Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "How to Do Research Fairly in an Unjust World"

被引:0
|
作者
Ballantyne, Angela J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Donaghue Initiat Biomed & Behav Res Eth, Interdisciplinary Ctr Bioeth, ISPS, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS | 2010年 / 10卷 / 06期
关键词
DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH; BENEFITS; EXPLOITATION; FAIRNESS; MAXIMIN; TRIALS; TAX;
D O I
10.1080/15265161.2010.492747
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
International research, sponsored by for-profit companies, is regularly criticised as unethical on the grounds that it exploits research subjects in developing countries. Many commentators agree that exploitation occurs when the benefits of cooperative activity are unfairly distributed between the parties. To determine whether international research is exploitative we therefore need an account of fair distribution. Procedural accounts of fair bargaining have been popular solutions to this problem, but I argue that they are insufficient to protect against exploitation. I argue instead that a maximin principle of fair distribution provides a more compelling normative account of fairness in relationships characterised by extreme vulnerability and inequality of bargaining potential between the parties. A global tax on international research would provide a mechanism for implementing the maximin account of fair benefits. This model has the capacity to ensure fair benefits and thereby prevent exploitation in international research.
引用
收藏
页码:W4 / W6
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nonmaleficence, Nondisclosure, and Nocebo: Response to Open Peer Commentaries
    Fortunato, John T.
    Wasserman, Jason Adam
    Menkes, Daniel Londyn
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2017, 17 (07): : W4 - W5
  • [22] Deidentification and Its Discontents: Response to the Open Peer Commentaries
    Rothstein, Mark A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2010, 10 (09): : W1 - W2
  • [23] Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "What is The Best Standard for the Standard of Care in Clinical Research?"
    van der Graaf, Rieke
    van Delden, Johannes J. M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2009, 9 (6-7): : W7 - W8
  • [24] Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Do Clinicians Have a Duty to Participate in Pragmatic Clinical Trials?"
    Garland, Andrew
    Morain, Stephanie
    Sugarman, Jeremy
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2023, 23 (10): : W1 - W3
  • [25] Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "An Ethical Analysis of Mandatory Influenza Vaccination of Health Care Personnel: Implementing Fairly and Balancing Benefits and Burdens"
    Antommaria, Armand H. Matheny
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2014, 14 (07): : W1 - W4
  • [26] Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Partnering with Patients to Bridge Gaps in Consent for Acute Care Research"
    Dickert, Neal W.
    Bernard, A. Michelle
    Brabson, JoAnne M.
    Hunter, Rodney J.
    McLemore, Regina
    Mitchell, Andrea R.
    Palmer, Stephen
    Reed, Barbara
    Riedford, Michele
    Simpson, Raymond T.
    Speight, Candace D.
    Steadman, Tracie
    Pentz, Rebecca D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2020, 20 (08): : W12 - W13
  • [27] Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Governance of Transnational Global Health Research Consortia and Health Equity"
    Pratt, Bridget
    Hyder, Adnan A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2017, 17 (01): : W4 - W6
  • [28] Response to Open Peer Commentaries on '"Paid to Endure': Paid Research Participation, Passivity, and the Goods of Work"
    Malmqvist, Erik
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2019, 19 (09): : W3 - W5
  • [29] Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Do Researchers Have an Obligation to Actively Look for Genetic Incidental Findings?"
    Gliwa, Catherine
    Berkman, Benjamin E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2013, 13 (05): : W10 - W11
  • [30] Midadolescents' Language Learning at School: A Response to Open Peer Commentaries
    Uccelli, Paola
    [J]. LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2023, 73 : 252 - 267