Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial (vol 273, pg 105, 2016)

被引:3
|
作者
Nelissen, Rik C. [1 ]
den Besten, Christine A. [1 ]
Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M. [1 ]
Hol, Myrthe K. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, POB 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Baha; Bone conduction; Bone-anchored hearing aid; Bone-anchored hearing system; Early loading; Implant stability quotient (ISQ); Implant survival; Ponto; Quality of life; Resonance frequency analysis (RFA);
D O I
10.1007/s00405-015-3798-z
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to compare the stability, survival, and tolerability of 2 percutaneous osseointegrated titanium implants for bone conduction hearing: a 4.5-mm diameter implant (test) and a 3.75-mm diameter implant (control). Fifty-seven adult patients were included in this randomized controlled clinical trial. Sixty implants were allocated in a 2: 1 (test-control) ratio. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days; 6 and 12 weeks; and 6 months. At every visit, implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were recorded by means of resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and skin reactions were evaluated according to the Holgers classification. Implants were loaded with the bone conduction device at 3 weeks. Hearing-related quality of life was evaluated using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI), and the Glasgow Health Status Inventory (GHSI). ISQ values were statistically significantly higher for the test implant compared to the control implant. No implants were lost and soft tissue reactions were comparable for both implants. Positive results were reported in the hearing-related quality of life questionnaires. These 6-month results indicate that both implants and their corresponding hearing devices are safe options for hearing rehabilitation in patients with the appropriate indications. Loading at 3 weeks did not affect the stability of either implant.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 114
页数:2
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Rik C. Nelissen
    Christine A. den Besten
    Emmanuel A. M. Mylanus
    Myrthe K. S. Hol
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2016, 273 : 105 - 111
  • [2] Three-year Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a 4.5-mm-Wide to a 3.75-mm-Wide Titanium Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing
    Kruyt, Ivo J.
    Nelissen, Rik C.
    Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
    Hol, Myrthe K. S.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2018, 39 (05) : 609 - 615
  • [3] Long-Term Stability, Survival, and Tolerability of a Novel Osseointegrated Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing: 3-Year Data From a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Investigation
    Nelissen, Rik C.
    Stalfors, Joacim
    de Wolf, Maarten J. F.
    Flynn, Mark C.
    Wigren, Stina
    Eeg-Olofsson, Mans
    Green, Kevin
    Rothera, Kmichael P.
    Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
    Hol, Myrthe K. S.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2014, 35 (08) : 1486 - 1491