Three-year clinical follow-up after Palmaz-Schatz stenting

被引:62
|
作者
Klugherz, BD [1 ]
DeAngelo, DL [1 ]
Kim, BK [1 ]
Herrmann, HC [1 ]
Hirshfeld, JW [1 ]
Kolansky, DM [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV PENN,MED CTR,DIV CARDIOVASC,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19104
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0735-1097(95)00574-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. Our goals were to examine late clinical outcome in a cohort of patients who electively received Palmaz-Schatz intracoronary stents, to identify specific predictors of outcome and to determine the time course of the development of ischemic cardiac events after stenting. Background. Short-term results of Palmaz-Schatz intracoronary stenting have been promising, with a reduction in both angiographic restenosis and clinical cardiac events up to 1 year after stenting. Methods. We analyzed the clinical outcomes in 65 consecutive patients who underwent stenting at least 3 years before analysis, Demographic, clinical and procedural predictors of survival and event free survival, defined as freedom from myocardial infarction, stent-site percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass graft surgery or death, were analyzed at a mean follow-up of 39 +/- 17 months. Results. Absolute survival and event-free survival at 3 years were 88% and 56%, respectively. Three-year freedom from stent-site revascularization was 66%. Predictors of decreased long-term survival (p < 0.05) included diabetes and a high angina score (Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III/IV) at 6 and 12 months after stenting. Predictors of decreased event-free survival (p < 0.05) included a high angina score at 3, 6 and 12 months after stenting, smaller stent deployment balloon size and greater number of stents implanted. Freedom from adverse events by 6 months after stenting also correlated with long-term event free survival. Eighty five percent of stent-site revascularizations occurred within 1 year. During late follow-up (>24 months), no patients had stent-site stenoses requiring revascularization, whereas 11% of patients required revascularization in nonstented coronary segments. Conclusions. Clinical predictors of worse long-term. outcome included diabetes mellitus, higher angina score at follow-up, smaller stent deployment balloon size and greater number of stents at implantation. During follow-up, the majority of adverse events and stent-site revascularizations occurred early after stenting, and disease progression in nonstented vessels accounted for the majority of late revascularization events.
引用
收藏
页码:1185 / 1191
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] STENTING WITH THE HALF (DISARTICULATED) PALMAZ-SCHATZ STENT
    MEHAN, VK
    KAUFMANN, U
    URBAN, P
    CHATELAIN, P
    MEIER, B
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1995, 34 (02): : 122 - 127
  • [12] FOLLOW-UP PATENCY OF SIDE BRANCHES COVERED BY AN INTRACORONARY PALMAZ-SCHATZ STENT
    PAN, M
    MEDINA, A
    HERNANDEZ, E
    DELEZO, JS
    ROMERO, M
    MELIAN, F
    PAVLOVIC, D
    CABRERA, JA
    MARRERO, J
    ORTEGA, JR
    SEGURA, J
    CIRCULATION, 1993, 88 (04) : 640 - 640
  • [13] 3 YEARS QUANTITATIVE ANGIOGRAPHIC FOLLOW-UP AFTER PALMAZ-SCHATZ CORONARY STENT IMPLANTATION
    KIMURA, T
    YOKOI, H
    NAKAGAWA, Y
    TAMURA, T
    NOSAKA, H
    NOBUYOSHI, M
    CIRCULATION, 1994, 90 (04) : 323 - 323
  • [14] Coronary stenting with the half (disarticulated) Palmaz-Schatz stent: Immediate results and six-month follow-up
    Marzochi, A
    Piovaccari, G
    Marrozzini, C
    Ortolani, P
    Palmerini, T
    Branzi, A
    Magnani, B
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1997, 41 (04): : 371 - 376
  • [15] FOLLOW-UP PATENCY OF SIDE BRANCHES COVERED BY INTRACORONARY PALMAZ-SCHATZ STENT
    PAN, M
    MEDINA, A
    DELEZO, JS
    ROMERO, M
    MELIAN, F
    PAVLOVIC, D
    HERNANDEZ, E
    SEGURA, J
    MARRERO, J
    TORRES, F
    GIMENEZ, D
    ORTEGA, JR
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1995, 129 (03) : 436 - 440
  • [16] PALMAZ-SCHATZ STENT IMPLANTATION IN STENOSED SAPHENOUS-VEIN GRAFTS - CLINICAL AND ANGIOGRAPHIC FOLLOW-UP
    STRUMPF, RK
    MEHTA, SS
    PONDER, R
    HEUSER, RR
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1992, 123 (05) : 1329 - 1336
  • [17] Impact of cilostazol, a novel antiplatelet agent, on follow-up angiography after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation
    Ochiai, M
    Isshiki, T
    Takeshita, S
    Eto, K
    Mitani, H
    Yokoyama, N
    Toyoizumi, H
    Sato, T
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 80 : TCT84 - TCT84
  • [18] INTRACORONARY PALMAZ-SCHATZ STENT PLACEMENT AFTER COMPLICATED ANGIOPLASTY - MEDIUM-TERM FOLLOW-UP
    FOUSSAS, S
    MANGINAS, A
    FAKIOLAS, C
    OLYMPIOS, C
    KAFANTOGIAS, A
    ALEXOPOULOS, D
    VOUDRIS, V
    COKKINOS, DV
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 1994, 49 (03) : 241 - 249
  • [19] SERIAL ANGIOGRAPHIC FOLLOW-UP AFTER PALMAZ-SCHATZ STENT IMPLANTATION - COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY
    KIMURA, T
    NOSAKA, H
    YOKOI, H
    IWABUCHI, M
    NOBUYOSHI, M
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 21 (07) : 1557 - 1563
  • [20] Superimposed stents in the management of acute recoil after Palmaz-Schatz stenting
    Lederman, RJ
    Moscucci, M
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1998, 44 (04): : 407 - 410