The Practice of Pre-Marketing Safety Assessment in Drug Development

被引:12
|
作者
Chuang-Stein, Christy [1 ]
Xia, H. Amy [2 ]
机构
[1] Pfizer Inc, Stat Res & Consulting Ctr, Kalamazoo, MI USA
[2] Amgen Inc, Global Biostat Sci, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
关键词
Designated medical events; Graphical display of safety data; Multiplicity adjustment; Program safety analysis plan; Targeted medical event; Three-tier approach; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.1080/10543406.2013.736805
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The last 15 years have seen a substantial increase in efforts devoted to safety assessment by statisticians in the pharmaceutical industry. While some of these efforts were driven by regulations and public demand for safer products, much of the motivation came from the realization that there is a strong need for a systematic approach to safety planning, evaluation, and reporting at the program level throughout the drug development life cycle. An efficient process can help us identify safety signals early and afford us the opportunity to develop effective risk minimization plan early in the development cycle. This awareness has led many pharmaceutical sponsors to set up internal systems and structures to effectively conduct safety assessment at all levels (patient, study, and program). In addition to process, tools have emerged that are designed to enhance data review and pattern recognition. In this paper, we describe advancements in the practice of safety assessment during the premarketing phase of drug development. In particular, we share examples of safety assessment practice at our respective companies, some of which are based on recommendations from industry-initiated working groups on best practice in recent years.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 25
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Drug metabolism and metabolite safety assessment in drug discovery and development
    He, Chunyong
    Wan, Hong
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 14 (10) : 1071 - 1085
  • [32] Metabolomics in the early assessment of drug safety and pharmaceutical development
    Robertson, Donald G.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 246
  • [33] Kidney Safety Assessment: Current Practices in Drug Development
    Troth, Sean P.
    Simutis, Frank
    Friedman, Gary S.
    Todd, Susan
    Sistare, Frank D.
    SEMINARS IN NEPHROLOGY, 2019, 39 (02) : 120 - 131
  • [34] Predictive chemogenomics for safety assessment in drug discovery and development
    Gee, P
    DRUG METABOLISM REVIEWS, 2004, 36 : 10 - 10
  • [35] Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines: Analysis of Pre-Marketing Clinical Trials for Immunogenicity in the Population over 50 Years of Age
    Papazisis, Georgios
    Topalidou, Xanthippi
    Gioula, Georgia
    Gonzalez, Pablo A.
    Bueno, Susan M.
    Kalergis, Alexis M.
    VACCINES, 2024, 12 (04)
  • [36] The use of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data in the assessment of drug safety in early drug development
    Walker, DK
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 58 (06) : 601 - 608
  • [37] COMPARATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR PRE-MARKETING PREMANUFACTURE NOTIFICATIONS IN THE EC COUNTRIES AND THE USA, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO RISK ASSESSMENT IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE US TOXIC-SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT (TSCA)
    ARCOS, JC
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF TOXICOLOGY, 1983, 2 (01): : 131 - 145
  • [38] CLINICAL DATA GAP BETWEEN PHASE III CLINICAL TRIALS (PRE-MARKETING) AND PHASE IV (POST-MARKETING) STUDIES: EVALUATION OF ETANERCEPT IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
    Farahani, Pendar
    Levine, Mitchell
    Gaebel, Kathryn
    Thabane, Lehana
    JOURNAL OF POPULATION THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 12 (03): : E254 - E263
  • [39] Applications of Genetically Modified Tools to Safety Assessment in Drug Development
    Hee Yeon Kay
    Hongmin Wu
    Seo In Lee
    Sang Geon Kim
    Toxicological Research, 2010, 26 (1) : 1 - 8
  • [40] Orphan drug development: issues relating to efficacy and safety assessment
    Voordouw, Bettie C. G.
    Gispen-de Wied, Christine C.
    van Zwieten, Barbara J.
    EJHP PRACTICE, 2010, 16 (06): : 44 - 45