Accuracy of manual entry of drug administration data into an anesthesia information management system

被引:2
|
作者
Avidan, Alexander [1 ]
Dotan, Koren [1 ]
Weissman, Charles [1 ]
Cohen, Matan J. [2 ,3 ]
Levin, Phillip D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hadassah Hebrew Univ Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, IL-91120 Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Hadassah Hebrew Univ Med Ctr, Ctr Qual & Clin Safety, IL-91120 Jerusalem, Israel
[3] Hadassah Hebrew Univ Med Ctr, Dept Clin Microbiol & Infect Dis, IL-91120 Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
COMPLETENESS; FUTURE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Data on drug administration are entered manually into anesthesia information management systems (AIMS). This study examined whether these data are accurate regarding drug name, dose administered, and time of administration, and whether the stage of anesthesia influences data accuracy. Real-time observational data on drug administration during elective operations were compared with computerized information on drug administration entered by anesthesiologists. A trained observer (K.D.) performed the observations. Data were collected during 57 operations which included 596 separate occasions of drug administration by 22 anesthesiologists. No AIMS records were found for 90 (15.1%) occasions of drug administration (omissions), while there were 11 (1.8%) AIMS records where drug administration was not observed. The AIMS and observer data matched for drug name on 495 of 596 (83.1%) occasions, for dose on 439 of 495 (92.5%) occasions, and for time on 476 of 495 (96.2%) occasions. Amongst the 90 omitted records, 34 (37.8%) were for vasoactive drugs with 24 (27.7%) for small doses of hypnotics. Omissions occurred mostly during maintenance: 50 of 153 (24.6%), followed by induction: 30 of 325 (9.2%) and emergence: 10 of 57 (17.5%) (P < 0.001). Time and dose inaccuracies occurred mainly during induction, followed by maintenance and emergence; time inaccuracies were 7/325 (8.3%), 10/203 (4.9%), and 0/57 (0%), respectively (P = 0.07), and dose inaccuracies were 15/325 (4.6%), 3/203 (1.5%), and 1/57 (1.7%), respectively (P = 0.11). The range of accuracy varies when anesthesiologists manually enter drug administration data into an AIMS. Charting omissions represent the largest cause of inaccuracy, principally by omissions of records for vasopressors and small doses of hypnotic drugs. Manually entered drug administration data are not without errors. Accuracy of entering drug administration data remains the responsibility of the anesthesiologist.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 985
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Manual Editing of Automatically Recorded Data in an Anesthesia Information Management System
    Wax, David B.
    Beilin, Yaakov
    Hossain, Sabera
    Lin, Hung-Mo
    Reich, David L.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2008, 109 (05) : 811 - 815
  • [2] Context-sensitive mandatory data-entry fields for data completeness and accuracy in anesthesia information management systems
    Avidan, Alexander
    Weissman, Charles
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2013, 60 (03): : 325 - 325
  • [3] Context-sensitive mandatory data-entry fields for data completeness and accuracy in anesthesia information management systems
    Alexander Avidan
    Charles Weissman
    Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2013, 60 : 325 - 326
  • [4] Accuracy of manual entry of drug administration data into an anesthesia information management systemPrécision de la saisie manuelle de l’administration d’un médicament dans un système de gestion de l’information pour l’anesthésie
    Alexander Avidan
    Koren Dotan
    Charles Weissman
    Matan J. Cohen
    Phillip D. Levin
    Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2014, 61 (11): : 979 - 985
  • [5] Anesthesia recordkeeping: accuracy of recall with computerized and manual entry recordkeeping
    Davis, Thomas Corey
    Green, Jeffrey A.
    Colquhoun, Alexander
    Hage, Brenda L.
    Biddle, Chuck
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2012, 26 (03) : 163 - 169
  • [6] Anesthesia recordkeeping: accuracy of recall with computerized and manual entry recordkeeping
    Thomas Corey Davis
    Jeffrey A. Green
    Alexander Colquhoun
    Brenda L. Hage
    Chuck Biddle
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2012, 26 : 163 - 169
  • [7] High precision of data in an anesthesia information management system does not imply high accuracy
    Walsh, John L.
    Meyer, Mark A.
    Bittner, Edward A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 108 : 142 - 143
  • [8] Using an Anesthesia Information Management System to Improve Case Log Data Entry and Resident Workflow
    Brown, David L.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 112 (02): : 260 - 261
  • [9] Context-sensitive mandatory data-entry fields for data completeness and accuracy in anesthesia information management systems Reply
    Wanderer, Jonathan P.
    Ehrenfeld, Jesse M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2013, 60 (03): : 326 - 326
  • [10] The reliability of manual reporting of clinical events in an anesthesia information management system (AIMS)
    Simpao, Allan F.
    Pruitt, Eric Y.
    Cook-Sather, Scott D.
    Gurnaney, Harshad G.
    Rehman, Mohamed A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2012, 26 (06) : 437 - 439