Journal Editorial Policies, Animal Welfare, and the 3Rs

被引:66
|
作者
Osborne, Nicola J. [1 ]
Payne, Daisy
Newman, Michael L. [2 ]
机构
[1] RSPCA, Res Anim Dept, Southwater RH13 9RS, W Sussex, England
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS | 2009年 / 9卷 / 12期
关键词
3Rs; animal welfare; peer-reviewed journals; ethics of animal use;
D O I
10.1080/15265160903318343
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This study evaluates the editorial policies of a randomized sample of English language peer-reviewed journals that publish original research involving the use of animals. The aim is to identify whether journals have editorial policies relating to the use of animals in the research that they are prepared to publish and whether any policies are likely to promote animal welfare and dissemination of information on the 3Rs (reduction, refinement, replacement) within the scientific community. The results demonstrate that a significant proportion of journals publishing original research involving animals do not have any editorial policy relating to the use of animals. Of those journals that do have policies the majority simply request that the research be carried out in accordance with standard regulatory requirements. This paper aims to provide editors and publishers with the information they need to review their own editorial policies to ensure they are fulfilling their potential to promote animal welfare and dissemination of the 3Rs.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 59
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How Can Systematic Reviews Teach Us More about the Implementation of the 3Rs and Animal Welfare?
    Ritskes-Hoitinga, Merel
    van Luijk, Judith
    ANIMALS, 2019, 9 (12):
  • [22] The new paradigm in animal testing - "3Rs alternatives"
    Poh, Wen Tsin
    Stanslas, Johnson
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 153
  • [23] Resource efficiency: progress and challenges of 3Rs technologies and policies
    Khajuria, A.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT AND THE ENVIRONMENT VIII, 2016, 202 : 57 - 60
  • [24] Toward a common interpretation of the 3Rs principles in animal research
    Lauwereyns, Jan
    Bajramovic, Jeffrey
    Bert, Bettina
    Camenzind, Samuel
    De Kock, Joery
    Elezovic, Alisa
    Erden, Sevilay
    Gonzalez-Uarquin, Fernando
    Ulman, Yesim Isil
    Hoffmann, Orsolya Ivett
    Kitsara, Maria
    Kostomitsopoulos, Nikolaos
    Neuhaus, Winfried
    Petit-Demouliere, Benoit
    Pollo, Simone
    Riso, Brigida
    Schober, Sophie
    Sotiropoulos, Athanassia
    Thomas, Aurelie
    Vitale, Augusto
    Wilflingseder, Doris
    Ahluwalia, Arti
    LAB ANIMAL, 2024, 53 (12) : 347 - 350
  • [25] Editorial: Towards a new 3Rs era in experimental research
    Cederroth, Christopher R.
    Sandstrom, Jenny
    FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 18
  • [26] One animal, two protocols - An appropriate application of the 3Rs?
    Silverman J.
    Lab Animal, 2007, 36 (3) : 13 - 13
  • [27] Editorial: 3Rs tightly intertwined to maintain genome stability
    Lisby, Michael
    Mortensen, Uffe H.
    FEMS YEAST RESEARCH, 2017, 17 (01)
  • [28] Animal testing Framework first to measure 3Rs' impact
    Burke, Maria
    CHEMISTRY & INDUSTRY, 2012, 76 (08) : 7 - 7
  • [29] One animal, two protocols - an appropriate application of the 3Rs?
    Silverman, Jerald
    LAB ANIMAL, 2007, 36 (03) : 13 - 13
  • [30] Implementing the 3Rs: improving experimental approaches in animal biology
    Knight, Kathryn
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2016, 219 (16): : 2414 - 2415