共 50 条
Prioritizing climate-smart agriculture: An organizational and temporal review
被引:19
|作者:
Gardezi, Maaz
[1
]
Michael, Semhar
[2
]
Stock, Ryan
[3
]
Vij, Sumit
[4
,5
]
Ogunyiola, Ayorinde
[6
]
Ishtiaque, Asif
[7
]
机构:
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Sociol, Blacksburg, VA USA
[2] South Dakota State Univ, Math & Stat, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
[3] Northern Michigan Univ, Dept Earth Environm & Geog Sci, Marquette, MI USA
[4] Wageningen Univ & Res, Publ Adm & Policy Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ, Earth & Climate Cluster, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Purdue Univ, Dept Forestry & Nat Resources, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[7] Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金:
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词:
climate-smart agriculture;
Global South;
international organizations;
topic modeling;
triple-wins;
SMALLHOLDER FARMERS;
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY;
TRIPLE-WINS;
ADAPTATION;
KNOWLEDGE;
DISTRICT;
POLICY;
FOOD;
VULNERABILITY;
DETERMINANTS;
D O I:
10.1002/wcc.755
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
Extant systematic literature reviews on the topic of climate smart agriculture (CSA) have mainly focused on two issues: reviewing framing of the CSA discourse in the academic and policy literature; and policy initiatives in the Global South that enhance the adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices. Yet, there is little systematic investigation into how international organizations can help smallholder farmers manage agricultural systems to respond to climate change. Analyzing these organization's priorities and highlighting their knowledge gaps are crucial for designing future pathways of CSA. We intend to use this article to identify overarching CSA themes that can guide large international organizations to focus their CSA agenda in the hope of achieving goals associated with food security and sustainable intensification. We specifically ask the following question: How have the key CSA topics and themes emerged in the gray literature of international organizations between 2010 and 2020? We adopted a topic modeling approach to identify how six international organizations engaged with several topics related to CSA. Following the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) approach, we identified eight topics in the documents, representing four overarching themes: gender research, weather and climate, CSA management and food security. We found that there is insufficient discussion on the issues relating to governance measures and gender mainstreaming, with a larger focus on techno-managerial measures of CSA. We conclude that research and training related to CSA must offer opportunities for marginalized and disproportionately vulnerable populations to participate and raise their voices and share innovative ideas at different levels of governance. This article is categorized under: Climate and Development > Social Justice and the Politics of Development Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Institutions for Adaptation
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文