
    Stacey B Gabriel
    David Altshuler
    Mark J Daly
    [J]. Nature Genetics, 2011, 43 : 491 - 498
  • [43] A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data
    DePristo, Mark A.
    Banks, Eric
    Poplin, Ryan
    Garimella, Kiran V.
    Maguire, Jared R.
    Hartl, Christopher
    Philippakis, Anthony A.
    del Angel, Guillermo
    Rivas, Manuel A.
    Hanna, Matt
    McKenna, Aaron
    Fennell, Tim J.
    Kernytsky, Andrew M.
    Sivachenko, Andrey Y.
    Cibulskis, Kristian
    Gabriel, Stacey B.
    Altshuler, David
    Daly, Mark J.
    [J]. NATURE GENETICS, 2011, 43 (05) : 491 - +
  • [44] High-Throughput Blood Donor Genotyping Using Next-Generation Sequencing
    Nygren, Anders
    Ochsenfeld, John J.
    Tressler, Rob
    Harris, Crane
    Bixenman, Helen
    Spinosa, John
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2019, 59 : 116A - 117A
  • [45] A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species
    Elshire, Robert J.
    Glaubitz, Jeffrey C.
    Sun, Qi
    Poland, Jesse A.
    Kawamoto, Ken
    Buckler, Edward S.
    Mitchell, Sharon E.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (05):
  • [46] Next generation sequencing as an efficient and cost-effective method of HIV drug resistance surveillance
    Ji, H.
    Masse, N.
    Tyler, S.
    Liang, B.
    Li, Y.
    Merks, H.
    Graham, M.
    Sandstrom, P.
    Brooks, J.
    [J]. ANTIVIRAL THERAPY, 2009, 14 (04) : A124 - A124
  • [47] Phylogenomic investigation of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) and related species using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS)
    Somayeh Sardouei-Nasab
    Zahra Nemati
    Ghasem Mohammadi-Nejad
    Reza Haghi
    Frank R. Blattner
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 13
  • [48] Phylogenomic investigation of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) and related species using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS)
    Sardouei-Nasab, Somayeh
    Nemati, Zahra
    Mohammadi-Nejad, Ghasem
    Haghi, Reza
    Blattner, Frank R.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [49] Marker Density and Read Depth for Genotyping Populations Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing
    Beissinger, Timothy M.
    Hirsch, Candice N.
    Sekhon, Rajandeep S.
    Foerster, Jillian M.
    Johnson, James M.
    Muttoni, German
    Vaillancourt, Brieanne
    Buell, C. Robin
    Kaeppler, Shawn M.
    de Leon, Natalia
    [J]. GENETICS, 2013, 193 (04) : 1073 - 1081
  • [50] Using genotyping-by-sequencing to predict gender in animals
    Bilton, T. P.
    Chappell, A. J.
    Clarke, S. M.
    Brauning, R.
    Dodds, K. G.
    McEwan, J. C.
    Rowe, S. J.
    [J]. ANIMAL GENETICS, 2019, 50 (03) : 307 - 310