Controls and Cooperation in Interactive and Non-Interactive Settings

被引:7
|
作者
Garrett, Jace B. [1 ]
Livingston, Jeffrey A. [2 ]
Tayler, William B. [3 ]
Cade, Nicole L. [4 ]
McVay, Sarah E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Clemson, SC 29631 USA
[2] Bentley Univ, Waltham, MA 02452 USA
[3] Brigham Young Univ, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
INDIRECT RECIPROCITY; SANCTIONING SYSTEMS; MEASURING TRUST; GIFT EXCHANGE; MEDIATOR; ORGANIZATIONS; ATTRIBUTION; PERFORMANCE; INTENTIONS; COSTS;
D O I
10.1111/1911-3846.12489
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Prior research finds that controls that induce cooperation among collaborators on a project increase trust, and that this increased trust increases subsequent cooperation among collaborators. We extend this work by investigating how controls influence cooperative behavior in two settings. The first is an interactive setting where people work together and can benefit from each other's work. The second is a non-interactive setting where people do not work together directly but where behavior can be observed. We propose that because controls are likely to engender greater trust and reciprocity in interactive settings than in non-interactive settings, the effect of controls on future cooperative behavior will be greater for controls in interactive settings than for controls in non-interactive settings. We find that controls in both settings increase future cooperative behavior, but the effect is significantly greater in interactive settings (where reciprocity and trust are more likely to develop). Furthermore, this increased cooperation is observed in an uncontrolled task, suggesting that the control fosters trust in others rather than trust in the control. These findings suggest that the benefits of controls are more substantial in work environments characterized by extensive teamwork and where employees benefit from each other's work.
引用
收藏
页码:2494 / 2515
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Non-interactive Mimblewimble Transactions, Revisited
    Fuchsbauer, Georg
    Orru, Michele
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CRYPTOLOGY- ASIACRYPT 2022, PT I, 2022, 13791 : 713 - 744
  • [42] Blockchains Enable Non-interactive MPC
    Goyal, Vipul
    Masserova, Elisaweta
    Parno, Bryan
    Song, Yifan
    [J]. THEORY OF CRYPTOGRAPHY, TCC 2021, PT II, 2021, 13043 : 162 - 193
  • [43] Non-interactive deniable ring authentication
    Susilo, W
    Mu, Y
    [J]. INFORMATION SECURITY AND CRYPTOLOGY - ICISC 2003, 2004, 2971 : 386 - 401
  • [44] Secure Non-interactive Reducibility is Decidable
    Bhushan, Kaartik
    Misra, Ankit Kumar
    Narayanan, Varun
    Prabhakaran, Manoj
    [J]. THEORY OF CRYPTOGRAPHY, TCC 2022, PT II, 2022, 13748 : 408 - 437
  • [45] Interactive vs. non-interactive knowledge production by faculty members
    Azagra-Caro, Joaquin M.
    Aznar-Marqez, Juana
    Blanco, Juan M.
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2008, 40 (10) : 1289 - 1297
  • [46] Interactivity and memory: Information processing of interactive versus non-interactive content
    Xu, Qian
    Sundar, S. Shyam
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 63 : 620 - 629
  • [47] PROCESSING OF INTERACTIVE AND NON-INTERACTIVE PICTURES IN PA LEARNING BY RETARDED PERSONS
    ASHFORD, DC
    BAUMEISTER, AA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENTAL DEFICIENCY, 1977, 82 (02): : 187 - 193
  • [48] Temporally stable boundary labeling for interactive and non-interactive dynamic scenes
    Bobak, Petr
    Cmolik, Ladislav
    Cadik, Martin
    [J]. COMPUTERS & GRAPHICS-UK, 2020, 91 : 265 - 278
  • [49] Students' engagement in reflective tasks: an investigation of interactive and non-interactive discourse corpora
    Farr, Fiona
    Riordan, Elaine
    [J]. CLASSROOM DISCOURSE, 2012, 3 (02) : 129 - 146
  • [50] Enhancement of non-interactive oblivious transfer scheme
    Huang, Hui-Feng
    Change, Chin-Chen
    Yeh, Jieh-Shan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, 2005, 4 : 196 - 199