Stop Criteria for Flexure for Proof Load Testing of Reinforced Concrete Structures

被引:8
|
作者
Lantsoght, Eva O. L. [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yuguang [2 ]
van der Veen, Cor [2 ]
Hordijk, Dick A. [2 ]
de Boer, Ane [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ San Francisco Quito, Politecn, Quito, Ecuador
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Concrete Struct, Dept Engn Struct Civil Engn & Geoscienoes, Delft, Netherlands
[3] Ane Boer Consultancy, Arnhem, Netherlands
关键词
assessment; bending moment capacity; crack width; field test; proof load test; reinforced concrete; reinforced concrete bridge; strain; VIADUCT; FIELD;
D O I
10.3389/fbuil.2019.00047
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Existing bridges with large uncertainties can be assessed with a proof load test. In a proof load test, a load representative of the factored live load is applied to the bridge at the critical position. If the bridge can carry this load without distress, the proof load test shows experimentally that the bridge fulfills the requirements of the code. Because large loads are applied during proof load tests, the structure or element that is tested needs to be carefully monitored during the test. The monitored structural responses are interpreted in terms of stop criteria. Existing stop criteria for flexure in reinforced concrete can be extended with theoretical considerations. These proposed stop criteria are then verified with experimental results: reinforced concrete beams failing in flexure and tested in the laboratory, a collapse test on an existing reinforced concrete slab bridge that reached flexural distress, and the pilot proof load tests that were carried out in the Netherlands and in which no distress was observed. The tests in which failure was obtained are used to evaluate the margin of safety provided by the proposed stop criteria. The available pilot proof load tests are analyzed to see if the proposed stop criteria are not overly conservative. The result of this comparison is that the stop criteria are never exceeded. Therefore, the proposed stop criteria can be used for proof load tests for the failure mode of bending moment in reinforced concrete structures.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Flexure and shear in reinforced concrete members
    Desai, Satish
    Structural Engineer, 2004, 82 (23-24): : 25 - 29
  • [22] Reinforced Lightweight Concrete Beams in Flexure
    Sin, Lim Hwee
    Huan, Wee Tiong
    Islam, Md Rafiqul
    Mansur, Md Abul
    ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2011, 108 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [23] Ductility of slender reinforced concrete columns under monotonic flexure and constant axial load
    Barrera, A. C.
    Bonet, J. L.
    Romero, M. L.
    Fernandez, M. A.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2012, 40 : 398 - 412
  • [24] LOAD-DEFLECTION CURVES FOR FIBER-REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS IN FLEXURE - REPLY
    HUGHES, BP
    FATTUHI, NI
    MAGAZINE OF CONCRETE RESEARCH, 1978, 30 (105) : 227 - 228
  • [25] Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading
    Lantsoght, E. O. L.
    Yang, Y.
    Tersteeg, R. H. D.
    van der Veen, C.
    de Boer, A.
    LIFE-CYCLE OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS: EMPHASIS ON SUSTAINABLE CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE, 2017, : 1064 - 1071
  • [26] ULTRASONIC TESTING OF STRENGTH OF LOADED CONCRETE AND REINFORCED-CONCRETE STRUCTURES
    VAINSHTOK, II
    GOIKHMAN, AY
    YAMSHCHIKOV, VS
    SOVIET PHYSICS ACOUSTICS-USSR, 1976, 22 (04): : 336 - 338
  • [27] Radiometric Methods for Testing Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Structures and Products.
    Vorob'ev, V.A.
    Yakovlev, A.I.
    Breitman, Z.M.
    1600,
  • [28] Modeling Testing of Reinforced Concrete Block Masonry Structures
    Huang, Liang
    Chen, Shengyun
    Shi, Chuxian
    Gao, Xiang
    ADVANCES IN CONCRETE AND STRUCTURES, 2009, 400-402 : 911 - 916
  • [29] Modeling testing of reinforced concrete block masonry structures
    Huang, Liang
    Chen, Shengyun
    Shi, Chuxian
    Gao, Xiang
    Key Engineering Materials, 2009, 400-402 : 911 - 916
  • [30] Some relevant experiences from proof load testing of concrete bridges
    Olaszek, P.
    Casas, J. R.
    Swit, G.
    LIFE-CYCLE OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS: EMPHASIS ON SUSTAINABLE CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE, 2017, : 1092 - 1099