Faculty Development for the Operating Room An Examination of the Effectiveness of an Intraoperative Teaching Course for Surgeons

被引:14
|
作者
Gardner, Aimee K. [1 ]
Timberlake, Matthew D. [2 ]
Dunkin, Brian J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Surg, Sch Allied Hlth Sci, MS BCM115,DeBakey Bldg,M108K,One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Urol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[3] Houston Methodist Hosp, Dept Surg, Houston, TX USA
关键词
debriefing; faculty development; intraoperative teaching; operating room teaching; teaching; EDUCATION; PROGRAM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000002468
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: We describe a half-day faculty development course designed to equip surgical educators with evidence-based teaching frameworks shown to promote learning in the operating room (OR). We hypothesize that participating faculty will deliver improved instruction as perceived by residents. Methods: Residents anonymously rated faculty teaching behaviors among whom they had recently worked in the OR (minimum 3 cases in preceding 6 months) using the Briefing - Intraoperative teaching - Debriefing Assessment Tool (BIDAT; 1 = never, 5 = always). Faculty then attended a half-day course. The curriculum was based on the "briefing-intraoperative teaching-debriefing" framework. Discussion and practice centered on goal setting, performance-enhancing instruction, dual task interference, and feedback. After the course, residents again evaluated the faculty. Paired-samples and independent-samples t tests were used to analyze pre and post course changes and differences between groups, respectively. Results: Nineteen faculty completed the course. Associate professors (N = 4) demonstrated improved briefing (4.32 +/- 0.48 -> 4.76 +/- 0.45, P < 0.01), debriefing (4.30 +/- 0.29 -> 4.77 +/- 0.43, P < 0.01), and total teaching (4.38 +/- 0.78 -> 4.79 +/- 0.39, P < 0.05). No significant changes were observed among assistant (N = 9) or full professors (N = 6). All 3 faculty members who served as course co-instructors, regardless of rank, improved significantly in briefing (4.42 +/- 0.22 -> 4.98 +/- 0.29, P < 0.05), debriefing (4.27 +/- 0.23 -> 4.98 +/- 0.29, P < 0.04), and total teaching (4.37 +/- 0.21 -> 4.99 +/- 0.02, P < 0.05). Faculty with baseline teaching scores in the bottom quartile improved teaching behaviors in all phases of instruction (P < 0.05). Teaching scores over the same period did not change among faculty who did not attend. Conclusions: A half-day course aimed at enhancing intraoperative instruction can contribute to resident-perceived improvement in structured teaching behavior among participating faculty. Initiatives directed at intraoperative instruction might be best targeted towards midlevel faculty with established technical expertise who are motivated to expand teaching efforts and those who have low levels of baseline teaching scores.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 190
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Faculty Development for the Operating Room: An Examination of the Effectiveness of an Intraoperative Teaching Course for Surgeons
    Gardner, Aimee K.
    Timberlake, Matthew D.
    Dunkin, Brian J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2017, 225 (04) : E43 - E43
  • [2] The Briefing, Intraoperative Teaching, Debriefing Model for Teaching in the Operating Room
    Roberts, Nicole K.
    Williams, Reed G.
    Kim, Michael J.
    Dunnington, Gary L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 208 (02) : 299 - 303
  • [3] The reliability of an instrument for identifying and quantifying surgeons' teaching in the operating room
    Hauge, LS
    Wanzek, JA
    Godellas, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 181 (04): : 333 - 337
  • [4] Teaching operating room conflict management to surgeons: clarifying the optimal approach
    Rogers, David
    Lingard, Lorelei
    Boehler, Margaret L.
    Espin, Sherry
    Klingensmith, Mary
    Mellinger, John D.
    Schindler, Nancy
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2011, 45 (09) : 939 - 945
  • [5] Does faculty development enhance teaching effectiveness?
    Hendricson, William D.
    Anderson, Eugene
    Andrieu, Sandra C.
    Chadwick, D. Gregory
    Cole, James R.
    George, Mary C.
    Glickman, Gerald N.
    Glover, Joel F.
    Goldberg, Jerold S.
    Haden, N. Karl
    Kalkwarf, Kenneth L.
    Meyerowitz, Cyril
    Neumann, Laura M.
    Pyle, Marsha
    Tedesco, Lisa A.
    Valachovic, Richard W.
    Weaver, Richard G.
    Winder, Ronald L.
    Young, Stephen K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2007, 71 (12) : 1513 - 1533
  • [6] Observation of Clinical Teaching: Interest in a Faculty Development Program for Surgeons
    Peyre, Sarah E.
    Frankl, Susan E.
    Thorndike, Mary
    Breen, Elizabeth M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2011, 68 (05) : 372 - 376
  • [7] Faculty development in geriatrics teaching for surgeons and sub-specialists
    Williams, BC
    Fitzgerald, JT
    Halter, JB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 19 : 88 - 88
  • [8] Factors Influencing Surgeons' Intraoperative Leadership: Video Analysis of Unanticipated Events in the Operating Room
    Parker, Sarah Henrickson
    Flin, Rhona
    McKinley, Aileen
    Yule, Steven
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 38 (01) : 4 - 10
  • [9] Factors Influencing Surgeons’ Intraoperative Leadership: Video Analysis of Unanticipated Events in the Operating Room
    Sarah Henrickson Parker
    Rhona Flin
    Aileen McKinley
    Steven Yule
    [J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2014, 38 : 4 - 10
  • [10] Framework for Faculty Development in Resident Autonomy and Entrustment in the Operating Room
    Chen, Xiaodong
    Cochran, Amalia
    Dalrymple, John L.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2019, 154 (01) : 5 - 6