Social Life-Cycle Assessment: A Review by Bibliometric Analysis

被引:75
|
作者
Huertas-Valdivia, Irene [1 ]
Ferrari, Anna Maria [2 ]
Settembre-Blundo, Davide [1 ,3 ]
Garcia-Muina, Fernando E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Dept Business Adm ADO, Appl Econ & Fundaments Econ Anal 2, Madrid 28032, Spain
[2] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Dept Sci & Methods Engn, I-42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy
[3] Grp Ceramiche Gresmalt, Via Mosca 4, I-41049 Sassuolo, Italy
关键词
Social Life-Cycle Assessment (S-LCA); bibliometric methods; science mapping; co-word analysis; social impacts; ASSESSMENT MODEL; SUPPLY CHAINS; S-LCA; SUSTAINABILITY; IMPACTS; METHODOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; CHALLENGES; FRAMEWORK; HOTSPOT;
D O I
10.3390/su12156211
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study examined the literature on social life-cycle assessment (S-LCA) published in the last 15 years (2003-2018) using bibliometric methods. Applying scientific mapping and analyzing publication performance, the study describes the structure of and trends in S-LCA publications in terms of related subject categories, authors, journals, countries, and highly cited articles. Challenges and research gaps in the S-LCA literature were also explored. The content of related papers published in the ISI Web of Science databases was examined to identify the main themes investigated, evolution of publication activity, and most representative elements. Analyses were conducted with SciMAT software. This tool enables researchers to map research specialties by extracting qualitative information in the specialized literature and representing it using quantitative measures. The results show rapid and exponential growth of the S-LCA research line in the past ten years, with a clear upward trend in related publications (mostly case studies), especially after publication of the UNEP/SETAC Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products in 2009: 66% of all articles published on S-LCA were published during the period 2015-2018, primarily by European authors. The findings also delineate S-LCA as a highly fragmented research field that has been applied to diverse sectors (agriculture, bioenergy, transport, water management, chemical products, electronics, etc.), mainly in non-European countries. Critical questions concerning methods, framework, paradigms, and indicators remain to be resolved. This study provides insight into the publication performance of S-LCA, characterizing its intellectual structure and salient authors and works. In identifying hotspots in the S-LCA research, the study provides a useful state-of-the-art reference guide for academics and reveals critical research gaps and potential research avenues for future studies to advance in consolidating the discipline.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Life Cycle Assessment Research Trends and Implications: A Bibliometric Analysis
    Moutik, Badr
    Summerscales, John
    Graham-Jones, Jasper
    Pemberton, Richard
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (18)
  • [42] Mapping the scientific research on life cycle assessment: a bibliometric analysis
    Qian Hou
    Guozhu Mao
    Lin Zhao
    Huibin Du
    Jian Zuo
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2015, 20 : 541 - 555
  • [43] Life-cycle assessment and life-cycle cost assessment of lithium-ion batteries for passenger ferry
    Guven, Denizhan
    Kayalica, M. Ozgur
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 115
  • [44] Development of a methodological framework for social life-cycle assessment of novel technologies
    Berthe van Haaster
    Andreas Ciroth
    João Fontes
    Richard Wood
    Andrea Ramirez
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 423 - 440
  • [45] Measuring Corporate Social and Environmental Performance: The Extended Life-Cycle Assessment
    Caroline Gauthier
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2005, 59 : 199 - 206
  • [46] Measuring corporate social and environmental performance: The extended life-cycle assessment
    Gauthier, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2005, 59 (1-2) : 199 - 206
  • [47] Development of a methodological framework for social life-cycle assessment of novel technologies
    van Haaster, Berthe
    Ciroth, Andreas
    Fontes, Joao
    Wood, Richard
    Ramirez, Andrea
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (03): : 423 - 440
  • [48] Analysis of material recovery facilities for use in life-cycle assessment
    Pressley, Phillip N.
    Levis, James W.
    Damgaard, Anders
    Barlaz, Morton A.
    DeCarolis, Joseph F.
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 35 : 307 - 317
  • [49] Integrate life-cycle assessment and risk analysis results, not methods
    Linkov I.
    Trump B.D.
    Wender B.A.
    Seager T.P.
    Kennedy A.J.
    Keisler J.M.
    [J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2017, 12 (8) : 740 - 743
  • [50] Life-cycle seismic repair cost assessment and sensitivity analysis
    Taflanidis, A. A.
    [J]. APPLICATIONS OF STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2011, : 943 - 951