Automatic Repair of Same-Timestamp Errors in Business Process Event Logs

被引:11
|
作者
Conforti, Raffaele [1 ]
La Rosa, Marcello [2 ]
Ter Hofstede, Arthur H. M. [3 ]
Augusto, Adriano [2 ]
机构
[1] Proc Diamond, Melbourne, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
来源
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
DISCOVERY;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-58666-9_19
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper contributes an approach for automatically correcting "same-timestamp" errors in business process event logs. These errors consist in multiple events exhibiting the same timestamp within a given process instance. Such errors are common in practice and can be due to the logging granularity or the performance load of the logging system. Analyzing logs that have not been properly screened for such problems is likely to lead to wrong or misleading process insights. The proposed approach revolves around two techniques: one to reorder events with same-timestamp errors, the other to assign an estimated timestamp to each such event. The approach has been implemented in a software prototype and extensively evaluated in different settings, using both artificial and real-life logs. The experiments show that the approach significantly reduces the number of inaccurate timestamps, while the reordering of events scales well to large and complex datasets. The evaluation is complemented by a case study in the meat & livestock domain showing the usefulness of the approach in practice.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 345
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using Event Logs to Model Interarrival Times in Business Process Simulation
    Martin, Niels
    Depaire, Benoit
    Caris, An
    [J]. BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT WORKSHOPS, (BPM 2015), 2016, 256 : 255 - 267
  • [22] Belief network discovery from event logs for business process analysis
    Savickas, Titas
    Vasilecas, Olegas
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2018, 100 : 258 - 266
  • [23] Collaborative and Interactive Detection and Repair of Activity Labels in Process Event Logs
    Sadeghianasl, Sareh
    ter Hofstede, Arthur H. M.
    Suriadi, Suriadi
    Turkay, Selen
    [J]. 2020 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROCESS MINING (ICPM 2020), 2020, : 41 - 48
  • [24] An empirical comparison of classification techniques for next event prediction using business process event logs
    Tama, Bayu Adhi
    Comuzzi, Marco
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 129 : 233 - 245
  • [25] Cross-Instance Regulatory Compliance Checking of Business Process Event Logs
    van Beest, Nick
    Groefsema, Heerko
    Cryer, Adrian
    Governatori, Guido
    Tosatto, Silvano Colombo
    Burke, Hannah
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2023, 49 (11) : 4917 - 4931
  • [26] Stage-based discovery of business process models from event logs
    Hoang Nguyen
    Dumas, Marlon
    ter Hofstede, Arthur H. M.
    La Rosa, Marcello
    Maggi, Fabrizio Maria
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2019, 84 : 214 - 237
  • [27] Filtering out Infrequent Events by Expectation from Business Process Event Logs
    Huang, Ying
    Lai, Xiangjing
    Huang, Yiwang
    [J]. 2018 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY (CIS), 2018, : 374 - 377
  • [28] Multi-perspective Comparison of Business Process Variants Based on Event Logs
    Hoang Nguyen
    Dumas, Marlon
    La Rosa, Marcello
    ter Hofstede, Arthur H. M.
    [J]. CONCEPTUAL MODELING, ER 2018, 2018, 11157 : 449 - 459
  • [29] Humans-in-the-loop: Gamifying activity label repair in process event logs
    Sadeghianasl, Sareh
    Ter Hofstede, Arthur H. M.
    Wynn, Moe Thandar
    Turkay, Selen
    [J]. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 132
  • [30] Split Miner: Discovering Accurate and Simple Business Process Models from Event Logs
    Augusto, Adriano
    Conforti, Raffaele
    Dumas, Marlon
    La Rosa, Marcello
    [J]. 2017 17TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING (ICDM), 2017, : 1 - 10