Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "How to Do Research Fairly in an Unjust World"

被引:0
|
作者
Ballantyne, Angela J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Donaghue Initiat Biomed & Behav Res Eth, Interdisciplinary Ctr Bioeth, ISPS, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS | 2010年 / 10卷 / 06期
关键词
DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH; BENEFITS; EXPLOITATION; FAIRNESS; MAXIMIN; TRIALS; TAX;
D O I
10.1080/15265161.2010.492747
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
International research, sponsored by for-profit companies, is regularly criticised as unethical on the grounds that it exploits research subjects in developing countries. Many commentators agree that exploitation occurs when the benefits of cooperative activity are unfairly distributed between the parties. To determine whether international research is exploitative we therefore need an account of fair distribution. Procedural accounts of fair bargaining have been popular solutions to this problem, but I argue that they are insufficient to protect against exploitation. I argue instead that a maximin principle of fair distribution provides a more compelling normative account of fairness in relationships characterised by extreme vulnerability and inequality of bargaining potential between the parties. A global tax on international research would provide a mechanism for implementing the maximin account of fair benefits. This model has the capacity to ensure fair benefits and thereby prevent exploitation in international research.
引用
收藏
页码:W4 / W6
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "How Payment for Research Participation Can Be Coercive"
    Millum, Joseph
    Garnett, Michael
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2020, 20 (08): : W8 - W11
  • [2] Community, Equity, and Cultural Change in Open Research: A Response to Open Peer Commentaries
    Marsden, Emma
    Morgan-Short, Kara
    [J]. LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2023, 73 : 430 - 443
  • [3] Response to open peer commentaries on "Strangers at the Beachside: Research Ethics Consultation"
    Cho, Mildred K.
    Tobin, Sara L.
    Greely, Henry T.
    McCormick, Jennifer
    Boyce, Angie
    Magnus, David
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2008, 8 (03): : W4 - W6
  • [4] Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Must Research Participants Understand Randomization?''
    Wendler, David
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2009, 9 (02): : W1 - W2
  • [5] Goldilocks and the Thanatron: A Response to Open Peer Commentaries
    Pullman, Daryl
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2023, 23 (12): : W4 - W6
  • [6] Response to open peer commentaries on "Justifying a Presumption of Restraint in Animal Biotechnology Research"
    Flester, Autumn
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2008, 8 (06): : W1 - W2
  • [7] Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Social Contexts Influence Ethical Considerations of Research"
    Levine, Robert J.
    Gordon, Judith B.
    Mazure, Carolyn M.
    Rubin, Philip E.
    Schaller, Barry R.
    Young, John L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2011, 11 (05): : W1 - W2
  • [8] Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Bioethical Considerations in Translational Research: Primate Stroke"
    Sughrue, Michael E.
    Mocco, J.
    Mack, Willam J.
    Ducruet, Andrew F.
    Komotar, Ricardo J.
    Flschbach, Ruth L.
    Martin, Thomas E.
    Connolly, E. Sander, Jr.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2009, 9 (05): : W1 - W3
  • [9] Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Solidarity and Community Engagement in Global Health Research"
    Pratt, Bridget
    Cheah, Phaik Yeong
    Marsh, Vicki
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2020, 20 (08): : W14 - W16
  • [10] Genetic Enhancement Revisited: Response to Open Peer Commentaries
    Fan, Ruiping
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2010, 10 (04): : W6 - W8