Detection and typing of cutaneous human papillomavirus types-A comparison of three different methods

被引:5
|
作者
Antonsson, Annika [1 ]
Michael, Kristina M. [2 ]
Pawlita, Michael [2 ]
Lehmann, Mandy D. [3 ]
Nindl, Ingo [3 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Inst Med Res, Dept Populat Hlth, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia
[2] German Canc Res Ctr, Infect & Canc Program, Dept Genome Modificat & Carcinogenesis, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Rudolf Virchow, DKFZ Charite Cooperat, Skin Canc Ctr Charite, Dept Dermatol Venereol & Allergy,Charite, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Cutaneous human papillomavirus (HPV); Comparison of detection methods; BGC-PCR RLB; McPG; FAP PCR; Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; LINE-BLOTTING SYSTEM; EPIDERMODYSPLASIA-VERRUCIFORMIS; SKIN-CANCER; BETAPAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTION; GENOMIC CHARACTERIZATION; E6; PROTEINS; DNA; APOPTOSIS; BETA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.10.010
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Cutaneous human papillomavirus (HPV) may play a role in the development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. HPV copy numbers in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma are very low and hence sensitive and reliable detection methods are important, particularly to examine the natural history of cutaneous HPV. In the present study, the presence of cutaneous HPV types was examined in 194 skin swabs and in a subgroup of 91 skin swabs, and compared using three different PCR based methods: (i) beta/gamma cutaneous HPV PCR reverse-line-blotting (BGC-PCR RIB), (ii) multiplex cutaneous papillomavirus genotyping (McPG) and (iii) FAP PCR. The HPV prevalence was 75% (68/91) with BGC-PCR RLB, 64% (124/194) with McPG and 72% (139/194) with FAP PCR. The agreement for the detection of HPV between the three methods in the subset of 91 samples was 73% (66/91; kappa = 0.34) for BGC-PCR RLB and McPG, 75% (68/91; kappa = 0.32) for BGC-PCR RLB and FAP PCR, and 69% (63/91; kappa = 0.25) for McPG and FAP PCR. For McPG and PAP PCR, 194 specimens were tested in total, with an overall agreement of 66% (129/194; kappa = 0.24) for the detection of HPV. The concordance between the three methods was moderate, which could be explained by different HPV types detectable with each method; the high number of multiple infections and the low viral copy number in human skin. Overall, many cutaneous HPV types were identified and multiple HPV types were found frequently in the human skin swabs. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 310
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Detection and typing of human papillomavirus DNA in paired urine and cervical scrapes
    S. Strauss
    J.Z. Jordens
    D. McBride
    C. Sonnex
    S. Edwards
    U. Desselberger
    P. Watt
    J.J. Gray
    [J]. European Journal of Epidemiology, 1999, 15 : 537 - 543
  • [42] Human Papillomavirus Genome based Detection and Typing: A Holistic Molecular Approach
    Gautam, Abhilasha
    Gedda, Mallikarjuna R.
    Rai, Madhukar
    Sundar, Shyam
    Chakravarty, Jaya
    [J]. CURRENT MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2019, 19 (04) : 237 - 246
  • [43] Evaluation of commercial kits for the detection and typing of human papillomavirus in cervical swabs
    Venturoli, S
    Bonvicini, F
    Cricca, M
    Gallinella, G
    Giosa, F
    Farinazzo, F
    Stefanuto, G
    Musiani, M
    Zerbini, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2002, 105 (01) : 49 - 56
  • [44] Low-density addressable array for the detection and typing of the human papillomavirus
    Delrio-Lafreniere, SA
    Browning, MK
    McGlennen, RC
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2004, 48 (01) : 23 - 31
  • [45] Molecular Detection and Typing of Human Papillomavirus in Men from Northwestern Mexico
    Montoya-Fuentes, Hector
    Rodriguez-Martin, Araceli
    Pena-Iniguez, Daniel Ivan
    Gonzalez-Bonilla, Cesar Raul
    Rosales-Gomez, Roberto Carlos
    Gallegos-Arreola, Martha Patricia
    Santoscoy-Ascencio, Guillermo
    Gutierrez-Rubio, Susan Andrea
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 51 (07) : 675 - 682
  • [46] Comparison of Three Methods for Diagnosis of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
    Pourmohammadi, B.
    Motazedian, M. H.
    Hatam, G. R.
    Kalantari, M.
    Habibi, P.
    Sarkari, B.
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY, 2010, 5 (04) : 1 - 8
  • [47] Molecular detection methods of human papillomavirus (HPV)
    Zaravinos, Apostolos
    Mammas, Ioannis N.
    Sourvinos, George
    Spandidos, Demetrios A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MARKERS, 2009, 24 (04): : 215 - 222
  • [48] Comparison Of Different Types Of Nasal Sampling For The Detection Of Human Rhinovirus In Children
    Cox, D. W.
    Khoo, S. -K.
    Bizzintino, J. A.
    Lee, W. M.
    Davis, P.
    Weeke, L. C.
    Geelhoed, G. C.
    Gern, J.
    Goldblatt, J.
    Le Souef, P. N.
    Laing, I. A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 183
  • [49] Molecular methods for the detection of human papillomavirus infection
    Lorincz, AT
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1996, 23 (03) : 707 - +
  • [50] Hybrid Capture® 2 vs HPV Consensus kit®:: Comparison of 2 assays for human papillomavirus detection and typing
    Hantz, S
    Caly, H
    Decroisette, E
    Fermeaux, V
    Bakeland, D
    Pascal, B
    Darreye, G
    Dussartre, C
    Rogez, S
    Aubard, Y
    Denis, F
    Alain, S
    [J]. PATHOLOGIE BIOLOGIE, 2005, 53 (8-9): : 556 - 562