Optimal Elbow Angle for Sonographic Visualization of the Ulnar Collateral Ligament

被引:5
|
作者
Lueders, Daniel R. [1 ]
Pourcho, Adam M. [2 ]
Sellon, Jacob L. [1 ]
Dahm, Diane L. [3 ]
Smith, Jay [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Swedish Med Grp, Swedish Spine Sports & Musculoskeletal Med, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Dept Anat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
DYNAMIC SONOGRAPHY; BASEBALL PITCHERS; ULTRASONOGRAPHIC EVALUATION; VALGUS INSTABILITY; ANATOMY; INJURY; PLAYERS; NERVE; US; ULTRASOUND;
D O I
10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.03.015
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To formally examine the sonographic appearance of the elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) at 30 degrees versus 70 degrees of elbow flexion in asymptomatic baseball pitchers. Design: A prospective, cross-sectional design. Setting: Sports medicine clinic in a tertiary academic medical center. Participants: Thirty asymptomatic adolescent baseball pitchers 13-18 years of age (mean 15.8 years), with at least 3 years of continuous pitching experience and no significant history of elbow pain or injury. Methods: Static sonographic images of the bilateral UCLs were obtained at 30 degrees and 70 degrees of elbow flexion by a single experienced examiner. Images were anonymized and randomized into a slide set. Three clinicians with different levels of ultrasound experience reviewed the static 30 degrees and 70 degrees images for each elbow and chose their preferred image based on UCL conspicuity. The clinicians reviewed a re-randomized slide set 1 week later. A different study co-investigator measured UCL cross-sectional area (CSA) on all images using ultrasound machine electronic calipers. Main Outcome Measures: Preference for the sonographic conspicuity of the UCL at 30 degrees versus 70 degrees of elbow flexion, and UCL CSA at 30 degrees versus 70 degrees of flexion. Results: Each clinician demonstrated a significant preference for UCL images obtained at 70 degrees of flexion when compared to those obtained at 30 degrees (80.3% overall preference for 70 degrees, P < .001). There was no statistically significant effect of clinician experience or arm dominance on image preference. The sonographically determined CSA of the UCLs were on average 1.4 mm(2) greater at 70 degrees than at 30 degrees of flexion (P < .001) when combining dominant and nondominant arms. Conclusions: Static sonographic evaluation of the UCL at 70 degrees of elbow flexion should be integrated into UCL imaging protocols. Furthermore, when performing sonographically guided procedures targeting the UCL, clinicians should consider positioning the elbow at >30 degrees of flexion to optimize UCL conspicuity and CSA.
引用
收藏
页码:970 / 977
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] TRENDS IN ULNAR COLLATERAL LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION AND ASSOCIATED ELBOW SURGERY
    Rosenblum, S.
    Yeranosian, M.
    Terrell, R.
    McAllister, D.
    Petrigliano, F.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 62 (01) : 243 - 243
  • [22] Impact of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tear on Posteromedial Elbow Biomechanics
    Anand, Prashanth
    Parks, Brent G.
    Hassan, Sheref E.
    Osbahr, Daryl C.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 38 (07) : E547 - E551
  • [23] Ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the elbow in professional football quarterbacks
    Dodson, Christopher C.
    Slenker, Nicholas
    Cohen, Steven B.
    Ciccotti, Michael G.
    DeLuca, Peter
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2010, 19 (08) : 1276 - 1280
  • [24] Evolution of the treatment options of ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the elbow
    Langer, P
    Fadale, P
    Hulstyn, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 40 (06) : 499 - 506
  • [25] Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow With Double Suspensory Fixation
    Mirzayan, Raffy
    Schoell, Kyle
    Acevedo, Daniel C.
    Singh, Anshuman
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2021, 10 (02): : e303 - e309
  • [26] Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Erickson, Brandon J.
    Chalmers, Peter N.
    Bush-Joseph, Charles A.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 3 (12)
  • [27] Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair of the Elbow—Biomechanics, Indications, and Outcomes
    Stephen J. Torres
    Orr Limpisvasti
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2021, 14 : 168 - 173
  • [28] Rehabilitation Variability After Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction
    Lightsey, Harry M.
    Trofa, David P.
    Sonnenfeld, Julian J.
    Swindell, Hasani W.
    Makhni, Eric C.
    Ahmad, Christopher S.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (03)
  • [29] Medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow in throwing athletes
    Dodson, Christopher C.
    Thomas, Adrian
    Dines, Joshua S.
    Nho, Shane J.
    Williams, Riley J., III
    Altchek, David W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (12): : 1926 - 1932
  • [30] Ulnar collateral ligament injury in the elbow: current trends for treatment
    Smith, Matthew, V
    Bernholt, David L.
    ANNALS OF JOINT, 2020, 5 (02):