Tumor Bed Dynamics After Surgical Resection of Brain Metastases: Implications for Postoperative Radiosurgery

被引:81
|
作者
Jarvis, Lesley A. [1 ]
Simmons, Nathan E. [2 ]
Bellerive, Marc
Erkmen, Kadir [2 ]
Eskey, Clifford J. [3 ]
Gladstone, David J.
Hug, Eugen B. [4 ]
Roberts, David W. [2 ]
Hartford, Alan C.
机构
[1] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Norris Cotton Canc Ctr, Sect Radiat Oncol, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[2] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Neurosurg Sect, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[3] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[4] Procure, New York, NY USA
关键词
Brain metastasis; Radiotherapy; Radiosurgery; Resection cavity; STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY; RADIATION-THERAPY; MANAGEMENT; CAVITY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.067
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To analyze 2 factors that influence timing of radiosurgery after surgical resection of brain metastases: target volume dynamics and intracranial tumor progression in the interval between surgery and cavity stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Methods and Materials: Three diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were retrospectively analyzed for 41 patients with a total of 43 resected brain metastases: preoperative MRI scan (MRI-1), MRI scan within 24 hours after surgery (MRI-2), and MRI scan for radiosurgery planning, which is generally performed <= 1 week before SRS (MRI-3). Tumors were contoured on MRI-1 scans, and resection cavities were contoured on MRI-2 and MRI-3 scans. Results: The mean tumor volume before surgery was 14.23 cm(3), and the mean cavity volume was 8.53 cm(3) immediately after surgery and 8.77 cm(3) before SRS. In the interval between surgery and SRS, 20 cavities (46.5%) were stable in size, defined as a change of <= 2 cm(3); 10 cavities (23.3%) collapsed by >2 cm(3); and 13 cavities (30.2%) increased by >2 cm(3). The unexpected increase in cavity size was a result of local progression (2 cavities), accumulation of cyst-like fluid or blood (9 cavities), and nonspecific postsurgical changes (2 cavities). Finally, in the interval between surgery and SRS, 5 cavities showed definite local tumor progression, 4 patients had progression elsewhere in the brain, 1 patient had both local progression and progression elsewhere, and 33 patients had stable intracranial disease. Conclusions: In the interval between surgical resection and delivery of SRS, surgical cavities are dynamic in size; however, most cavities do not collapse, and nearly one-third are larger at the time of SRS. These observations support obtaining imaging for radiosurgery planning as close to SRS delivery as possible and suggest that delaying SRS after surgery does not offer the benefit of cavity collapse in most patients. A prospective, multi-institutional trial will provide more guidance to the optimal timing of cavity SRS. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:943 / 948
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcome Evaluation of Oligometastatic Patients Treated with Surgical Resection Followed by Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery (HSRS) on the Tumor Bed, for Single, Large Brain Metastases
    Pessina, Federico
    Navarria, Pierina
    Cozzi, Luca
    Ascolese, Anna Maria
    Maggi, Giulia
    Riva, Marco
    Masci, Giovanna
    D'Agostino, Giuseppe
    Finocchiaro, Giovanna
    Santoro, Armando
    Bello, Lorenzo
    Scorsetti, Marta
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (06):
  • [32] A comparison of surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of solitary brain metastases
    O'Neill, BP
    Iturria, NJ
    Link, MJ
    Pollock, BE
    Ballman, KV
    O'Fallon, JR
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 55 (05): : 1169 - 1176
  • [33] EVALUATION OF RECURRENCE PATTERNS AFTER POSTOPERATIVE RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES
    Visani, Luca
    Bertini, Niccolo
    Desideri, Isacco
    Greto, Daniela
    Simontacchi, Gabriele
    Francolini, Giulio
    Di Cataldo, Vanessa
    Garlatti, Pietro
    Peruzzi, Anna
    Orsatti, Carolina
    Mattioli, Chiara
    Frosini, Giulio
    Burchini, Luca
    Caprara, Luisa
    Carnevale, Maria Grazia
    Meattini, Icro
    Livi, Lorenzo
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S859 - S861
  • [34] Cavity Volume Dynamics After Resection of Brain Metastases and Timing of Postresection Cavity Stereotactic Radiosurgery
    Atalar, Banu
    Choi, Clara Y. H.
    Harsh, Griffith R.
    Chang, Steven D.
    Gibbs, Iris C.
    Adler, John R.
    Soltys, Scott G.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 72 (02) : 180 - 185
  • [35] Radiosurgery to the Postoperative Tumor Bed for Metastatic Carcinoma Versus Whole Brain Radiation After Surgery
    Scheitler-Ring, Kristen
    Ge, Bin
    Petroski, Greg
    Biedermann, Gregory
    Litofsky, N. Scott
    CUREUS, 2016, 8 (11):
  • [36] Indications for resection and radiosurgery for brain metastases
    Martin, JJ
    Kondziolka, D
    CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2005, 17 (06) : 584 - 587
  • [37] Solitary brain metastases - Resection or radiosurgery
    Kocher, M.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2006, 182 : 151 - 151
  • [38] ADJUVANT STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY INCREASES TUMOR CONTROL RATES IN PATIENTS WITH CEREBRAL METASTASES AFTER SURGICAL RESECTION
    Jackson, Christopher M.
    Amin, Anubav
    See, Pokmeng
    Pradilla, Gustavo
    Tryggestad, Eric
    Lim, Michael
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2010, 12 : 112 - 112
  • [39] Outcomes of postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery to the resection cavity versus stereotactic radiosurgery alone for melanoma brain metastases
    Minniti, Giuseppe
    Paolini, Sergio
    D'Andrea, Giancarlo
    Lanzetta, Gaetano
    Cicone, Francesco
    Confaloni, Veronica
    Bozzao, Alessandro
    Esposito, Vincenzo
    Osti, Mattia
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 132 (03) : 455 - 462
  • [40] Outcomes of postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery to the resection cavity versus stereotactic radiosurgery alone for melanoma brain metastases
    Giuseppe Minniti
    Sergio Paolini
    Giancarlo D’Andrea
    Gaetano Lanzetta
    Francesco Cicone
    Veronica Confaloni
    Alessandro Bozzao
    Vincenzo Esposito
    Mattia Osti
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2017, 132 : 455 - 462