Timing of norepinephrine initiation in patients with septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:61
|
作者
Li, Yuting [1 ]
Li, Hongxiang [1 ]
Zhang, Dong [1 ]
机构
[1] First Hosp Jilin Univ, Dept Intens Care Unit, Changchun 130021, Jilin, Peoples R China
关键词
Timing; Norepinephrine initiation; Septic shock; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; CAMPAIGN INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES; SEPSIS; FLUID; VASOPRESSIN; RESUSCITATION; MANAGEMENT; PRESSURE; SURVIVAL; DEATH;
D O I
10.1186/s13054-020-03204-x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background The effect of the timing of norepinephrine initiation on clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock is uncertain. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of early and late start of norepinephrine support on clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock. Methods We searched the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies from inception to the 1st of March 2020. We included studies involving adult patients (> 18 years) with septic shock. All authors reported our primary outcome of short-term mortality and clearly comparing early versus late norepinephrine initiation with clinically relevant secondary outcomes (ICU length of stay, time to achieved target mean arterial pressure (>= 65 mmHg), and volume of intravenous fluids within 6 h). Results were expressed as odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with accompanying 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Five studies including 929 patients were included. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis showed that the short-term mortality of the early group was lower than that of the late group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.61;P < 0.00001;chi(2) = 3.74;I-2 = 0%). Secondary outcomes demonstrated that the time to achieved target MAP of the early group was shorter than that of the late group (mean difference = - 1.39; 95% CI, - 1.81 to - 0.96;P < 0.00001;chi(2) = 1.03;I-2 = 0%). The volume of intravenous fluids within 6 h of the early group was less than that of the late group (mean difference = - 0.50; 95% CI, - 0.68 to - 0.32;P < 0.00001;chi(2) = 33.76;I-2 = 94%). There was no statistically significant difference in the ICU length of stay between the two groups (mean difference = - 0.11; 95% CI, - 1.27 to 1.05;P = 0.86;chi(2) = 0.85;I-2 = 0%). Conclusions Early initiation of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock was associated with decreased short-term mortality, shorter time to achieved target MAP, and less volume of intravenous fluids within 6 h. There was no significant difference in ICU length of stay between early and late groups. Further large-scale RCTs are still required to confirm these results.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Effect of midodrine on the prognosis of patients with septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    He, Q. -F.
    Xing, X. -K.
    Wang, T. -Q.
    Jiang, Z. -X.
    Zhang, G.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 27 (09) : 4211 - 4220
  • [12] Application of norepinephrine in the treatment of septic shock: a meta-analysis
    Xu, Qiu Ying
    Jin, Yan Hong
    Fu, Li
    Li, Ying Ying
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2025, 194 (01) : 361 - 369
  • [13] Dopamine versus norepinephrine in septic shock: a meta-analysis
    S Shenoy
    A Ganesh
    A Rishi
    V Doshi
    S Lankala
    J Molnar
    S Kogilwaimath
    Critical Care, 15 (Suppl 1):
  • [14] Vasopressors for the Treatment of Septic Shock: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Avni, Tomer
    Lador, Adi
    Lev, Shaul
    Leibovici, Leonard
    Paul, Mical
    Grossman, Alon
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [15] Hydrocortisone with fludrocortisone for septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yamamoto, Ryo
    Nahara, Isao
    Toyosaki, Mitsunobu
    Fukuda, Tatsuma
    Masuda, Yoshiki
    Fujishima, Seitaro
    ACUTE MEDICINE & SURGERY, 2020, 7 (01):
  • [16] Methylene Blue in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fernando, Shannon M.
    Tran, Alexandre
    Soliman, Karim
    Flynn, Barbara
    Oommen, Thomas
    Wenzhe, Li
    Adhikari, Neill K. J.
    Kanji, Salmaan
    Seely, Andrew J. E.
    Fox-Robichaud, Alison E.
    Wax, Randy S.
    Cook, Deborah J.
    Lamontagne, Francois
    Rochwerg, Bram
    CRITICAL CARE EXPLORATIONS, 2024, 6 (07) : e1110
  • [17] Corticosteroids in septic shock: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Ben Gibbison
    José A. López-López
    Julian P. T. Higgins
    Tom Miller
    Gianni D. Angelini
    Stafford L. Lightman
    Djillali Annane
    Critical Care, 21
  • [18] Vasopressors in septic shock: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Zhou, Feihu
    Mao, Zhi
    Zeng, Xiantao
    Kang, Hongjun
    Liu, Hui
    Pan, Liang
    Hou, Peter C.
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2015, 11 : 1047 - 1059
  • [19] Corticosteroids in septic shock: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Gibbison, Ben
    Lopez-Lopez, Jose A.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Miller, Tom
    Angelini, Gianni D.
    Lightman, Stafford L.
    Annane, Djillali
    CRITICAL CARE, 2017, 21
  • [20] Clinical trials comparing norepinephrine with vasopressin in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis
    Fei-Hu Zhou
    Qing Song
    Military Medical Research, 1 (1)