Controls and Cooperation in Interactive and Non-Interactive Settings

被引:7
|
作者
Garrett, Jace B. [1 ]
Livingston, Jeffrey A. [2 ]
Tayler, William B. [3 ]
Cade, Nicole L. [4 ]
McVay, Sarah E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Clemson, SC 29631 USA
[2] Bentley Univ, Waltham, MA 02452 USA
[3] Brigham Young Univ, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
INDIRECT RECIPROCITY; SANCTIONING SYSTEMS; MEASURING TRUST; GIFT EXCHANGE; MEDIATOR; ORGANIZATIONS; ATTRIBUTION; PERFORMANCE; INTENTIONS; COSTS;
D O I
10.1111/1911-3846.12489
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Prior research finds that controls that induce cooperation among collaborators on a project increase trust, and that this increased trust increases subsequent cooperation among collaborators. We extend this work by investigating how controls influence cooperative behavior in two settings. The first is an interactive setting where people work together and can benefit from each other's work. The second is a non-interactive setting where people do not work together directly but where behavior can be observed. We propose that because controls are likely to engender greater trust and reciprocity in interactive settings than in non-interactive settings, the effect of controls on future cooperative behavior will be greater for controls in interactive settings than for controls in non-interactive settings. We find that controls in both settings increase future cooperative behavior, but the effect is significantly greater in interactive settings (where reciprocity and trust are more likely to develop). Furthermore, this increased cooperation is observed in an uncontrolled task, suggesting that the control fosters trust in others rather than trust in the control. These findings suggest that the benefits of controls are more substantial in work environments characterized by extensive teamwork and where employees benefit from each other's work.
引用
收藏
页码:2494 / 2515
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Different Talking Heads in Non-Interactive Settings
    Weiss, Benjamin
    Kuehnel, Christine
    Wechsung, Ina
    Moeller, Sebastian
    Fagel, Sascha
    [J]. HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, PT III: AMBIENT, UBIQUITOUS AND INTELLIGENT INTERACTION, 2009, 5612 : 349 - +
  • [2] MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM BETWEEN FUZZY SYMBOLS IN NON-INTERACTIVE AND WEAKLY NON-INTERACTIVE SITUATIONS
    AMBROSIO, R
    MARTINI, GB
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1984, 12 (01) : 27 - 35
  • [3] Non-interactive Confirmer Signatures
    Chow, Sherman S. M.
    Haralambiev, Kristiyan
    [J]. TOPICS IN CRYPTOLOGY - CT-RSA 2011, 2011, 6558 : 49 - +
  • [4] Information management in interactive and non-interactive suspenseful storytelling
    Delatorre, Pablo
    Leon, Carlos
    Salguero, Alberto
    Palomo-Duarte, Manuel
    Gervas, Pablo
    [J]. CONNECTION SCIENCE, 2019, 31 (01) : 82 - 101
  • [5] Non-interactive proofs of proximity
    Gur, Tom
    Rothblum, Ron D.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY, 2018, 27 (01) : 99 - 207
  • [6] The interactive vascular resistance amplifier and non-interactive reviewers
    Wright, CE
    Angus, JA
    Korner, PI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2002, 20 (05) : 1023 - 1027
  • [7] Applying Moving Average Filtering for Non-interactive Differential Privacy Settings
    Mivule, Kato
    Turner, Claude
    [J]. COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS, 2014, 36 : 409 - 415
  • [8] Non-interactive proofs of proximity
    Tom Gur
    Ron D. Rothblum
    [J]. computational complexity, 2018, 27 : 99 - 207
  • [9] Non-interactive private auctions
    Baudron, O
    Stern, J
    [J]. FINANCIAL CRYPTOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 2339 : 364 - 377
  • [10] Non-Interactive Anonymous Router
    Shi, Elaine
    Wu, Ke
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CRYPTOLOGY - EUROCRYPT 2021, PT III, 2021, 12698 : 489 - 520