Comparison between two methods for estimating variance components for production traits in laying hens

被引:0
|
作者
Preisinger, R [1 ]
Savas, T [1 ]
机构
[1] CHRISTIAN ALBRECHTS UNIV KIEL,INST TIERZUCHT & TIERHALTUNG,D-24118 KIEL,GERMANY
来源
ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE | 1997年 / 69卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of the study was to compare variance components estimated with a sire model and HENDERSON III with an animal model and REML for egg production and other production traits in laying hens. Special attention was paid on the estimation of covariances between different parts (periods) of full year egg production. Variance components were estimated from performance data of 2618 pure line Rhode Island Red and 6355 White Rock laying hens. Heritability estimates based on REML in different periods for egg production feed intake and body weight have been higher than for HENDERSON III. For different egg weights REML showed more uniform estimates and no significant increase compared to HENDERSON III. Correlations between egg production in different periods can be outside of the parameter range when estimated with HENDERSON III. If the complex relationships are utilized parameters from different periods are more consistent. For breeding value estimation egg production in period 1, period 2 to 6 and period 7 to 10 should be used in a multiple trait animal model in combination with other production and quality traits. Production rate in period 1 has to be used as a separate trait, because it is high correlated with age at sexual maturity. Heritability for period 1 is higher than in other periods and correlations to other periods differ clearly from later stages of production.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 152
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of behavior, physical condition and performance of laying hens in four molting methods
    Shimmura, Tsuyoshi
    Eguchi, Yusuke
    Uetake, Katsuji
    Tanaka, Toshio
    ANIMAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2008, 79 (01) : 129 - 138
  • [42] A comparison of welfare, health and production performance of laying hens reared in cages or in aviaries
    Michel, V
    Huonnic, D
    BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2003, 44 (05) : 775 - 776
  • [43] Production and egg quality traits of organic hens in a laying period under commercial conditions in Turkey
    Saribas, Onur
    Yamak, Umut Sami
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY & ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2020, 44 (06): : 1188 - 1195
  • [44] Effects of lupin seed supplementation on egg production performance, and qualitative egg traits in laying hens
    Park, J. H.
    Lee, S. I.
    Kim, I. H.
    VETERINARNI MEDICINA, 2016, 61 (12) : 701 - 709
  • [45] Plasma alkaline phosphatase and production traits in laying hens as influenced by dietary protein, strain and age
    Al-Bustany, Z
    Al-Athari, AK
    Abdul-Hassan, IA
    BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 1998, 39 (04) : 568 - 571
  • [46] Correlation of chemical and physical corn kernel traits with production performance in broiler chickens and laying hens
    Moore, S. M.
    Stalder, K. J.
    Beitz, D. C.
    Stahl, C. H.
    Fithian, W. A.
    Bregendahl, K.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2008, 87 (04) : 665 - 676
  • [47] Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Egg-Production Traits in Commercial Laying Breeder Hens
    Oliveira EB
    Almeida LGB
    Rocha DT
    Furian TQ
    Borges KA
    Moraes HLS
    Nascimento VP
    Salle CTP
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF POULTRY SCIENCE, 2022, 24 (04) : 1 - 10
  • [48] INCOMPLETE 2-WAY RANDOM MODELS - A NUMERICAL COMPARISON OF 3 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING VARIANCE-COMPONENTS
    SEEGER, P
    LINDQVIST, B
    RONNINGEN, K
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA, 1981, 31 (02): : 132 - 138
  • [49] A comparison of two methods for estimating prevalence
    Petersen, Martin R.
    Deddens, James A.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2008, 8 (1)
  • [50] Effects of two different rearing systems (organic and barn) on production performance, animal welfare traits and egg quality characteristics in laying hens
    Ferrante, Valentina
    Lolli, Susanna
    Vezzoli, Giuseppe
    Cavalchini, Luigi Guidobono
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2009, 8 (02) : 165 - 174