Energy and carbon footprint analysis of municipal wastewater treatment process integrated with food waste disposer

被引:4
|
作者
Guan, Jianyu [1 ]
Zhuang, Huichuan [1 ]
Lau, Chun Yin [1 ]
Leng, Ling [1 ]
Yeung, Chi Shun [1 ]
Vuppaladadiyam, Arun Krishna [1 ]
Wang, Huaimin [1 ]
Tse, Ho-Yin [1 ]
Leu, Shao-Yuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Food waste; Sewage treatment system; Aeration efficiency; Greenhouse gas emission; Food waste disposer; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; RETENTION TIME; SOLID-WASTE; AERATION; SLUDGE; MANAGEMENT; EMISSION; IMPACTS; METHANE; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134063
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Household food waste (FW) management has become an emerging environmental issue affecting sustainable urban development. The application of in-sink domestic food waste disposers (FWDs) have brought significant public attentions due to its simplified waste handling process and reduced household expenses. However, the potentail negative impacts of mixing FW in the sewer system, i.e., the reduction of aeration efficiency in wastewater treatment processes (WWTPs) and corresponding increase of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission, has not been quantified. In this study, real-time oxygen transfer efficiency in processing water was measured in WWTPs receiving negligible amount of FW and compared with those receiving sewage combined with FWD effluent. WWTP receiving sewage with FW had 6-10% lower oxygen transfer rate than those without FW, resulting in extra energy consumptions of 0.25-0.30 kWh/m3 and GHG emissions of 0.35-0.41 kg CO2/m3. For estimating the substantial impacts of FWD to the carbon cycle, sludge treatment scenarios were designed among anaerobic digestion (AD), incineration, and direct landfill disposal. Compared with AD ( 0.07 kWh/kg) and incineration (0.112 kWh/kg), FWD/WWTP consumed more energy (0.69-0.9 kWh/kg) and most of which (similar to 64%) was required by aeration. The operating costs of WWTPs also increased by 1.6-2.1 times in comparison with those did not receive FW. The application of FWD, however, could reduce the overall GHG emissions by 35.2% in comparison with direct landfilling. Decision-makers should guide householders and waste management practitioners through new policies such as carbon credits and/or waste charging scheme to support more environmentalfriendly disposal methods of FW, especally when the maturity of socio-economic conditions are of concerns. Compared with AD and incineration, FWD may be a compromising alternative to control GHG emissions with existing wastewater treatment facilities especially to those regions where complete FW classification and treatment are not well-established.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life cycle water footprint and carbon footprint analysis of municipal sludge plasma gasification process
    Cui, Peizhe
    Xu, Zaifeng
    Yao, Dong
    Qi, Huaqing
    Zhu, Zhaoyou
    Wang, Yinglong
    Li, Xin
    Liu, Zhiqiang
    Yang, Sheng
    [J]. ENERGY, 2022, 261
  • [32] CARBON TREATMENT OF A MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER
    BURNS, DE
    SHELL, GL
    [J]. JOURNAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION, 1974, 46 (01): : 148 - 164
  • [33] Tracing pharmaceuticals in a municipal plant for integrated wastewater and organic solid waste treatment
    Jelic, Aleksandra
    Fatone, Francesco
    Di Fabio, Silvia
    Petrovic, Mira
    Cecchi, Franco
    Barcelo, Damia
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 433 : 352 - 361
  • [34] EXERGETIC OPTIMIZATION OF AN INTEGRATED MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATOR AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
    Galeano-Cabral J.R.
    Porto-Hernandez L.A.
    Vargas J.V.C.
    Ordonez J.C.
    [J]. International Journal of Energy for a Clean Environment, 2022, 23 (04) : 95 - 108
  • [35] The small footprint wastewater treatment process
    Stephenson, Tom
    Mann, Allan
    Upton, John
    [J]. Chemistry and Industry (London), 1993, (14): : 533 - 536
  • [36] Carbon footprint analysis of advanced biological wastewater treatment plant
    Karakas, Aysenur
    Tozum-Akgul, Seda
    Komesli, Okan Tarik
    Kaplan-Bekaroglu, Sehnaz Sule
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2024, 61
  • [37] Feasibility analysis for reduction of carbon footprint in a wastewater treatment plant
    Borzooei, Sina
    Campo, Giuseppe
    Cerutti, Alberto
    Meucci, Lorenza
    Panepinto, Deborah
    Ravina, Marco
    Riggio, Vincenzo
    Ruf, Barbara
    Scibilia, Gerardo
    Zanetti, Mariachiara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 271 (271)
  • [38] A review of enhanced municipal wastewater treatment through energy savings and carbon recovery to reduce discharge and CO2 footprint
    Du, Rui
    Li, Cong
    Liu, Qingtao
    Fan, Jiarui
    Peng, Yongzhen
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 364
  • [39] Carbon footprint analysis and comprehensive evaluation of municipal wastewater treatment plants under different typical upgrading and reconstruction modes
    Wang, Jinglin
    Zhang, Nan
    Xu, Shengjun
    Shao, Zhiping
    Jiang, Cancan
    Yuan, Hongying
    Wang, Cong
    Zheng, Xiaoxu
    Chi, Yongzhi
    Zhang, Weijun
    Wang, Dongsheng
    Zhuang, Xuliang
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 880
  • [40] The effect of lignocellulosic waste on biological treatment of municipal wastewater in anaerobic digestion process
    Rasouli, Majid
    Babaei, Hosein
    Ataeiyan, Behnam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, 2023, 18 (02) : 61 - 69