Energy and carbon footprint analysis of municipal wastewater treatment process integrated with food waste disposer

被引:4
|
作者
Guan, Jianyu [1 ]
Zhuang, Huichuan [1 ]
Lau, Chun Yin [1 ]
Leng, Ling [1 ]
Yeung, Chi Shun [1 ]
Vuppaladadiyam, Arun Krishna [1 ]
Wang, Huaimin [1 ]
Tse, Ho-Yin [1 ]
Leu, Shao-Yuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Food waste; Sewage treatment system; Aeration efficiency; Greenhouse gas emission; Food waste disposer; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; RETENTION TIME; SOLID-WASTE; AERATION; SLUDGE; MANAGEMENT; EMISSION; IMPACTS; METHANE; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134063
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Household food waste (FW) management has become an emerging environmental issue affecting sustainable urban development. The application of in-sink domestic food waste disposers (FWDs) have brought significant public attentions due to its simplified waste handling process and reduced household expenses. However, the potentail negative impacts of mixing FW in the sewer system, i.e., the reduction of aeration efficiency in wastewater treatment processes (WWTPs) and corresponding increase of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission, has not been quantified. In this study, real-time oxygen transfer efficiency in processing water was measured in WWTPs receiving negligible amount of FW and compared with those receiving sewage combined with FWD effluent. WWTP receiving sewage with FW had 6-10% lower oxygen transfer rate than those without FW, resulting in extra energy consumptions of 0.25-0.30 kWh/m3 and GHG emissions of 0.35-0.41 kg CO2/m3. For estimating the substantial impacts of FWD to the carbon cycle, sludge treatment scenarios were designed among anaerobic digestion (AD), incineration, and direct landfill disposal. Compared with AD ( 0.07 kWh/kg) and incineration (0.112 kWh/kg), FWD/WWTP consumed more energy (0.69-0.9 kWh/kg) and most of which (similar to 64%) was required by aeration. The operating costs of WWTPs also increased by 1.6-2.1 times in comparison with those did not receive FW. The application of FWD, however, could reduce the overall GHG emissions by 35.2% in comparison with direct landfilling. Decision-makers should guide householders and waste management practitioners through new policies such as carbon credits and/or waste charging scheme to support more environmentalfriendly disposal methods of FW, especally when the maturity of socio-economic conditions are of concerns. Compared with AD and incineration, FWD may be a compromising alternative to control GHG emissions with existing wastewater treatment facilities especially to those regions where complete FW classification and treatment are not well-established.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrated treatment of food waste with wastewater and sewage sludge: Energy and carbon footprint analysis with economic implications
    Iqbal, Asad
    Zan, Feixiang
    Siddiqui, Muhammad Ahmar
    Nizamuddin, Sabzoi
    Chen, Guanghao
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 825
  • [2] An integrated anaerobic system for on-site treatment of wastewater from food waste disposer
    Hu, Yong
    Shi, Chen
    Kobayashi, Takuro
    Xu, Kai-Qin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (15) : 17587 - 17595
  • [3] An integrated anaerobic system for on-site treatment of wastewater from food waste disposer
    Yong Hu
    Chen Shi
    Takuro Kobayashi
    Kai-Qin Xu
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 : 17587 - 17595
  • [4] Carbon footprint of integrated waste management systems with implications of food waste diversion into the wastewater stream
    Maalouf, Amani
    El-Fadel, Mutasem
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 133 : 263 - 277
  • [5] Energy neutrality versus carbon footprint minimization in municipal wastewater treatment plants
    Maktabifard, Mojtaba
    Zaborowska, Ewa
    Makinia, Jacek
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 300
  • [6] Impact of food waste addition in energy efficient municipal wastewater treatment by aerobic granular sludge process
    Cicekalan B.
    Berenji N.R.
    Aras M.F.
    Guven H.
    Koyuncu I.
    Ersahin M.E.
    Ozgun H.
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (20) : 29304 - 29320
  • [7] Lipid Production by Culturing Oleaginous Yeast and Algae with Food Waste and Municipal Wastewater in an Integrated Process
    Zhanyou Chi
    Yubin Zheng
    Anping Jiang
    Shulin Chen
    [J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2011, 165 : 442 - 453
  • [8] Lipid Production by Culturing Oleaginous Yeast and Algae with Food Waste and Municipal Wastewater in an Integrated Process
    Chi, Zhanyou
    Zheng, Yubin
    Jiang, Anping
    Chen, Shulin
    [J]. APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2011, 165 (02) : 442 - 453
  • [9] Economic, energy and carbon footprint assessment of integrated forward osmosis membrane bioreactor (FOMBR) process in urban wastewater treatment
    Ab Hamid, Nur Hafizah
    Smart, Simon
    Wang, David K.
    Koh, Kaniel Wei Jun
    Ng, Kalvin Jiak Chern
    Ye, Liu
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-WATER RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 6 (01) : 153 - 165
  • [10] Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste: Energy and carbon emission footprint
    Fan, Yee Van
    Klemes, Jiri Jaromir
    Lee, Chew Tin
    Perry, Simon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 223 : 888 - 897