Nonadiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: Treatment of electronic decoherence

被引:135
|
作者
Nelson, Tammie [1 ,2 ]
Fernandez-Alberti, Sebastian [3 ]
Roitberg, Adrian E. [4 ,5 ]
Tretiak, Sergei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Div Theoret, Ctr Nonlinear Studies CNLS, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[2] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Ctr Integrated Nanotechnol CINT, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[3] Univ Nacl Quilmes, Bernal, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Phys, Quantum Theory Project, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[5] Univ Florida, Dept Chem, Quantum Theory Project, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS | 2013年 / 138卷 / 22期
关键词
UNIDIRECTIONAL ENERGY-TRANSFER; QUANTUM DECOHERENCE; PROTON-TRANSFER; COHERENCE; DECAY; EXCITATIONS; ALGORITHM; RATES;
D O I
10.1063/1.4809568
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Within the fewest switches surface hopping (FSSH) formulation, a swarm of independent trajectories is propagated and the equations of motion for the quantum coefficients are evolved coherently along each independent nuclear trajectory. That is, the phase factors, or quantum amplitudes, are retained. At a region of strong coupling, a trajectory can branch into multiple wavepackets. Directly following a hop, the two wavepackets remain in a region of nonadiabatic coupling and continue exchanging population. After these wavepackets have sufficiently separated in phase space, they should begin to evolve independently from one another, the process known as decoherence. Decoherence is not accounted for in the standard surface hopping algorithm and leads to internal inconsistency. FSSH is designed to ensure that at any time, the fraction of classical trajectories evolving on each quantum state is equal to the average quantum probability for that state. However, in many systems this internal consistency requirement is violated. Treating decoherence is an inherent problem that can be addressed by implementing some form of decoherence correction to the standard FSSH algorithm. In this study, we have implemented two forms of the instantaneous decoherence procedure where coefficients are reinitialized following hops. We also test the energy-based decoherence correction (EDC) scheme proposed by Granucci et al. and a related version where the form of the decoherence time is taken from Truhlar's Coherent Switching with Decay of Mixing method. The sensitivity of the EDC results to changes in parameters is also evaluated. The application of these computationally inexpensive ad hoc methods is demonstrated in the simulation of nonradiative relaxation in two conjugated oligomer systems, specifically poly-phenylene vinylene and poly-phenylene ethynylene. We find that methods that have been used successfully for treating small systems do not necessarily translate to large polyatomic systems and their success depends on the particular system under study. (C) 2013 AIP Publishing LLC.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] First Principles Nonadiabatic Excited-State Molecular Dynamics in NWChem
    Song, Huajing
    Fischer, Sean A.
    Zhang, Yu
    Cramer, Christopher J.
    Mukamel, Shaul
    Govind, Niranjan
    Tretiak, Sergei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2020, 16 (10) : 6418 - 6427
  • [2] Nonadiabatic Excited-State Molecular Dynamics Methodologies: Comparison and Convergence
    Freixas, Victor M.
    White, Alexander J.
    Nelson, Tammie
    Song, Huajing
    Makhov, Dmitry, V
    Shalashilin, Dmitrii
    Fernandez-Alberti, Sebastian
    Tretiale, Sergei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2021, 12 (11): : 2970 - 2982
  • [3] Nonadiabatic Excited-State Molecular Dynamics: On-the-Fly Reduction of Excited States
    Nelson, Tammie
    Fernandez-Alberti, Sebastian
    Tretiak, Sergei
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 251
  • [4] Nonadiabatic Excited-State Molecular Dynamics Modeling of Photoinduced Dynamics in Conjugated Molecules
    Nelson, Tammie
    Fernandez-Alberti, Sebastian
    Chernyak, Vladimir
    Roitberg, Adrian E.
    Tretiak, Sergei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2011, 115 (18): : 5402 - 5414
  • [5] SpaINN: equivariant message passing for excited-state nonadiabatic molecular dynamics
    Mausenberger, Sascha
    Mueller, Carolin
    Tkatchenko, Alexandre
    Marquetand, Philipp
    Gonzalez, Leticia
    Westermayr, Julia
    [J]. CHEMICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 15 (38) : 15880 - 15890
  • [6] Nonadiabatic Excited-State Molecular Dynamics for Open-Shell Systems
    Zhang, Yu
    Li, Linqiu
    Tretiak, Sergei
    Nelson, Tammie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2020, 16 (04) : 2053 - 2064
  • [7] Nonadiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: Numerical tests of convergence and parameters
    Nelson, Tammie
    Fernandez-Alberti, Sebastian
    Chernyak, Vladimir
    Roitberg, Adrian E.
    Tretiak, Sergei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 136 (05):
  • [8] Nonadiabatic Excited-State Dynamics with Machine Learning
    Dral, Pavlo O.
    Barbatti, Mario
    Thiel, Walter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2018, 9 (19): : 5660 - 5663
  • [9] Deep Learning for Nonadiabatic Excited-State Dynamics
    Chen, Wen-Kai
    Liu, Xiang-Yang
    Fang, Wei-Hai
    Dral, Pavlo O.
    Cui, Ganglong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2018, 9 (23): : 6702 - 6708
  • [10] Exploring the effects of quantum decoherence on the excited-state dynamics of molecular systems
    Eric R. Heller
    Jan-Ole Joswig
    Gotthard Seifert
    [J]. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 2021, 140