Fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and hosts association in different ecosystems in Uruguay

被引:2
|
作者
Victoria Calvo, Maria [1 ]
Delgado, Soledad [1 ]
Duarte, Felicia [1 ]
Garcia, Flavio R. M. [2 ]
Scatoni, Iris [1 ]
Gonzalez, Andres [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ la Republ, Fac Agron, Dept Protecc Vegetal, Unidad Entomol, Av Garzon 780, Montevideo 12900, Uruguay
[2] Univ Fed Pelotas, Inst Biol, Dept Ecol Zool & Genet, Lab Ecol Insetos, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ la Republ, Fac Quim, Lab Ecol Quim, Montevideo, Uruguay
关键词
Ceratitis capitata; Anastrepha fraterculus; native fruit hosts; citrus pests; deciduous fruit trees; ANASTREPHA-FRATERCULUS DIPTERA; CERATITIS-CAPITATA DIPTERA; FLY DIPTERA; COMPLEX DIPTERA; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; SANTA-CATARINA; PATTERNS; RECOGNITION; INFESTATION; PARASITOIDS;
D O I
10.1080/09670874.2022.2126023
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Thorough and systematic surveys of host associations of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata are lacking in Uruguay. Our aim was to establish the host status in field conditions and the pattern of use of different fruit species in agroecosystems and wild environments in Uruguay. Tephritid monitoring was conducted in citrus and deciduous fruit orchards using McPhail traps baited with four PBX (R) yeast/borax pellets. A survey of host fruits was conducted by collecting fruits in commercial and non-commercial orchards and wild vegetation. Ceratitis capitata and A. fraterculus were the only two economically important fruit fly species recorded. Ceratitis capitata prevailed in citrus groves and deciduous fruit orchards associated with commercial and disturbed environments whereas A. fraterculus was associated mostly with non-commercial fruits and undisturbed ecosystems. The differences in abundance of C. capitata and A. fraterculus observed in different hosts and ecosystems may be related to factors such as host association, resource competition, environmental conditions and parasitism, among others that are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 380
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] POPULATION STUDIES OF FRUIT-FLIES (DIPTERA, TEPHRITIDAE) IN SOUTHEAST QUEENSLAND
    DREW, RAI
    HOOPER, GHS
    OECOLOGIA, 1983, 56 (2-3) : 153 - 159
  • [42] A review of stalk-eyed fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Trypetinae)
    Chen, Xiaolin
    Zhang, Yanzhou
    Li, Jie
    Zhu, Chaodong
    ZOOTAXA, 2010, (2654) : 1 - 16
  • [44] New and confirmed records of fruit flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) from Italy
    Mazzon, Luca
    Whitmore, Daniel
    Cerretti, Pierfilippo
    Korneyev, Valery A.
    BIODIVERSITY DATA JOURNAL, 2021, 9 : 1 - 14
  • [45] Easy-to-handle sticky trap for fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae)
    Robacker, DC
    Heath, RR
    FLORIDA ENTOMOLOGIST, 2001, 84 (02) : 302 - 304
  • [46] Host plant records for fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Southeast Asia
    Allwood, AJ
    Chinajariyawong, A
    Kritsaneepaiboon, S
    Drew, RAI
    Hamacek, EL
    Hancock, DL
    Hengsawad, C
    Jipanin, JC
    Jirasurat, M
    Krong, CK
    Leong, CTS
    Vijaysegaran, S
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY, 1999, : 1 - 92
  • [47] New records of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in the Alagoas State, Brazil
    da Costa, Simone Silva
    dos Santos, Jakeline Maria
    Forti Broglio, Sonia Maria
    Dias-Pini, Nivia da Silva
    Gomez-Torres, Mariuxi
    REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE ENTOMOLOGIA, 2019, 45 (01):
  • [48] Oviposition Responses of Female Mediterranean Fruit Flies (Diptera:Tephritidae) to Fruit Volatile Compounds
    Antonatos, Spyridon
    Papadopoulos, Nikolaos T.
    Anastasaki, Eirini
    Kimbaris, Athanasios
    Papachristos, Dimitrios P.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 2021, 114 (06) : 2307 - 2314
  • [49] Species Composition of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Selected Fruit Crops in Northeastern Ethiopia
    Mihretie, Aderajew
    Weldehawariat, Yitbarek
    Abera, Merkuz
    PSYCHE-A JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY, 2024, 2024
  • [50] DEVELOPMENT OF ATTRACTANTS FOR MONITORING CARIBBEAN FRUIT-FLIES (DIPTERA, TEPHRITIDAE)
    HEATH, RR
    EPSKY, ND
    LANDOLT, PJ
    SIVINSKI, J
    FLORIDA ENTOMOLOGIST, 1993, 76 (02) : 233 - 244